That sounds a lot like RFI. Usually happens on specific bands and certain
power levels.
Check your audio devices in the sound control panel when it happens to see if
audio is going to a different device.
de Mike W9MDB
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019, 10:00:21 PM CST, bergeracb--- via wsjt-de
While operating FT8 I get an occasional Problem with wsjt-x quitting
transmitting. It is still receiving and decoding OK, but will not turn the
6700 on and no audio drive is being sent to wsjt-x over the DAX link. When I
shut wsjt-x down using the red "X" the wsjt-x program is moved from the ta
Yup - deleted it INSTANTLY...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 2, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Gary McDuffie wrote:
>
> If you want someone to click that link, you should put some explanation for
> what it is to convince people that it is legit. I know very few people who
> would click such a link without
I see it as a good test of the FT8 decoder's ability to pull out the
data from all the dross.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 1/2/2019 9:50 PM, Jeff Stai wk6i.j...@gmail.com [wsjtgroup] wrote:
Here:
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ContestResults/2019/January%202019%20QST%20-%20Taylor%20-%20FT8.pdf
I'm curious
That’s BRILLIANT!
73 de W8NET Miles / “Gene”
Secretary, Portage County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS)
> On Jan 2, 2019, at 9:22 PM, Gary Hinson wrote:
>
> Hi George,
>
> Another approach is to use AUDIO instead of RF for your demo. No radios
> needed, just laptops. Deliberately route the FT
Here:
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ContestResults/2019/January%202019%20QST%20-%20Taylor%20-%20FT8.pdf
I'm curious where these ranges came from. The 10/15/20 meter ranges look
like a good idea, but it seems like 3.590-3.600MHz and 7.080-7.100MHz are
recipes for a lot of FT8 frustration.
Both of
Hi George,
Another approach is to use AUDIO instead of RF for your demo. No radios
needed, just laptops. Deliberately route the FT8 audio output to the
loudspeaker and use the microphone for audio input. In a typical meeting room,
there is generally enough audio level for decoding, above
If you want someone to click that link, you should put some explanation for
what it is to convince people that it is legit. I know very few people who
would click such a link without knowing what to expect to see there. Wouldn’t
touch it with YOUR ten foot pole, much less mine.
Gary - AG0N
>
Couple of ideas
#1 You can actually use speaker/mic to do it so no RF is involved at all.
#2 You can run one computer with two big monitors and run 4 or 5 copies of
WSJT-X all on virtual audio cables.
You can do your own test that way to learn the Fox side a bit better.
de Mike W9MDB
O
I have been asked to set up a F/H demo for our hamfest in March. I'm
thinking run the power all the way down on some rigs set up around the room
and transmitting into dummy loads on a very discrete frequency so as to not
get people too excited elsewhere. This way the local hams could actually
see
FT8 in State QSO Parties?
This year there will be QSO parties for all States except Alaska. Most are
run by individual States, but there are two regional ones (New England QSO
Party and the 7th Call Area QSO Party). At present in WSJT-X V2.0.0 there
isn’t a FT8 ‘Special Operating Activity’ modu
Unfortunately, that had no effect. I would have been surprised if it had,
since there is no USB connection between my computer and the radio.
Everything goes over Ethernet. I experienced the same thing with my old rig
(FTdx5000) when I was connected via USB.
So I'll keep looking for a solution. I
https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/science-environment-46742298?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Fscience-environment-46742298
Sent from Xfinity Connect Application
-Original Message-
From: n...@comcast.net
To
https://youtu.be/yN4nF02cCbo
Sent from Xfinity Connect Application
-Original Message-
From: n...@comcast.net
To: j...@princeton.edu, on4...@voo.be, wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 2019-01-01 4:35:54 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] fyi
https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 15:06, Chris Getman wrote:
>
> And why would I want stations to queue up on his frequency?
Actually, no one should be transmitting on his frequency, but some insist on it
anyway.
Lock the TX, find a clear frequency, and call him there.
Gary - AG0N
___
> See info
>
> The official 2018 FT8 Roundup Results are now available online:
>
> https://www.rttycontesting.com/ft8-roundup/2018-results/
>
> Thanks to all who participated to make this inaugural event a success.
>
> Online certificates will be available before the end of January 2019.
>
> 7
See info
The official 2018 FT8 Roundup Results are now available online:
https://www.rttycontesting.com/ft8-roundup/2018-results/
Thanks to all who participated to make this inaugural event a success.
Online certificates will be available before the end of January 2019.
73, Don AA5AU & Ed W0YK
It will befor end of januari 2019
Op wo 2 jan. 2019 13:24 schreef Marco Calistri Happy new year everybody!
>
> Sorry for a not tech request, I'd like to know about any forecast for
> this point below published on the FT8 RU page:
>
> 8. Awards: Certificates will be awarded to all participants an
On 02/01/2019 07:18, Michael Tope wrote:
I am a new FT8 user running WSJT-X 2.0. So far I have just been
monitoring the FT8 sub-band on 160 meters (I have not tried
transmitting yet). When I leave WSJT-X 2.0 running for an extended
period, I keep getting the following Subprocess error (Subproce
Happy new year everybody!
Sorry for a not tech request, I'd like to know about any forecast for
this point below published on the FT8 RU page:
8. Awards: Certificates will be awarded to all participants and can be
downloaded online when available.
When certificates will be available?
--
73 d
20 matches
Mail list logo
