Re: [wsjt-devel] Icom and Yaesu CAT USB Interface

On 04/07/2018 01:18, John Zantek wrote: Sorry if it sounds like I’m demanding, Bill.  Please substitute ‘disappointed’ that I’ve not stumbled into the solution, or found anyone who’s worked on ic7700.c _and_ has a IC-7700 to explain the architecture they used when they coded it.  It’s copyright

[wsjt-devel] Fox answer when multicarrier is in use

Hi! Today was the first day I ever heard KH1 @ FT8. CW has been received every day, even up to s7/QSB, but with 100W and dipole it is impossible to fight with others. So, as decoded now I started also TX and even got so far as R+rpt. Missed RR73. I think more trying today is useless as they d

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

Hi Steve, I am glad I have received a memo from Urbana-Champaign. I am sorry I confused you by the misuse of the terminology about FTXX and QRAXX. I meant QRAXX as “Q-ary Repeat-Accumulate Codes for Weak Signal Communications” in Nico’s literature but I do not have any intent to modify wsjt-

Re: [wsjt-devel] Icom IC-700/RS-BA1/WSJT-X

Hi! You just need cheap usb-rs232 dongle (ebay $2-$3), one TTL chip 74LS05, 10k and 4k7 resistors. All together well under $10, should say under $5. I just blow my Ci-V level converter that was made with MAX232 chip and made new one with those. Usb-rs232 dongles do not have rs232 specification

Re: [wsjt-devel] Tx/Rx

With people that are used to operate with GUIs, as it is today, looking what happens on waterfall buttons are reversed. Those ones that still think things like what they used to see on rig display and buttons (on 1900 century) those buttons work as expected. Fortunately they are easy to reverse

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

Hi Take-san, > I meant QRAXX as “Q-ary Repeat-Accumulate Codes for Weak Signal > Communications” in Nico’s literature but I do not have any intent to modify > wsjt-X “QRA64” mode to this discussion. Understood. But why not scale the well-known results from Nico’s excellent QRA64 mode to see w

Re: [wsjt-devel] Help WSJT-X FT857D NAVIGATOR Modem

Bill First, let me thank you for the reply to help with my quest. I need to know what menu items to change to allow for WSJT-X FT8 operation. Several others use the Signal link modem with success, but when questioned, do not share/ answer my questions. The Navigator works fine with an IC-7600 (pl

Re: [wsjt-devel] Help WSJT-X FT857D NAVIGATOR Modem

You don't need a SIgnaLink with the IC-7600. All you need is one standard USB cable from the rig to your PC and you'll get both a COM port for CAT control and a USB audio device for the audio. Do you have such a cable? de Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, July 4, 2018, 5:16:24 AM CDT, Charles Otno

Re: [wsjt-devel] Icom and Yaesu CAT USB Interface

Tnx Bill! John From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 12:58 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Icom and Yaesu CAT USB Interface On 04/07/2018 01:18, John Zantek wrote: Sorry if it sounds like I’m demanding, Bill.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

Steve, Thank you for your comments. Ok, I understand what is the disagreement between us. First, I do not fully understand the point why you object my +4dB gain but I need to find modulation theory book in my book sheves (never opened for more than 20 years) and check about “ *bit* SNR, Eb/N0”

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

Hi Take, On 7/4/2018 9:20 AM, Tsutsumi Takehiko JA5AEA wrote: Concerning the “second +4dB term”, I remember Bill’s suggestion included hashing of callsign (I used the number of (28-15) x 5 = 65 bit reduction). I also reduced five 7x7 synch to one 7x7 synch, which I am not sure whether Bill in

[wsjt-devel] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Managing Frequencies in WSTJ-X for FT8.

--- Begin Message --- Claude, I received a notice stating my email to the wsjt-devel list was not deliverable.  Would you forward my suggestion to the list? TU, Bill N6WS Forwarded Message Subject:Re: [wsjt-devel] Managing Frequencies in WSTJ-X for FT8. Date: Wed,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

I’ll throw my experience in for what it’s worth: I worked KH1/KH7Z on 20 and 30 within a few minutes a few nights ago. I had Hound mode set, antennas ready, etc. No problems making the two contacts. But I got it started by double clicking one of his reply messages. There were no CQs, a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

On 7/4/2018 4:40 PM, David Fisher wrote: Later when I uploaded to ClugLog, I was reminded that I logged the wrong callsign.  Easily fixed in ClubLog, but for LOTW, all I could do was log the contacts again as KH1/KH7X. I also simply click on their call when they're sending to someone else. I'

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

Hello Jim- I worked them several times and uploaded the contacts Club Log and LOTW but. On Club Log I see "W" not green "C". No QSL in LOTW. Just getting started with C.L. am I doing something wrong? Thanks; 73; Bill W2PKY On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:56 PM Jim Brown wrote: > On 7/4/2018 4:40 PM,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

On 7/4/2018 6:53 PM, Bill Barrett wrote: Hello Jim- I worked them several times and uploaded the contacts Club Log and LOTW but. On Club Log I see "W" not green "C". No QSL in LOTW. Just getting started with C.L. am I doing something wrong? Go to ClubLog, but before you even sign in, click on

Re: [wsjt-devel] Observation on Expedition Mode

Joe, It is good to hear from you to increase your calculation about my additional gain proposal from +(1~8) dB to +(1.5~8) dB. If you look into synch words, you may be able to get another additional gain. Regards, take de JA5AEA Sent from Mail