Re: [wsjt-devel] Field day mods?

Neil, That’s all true. But, FD is the best exposure to ham radio community for one day for all year long - all over the world. FD makes more contacts in one day than any contest or DXExpedition. My ‘suggestions’ is only that. Something to cogitate. 73 de W8NET Gene 3905 Century Club Mast

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field day mods?

On 5/11/2018 12:06 PM, Gene Marsh wrote: Neil (and all), Below 73 de W8NET Gene 3905 Century Club Master #47 Member - Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) ARRL A-1 Op On May 10, 2018, at 6:54 PM, Neil Zampella > wrote: A number of things: 1.  you can

[wsjt-devel] Enable Easy Re-Read of ADI Log File

I use an array of  wsjtx_log.adi files to manage my QSOs by band and mode. Each has a descriptive name appended to the front of "wsjtx_log.adi". This keeps the wsjtx_log.adi file much smaller than a monolithic file while preserving all of the past contact information. When I operate using a particu

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Subprocess Error

On 12/05/2018 00:04, Steve Sacco NN4X wrote: Yes, that's where the "Here are the 'Details' from the message box:" part of my e-mail originated; I clicked on the "Show details button, exactly as you said." Hi Steve, I would expect text like that below if you had hit CTRL+C to copy the message

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Subprocess Error

Hi Bill - Yes, that's where the "Here are the 'Details' from the message box:" part of my e-mail originated; I clicked on the "Show details button, exactly as you said." On 5/11/2018 6:16 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Expeditionj & Standard Mode Enhancement Requests - from an expeditioner's perspective

On 5/11/2018 3:41 PM, Grant Willis wrote: Standard Mode Useability Feedback In standard mode when faced with a major pileup, the following ideas would be very helpful. These are mostly GUI changes. These suggestions make a lot of sense to me. I worked you from YJ0AG, and quickly observed fr

[wsjt-devel] Expeditionj & Standard Mode Enhancement Requests - from an expeditioner's perspective

Hello, I recently returned home having run a mini DXPedition from Vanuatu for 2 weeks in the South Pacific as YJ0AG. While there I ran a lot of FT8 operations among other modes. At Joe's request I deliberately did not run expedition mode, and can see that real problems are going to arise if a w

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Subprocess Error

On 11/05/2018 23:10, Steve Sacco NN4X wrote: This is the 2nd time I've received this message.  Both times were after long periods of WSJT-X running.  In this case, I hadn't even had the radio on for the last 6 hours or so. Here are the "Details" from the message box: Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Subprocess Error

This is the 2nd time I've received this message.  Both times were after long periods of WSJT-X running.  In this case, I hadn't even had the radio on for the last 6 hours or so. Here are the "Details" from the message box: Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X

Re: [wsjt-devel] Another Test of DXpedition Mode

Joe, I will not be home until tomorrow morning. I will have no chance to build. The Hound has to be the r8658 build for the test? 73 de W8NET Gene 3905 Century Club Master #47 Member - Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) ARRL A-1 Op > On May 11, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Joe Taylor wrote: >

[wsjt-devel] Another Test of DXpedition Mode

Hi all, We are are planning another test of FT8 DXpedition Mode tomorrow, May 12, at 1400 UTC. The purpose is to do on-the-air tests of fixes for minor bugs found in WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc4 during last Saturday's test run. Program corrections in WSJT-X v1.9.0 r8658 (relative to v1.9.0-rc4 r8642)

Re: [wsjt-devel] fyi ubuntu 18.04LTS

Hello All, In isolation, this approach may produce the desired results. However, it violates concern separation and could break other applications that have specific library dependencies. This is especially true at the system level. User-Space library linking would be another topic entirely. For

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 auto seq suspected bug with audio split

N times could be 0 or 1 after called person responds to someone else. If it is more, it is useless as if called is using  RR73 qso lasts just 2 periods (getting R-report and 73 of opponent station) This is, in a way, against the golden idea of wsjt-x program that operator should be present all

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field day mods?

Neil (and all), Below 73 de W8NET Gene 3905 Century Club Master #47 Member - Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) ARRL A-1 Op > On May 10, 2018, at 6:54 PM, Neil Zampella wrote: > > A number of things: > > 1. you can use the CQ FD XXX Grid as the call, Doesn’t have to be the ‘CQ

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field day mods?

Same here, Al. I think it is a good idea. 73 de W8NET Gene 3905 Century Club Master #47 Member - Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS) ARRL A-1 Op > On May 10, 2018, at 3:24 PM, Al Pawlowski wrote: > > I like it. I see Field day as not only training, but PR and get together. All > thr

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 auto seq suspected bug with audio split

An option setting, to call/send “n” (maybe 1 - 3) times after called person responds to someone else and you are not on their frequency, seems like a worthwhile idea to me. Al Pawlowski, K6AVP Los Osos, CA USA > Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 14:29:46 + > From: Tom M0LTE mailto:t...@m0lte.uk>> > T

Re: [wsjt-devel] Communication Error

The K3 can apparently be quite slow when switching bands and such. I recently saw a 3.5 second timeout was not long enough. So bump up your timeout value to 5000 and see if the problems disappear. de Mike W9MDB On Friday, May 11, 2018, 9:26:12 AM CDT, Claude Frantz wrote: On 05/10/20

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 auto seq suspected bug with audio split

Hi Ed Thanks for the insight. Clearly I'm with you, since I've reported it as a suspected bug :-) It seems crazy to transmit a ton of overs that will never get replies just to "hold your place" in an imaginary queue, doesn't it. If there are people in both camps surely this should be an opt

Re: [wsjt-devel] Communication Error

On 05/10/2018 10:21 PM, Sherman Banks wrote: Hi Sherman & All, > Trying to control a K3. The most common error is > Hamlib error: Protocol error while opening connection to rig > But I have seen one related to the VFO but that doesn’t happen as often. > I have the Timeout at 3000 and polling at

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 auto seq suspected bug with audio split

Hi ! On October 10, 2017 I have suggested to disable TX also when split answering and answer goes to someone else to avoid unnecessary qrm. But we are the minority and we have to live with it. -- Saku OH1KH Ed Wilson via wsjt-devel kirjoitti 11.05.2018 klo 14:19: Tom, My understanding is t

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 auto seq suspected bug with audio split

Tom, My understanding is that this is not a bug, but is by design. I would prefer that Tx would be disabled in this situation, but others think just the opposite. I believe that the reasoning is that if you continue to call a station (off frequency), then you might be next in his queue when he w

[wsjt-devel] FT8 auto seq suspected bug with audio split

Good morning A quick search of the archive didn't turn up anything, so reporting just in case it isn't known. (I'm fairly sure it must be.) Software version: WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc4 Mode: FT8 Auto seq enabled Hold Tx Freq ticked When responding to a CQ by double clicking the left pane, when I have