Greetings!
This is my first post to this developer list. I have been following this
list for quite some time already.
I have been active on JT modes for nearly 3 years now (HF exclusively)
2500+ JT mode QSOs in the log.
Regarding this discussion on RRR & RR73 and speeding up the report exchange
h
I have been playing with it on 20 mtrs and 40 mtrs.
I noticed with tx pct 20% it appeared to tx every other minute but at 10% it
appears to be random.
I have not tried 20% in recent versions so it may be more random now.
A nice mode with just 0.5 watts I was seen in vk/zl/vp8 on 40mtrs 2 nights
On Wed,5/6/2015 11:55 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> One possible source of audio latency is any re-sampling done by the
> operating system, this can be eliminated by ensuring that the default
> sample for the sound card is 48 kHz. Older versions of MS Windows like
> XP and Vista are particularly
On Mon,5/11/2015 1:34 PM, Eric NO3M wrote:
> I did capture WH2XGP (W7IUV) in WA last night.
To put this in context, Eric has a spectacular farm of RX antennas. I'm
70 miles S of San Francisco; he consistently hears me when I'm QRP CW on
160M, and often on the first call.
73, Jim K9YC
---
Joe
I have been running WSJT-X 1.6.x in WSPR mode on 630M (WG2XJM) for the
past couple of nights, and seems to work fine, nothing particularly
unexpected, just not many guys to decode as most are off the air due to
storms in the mid-west, etc. I did capture WH2XGP (W7IUV) in WA last night.
I
I also did a patch for RR73 as a standard message but it was pretty much
disapproved for technical reasons and apparently has been discussed before.
RRR is one of the special short code single tones so changing that is not
good for weak/QSB situations.
'tis true if you read the help it shows you
Hi all,
Just a brief note to let you know that WSPR mode is now alive and well
in WSJT-X v1.6.1.
If you have been building recent experimental versions of WSJT-X for
yourself, please give WSPR mode a try. It does not (yet) support "band
hopping" or a few other advanced features of standard WS
Michael Black writes:
>
>
> Since RRR is the 73 for the CQ side this is a simple patch that allows RRR
to act the same as 73 for getting the log pop up window and advancing the
Next button.
> Does this sound OK or are there other side effects?
If RRR is the 73 for the CQ side, changing it to R
Since RRR is the 73 for the CQ side this is a simple patch that allows RRR
to act the same as 73 for getting the log pop up window and advancing the
Next button.
Does this sound OK or are there other side effects?
73
Mike W9MDB
Index: mainwindow.cpp
=
