Re: [wsjt-devel] VFO-B behavior

2019-03-03 Thread Gary McDuffie
> On Mar 3, 2019, at 13:52, Black Michael via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > On ICOM rigs hamlib assumes split is always on VFOB to cover rigs without > status commands...as does FLRig (and perhaps others). Kenwood is the same way, and I’m not sure I would want to alter that. Gary - AG0N

Re: [wsjt-devel] VFO-B behavior

2019-03-03 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Both conditions need to fixed.  VFO-A needs to be set as selected VFO and VFO-B set to the split freq at all times.  Otherwise a tune instigated from an external source will be on the wrong frequency.And yes...I know you can click Tune in WSJT-X and then VFO-B gets set...but that leaves the

Re: [wsjt-devel] VFO-B behavior

2019-03-03 Thread Paul Kube
If VFO-B is the active VFO and you switch bands on WSJT-X only VFOB gets set...VFOA does not change.. The same is true if VFO-A is the active VFO; VFO-B does not get set with a band change until you transmit. I just hit WSJT-X's "Tune" button for a second when switching bands. Works fine on the

Re: [wsjt-devel] VFO-B behavior

2019-03-03 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Also when switching bands should set VFO-B too for split operation if appropriate. Mike On Sunday, March 3, 2019, 2:56:29 PM CST, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Found an undesirable behavior that I think can be easily fixed. On ICOM rigs hamlib assumes split is always on VFOB

[wsjt-devel] VFO-B behavior

2019-03-03 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Found an undesirable behavior that I think can be easily fixed. On ICOM rigs hamlib assumes split is always on VFOB to cover rigs without status commands...as does FLRig (and perhaps others). If VFO-B is the active VFO and you switch bands on WSJT-X only VFOB gets set...VFOA does not change...so

Re: [wsjt-devel] Unexpected Behavior

2019-03-03 Thread Claude Frantz
On 3/2/19 7:35 PM, Tag Loomis (Tag) wrote: Hi Tag, I wouldn't consider it a bug, more of a known action, but I could be wrong of course. It's probably a feature. It would be interesting to see if our expected behaviour can be performed with Ctrl and double click, if I understand well point