Um ... not specifically a user guide issue, but if you could change the
website page for 'program development' to point to the JTSDK for the
various OSs, it would eliminate some confusion for a few users who want
to build their own?
Neil
KN3ILZ
On 10/30/15 02:43 pm, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
A few weeks ago I mentioned a Fortran error box that popped up when
running v.1.6.1.
The error's still occurring on the last build I did on Wednesday. I
haven't tried building anything new, as I had a death in the family, and
had to head to New Jersey. I'll try again tomorrow and build a dbug
Joe,
I just noticed that the snr that the modified jt65 reports for the -24db files
is now about -21 db. I think that it's because the program derives its snr
estimate from the pilot-tone and not from the symbols. We expect a 3db
improvement in going from half-symbol to full-symbol coherent int
Joe -
I should add that I manually change the configuration of the jt65 program
between the -24db test and the hf test as follows:
for -24dB data (eme-like) conditions:
in jt65a_exp.f90:
I used only one decoding pass and nsubtract=0
in jt65.f90:
ntrials=1
nfa=1250
These developments are really due to the talent of Steve, K9AN, and not
Joe- don't lose sight of that. Steve has made incredible progress- let's
hope he finds some more tricks up his sleeve!
-Chase
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Michael Black wrote:
> Color me impressed and shiver-me-timbers.
Color me impressed and shiver-me-timbers.
Only been running this a short while but it's decoding stuff I can't even
see now buried in QRM!
Great job guys!!
73
Mike W9MDB.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Steven Franke
wrote:
> Hi Joe and all,
>
> I’ve just committed a batch of modified routin
Joe -
For reference, here is the bash script that I used to convert my JTSim files to
16-bits at 12kS/s. You’d have to change the directory name, of course.
Steve
#!/bin/bash
for i in $( cd ../JT65-24db; ls A*.WAV); do
echo $i;
sox --ignore-length ../JT65-24db/$i -r 12000 -b 16 ./$i;
done
-
Hi Joe and all,
I’ve just committed a batch of modified routines associated with my attempts to
improve the low-SNR performance of wsjt-x.
I did a number of experiments aimed at identifying why wsjt-x was not
performing as well as wsjt on our low-snr test files. I used the jt65 test
program a
On 31/10/2015 17:30, John Nelson wrote:
> The "name" field is not added to wsjtx.log because of an error in
> logqso.cpp. Misplaced ";" after "comments".
Thanks John,
that appears to be my fault:(
Fixed in develop and the 1.5 branch. It will flow into the wsjtx_exp
branch after Joe does the
Hello,
Please ignore my previous message, I have already found in the JTSDK-QT help
right commands to compile v1.6.1 r602*:
checkout-wsjtxexp
build-wsjtxexp package
73,
Igor UA3DJY
>Пятница, 30 октября 2015, 12:21 +03:00 от Игорь Ч :
>
>Hello,
>
>I am trying to compile WSJT-X 1.6.1 using
The "name" field is not added to wsjtx.log because of an error in logqso.cpp.
Misplaced ";" after "comments".
--- G4KLA/RevX6028/wsjtx/logqso.cpp (revision 6028)
+++ G4KLA/RevX6028/wsjtx/logqso.cpp (working copy)
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
m_dateTime.time().toString("hh:mm,") + hisCal
Will meteorscatter modes be included ?
On 30. okt. 2015 20:19, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 30/10/2015 18:43, Joe Taylor wrote:
>> I would appreciate your giving some thought to what may be missing from
>> this short list. In what other ways is the present WSJT-X v1.6.0 user
>> guide incomplet
Hi Joe
You welcome to use any of the material in this:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B116IwQIUFNTR3A3SWtIWTVsX2s/view?usp=sharin
g
Its fairly up to date but doesn't include (yet) anything about Echo Graph
options and use of the new checkbox.
73
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Jo
13 matches
Mail list logo
