You're still wrong.
It isn't at all a lack of ethics to use the software ... only to use the
software for full automatic AND UNATTENDED operation. It isn't
unethical (or illegal) to use the software in full automatic mode if a
licensed operator is in attendance ... it's only unethical to use
If that was the case, why is there a 'Auto QSO' box on the main screen,
and on the Sourceforge site it still says:
"Tool was previously known as WSJT-X xxx Full-Auto Mod" (xx
removes the callsign)
On 8/18/2019 9:26 PM, Ryan Tourge wrote:
Well you are wrong. As it is released it doesn’t
I was planning to, considering that no one can see the lack of ethics in
adding code to make an automatic QSO machine. Using the fact that I
called the software 'illegal' instead of looking at the fact that it can
enable an illegal 'full auto' machine points that out.
On 8/18/2019 10:03 PM,
You're changing your story now. Your previous messages simply said the
software itself was illegal, and when I challenged that your argued the
point and said I was rationalizing.
Just give it up, OK?
Dave AB7E
On 8/18/2019 6:12 PM, Neil Zampella wrote:
By the software being 'illegal'
Well you are wrong. As it is released it doesn’t have that ability. If
someone byte bangs some hack to make it so then your skewed theory would
make just about any ham radio software “illegal.”
Ryan, N2YQT
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:19 PM Neil Zampella wrote:
> By the software being 'illegal' I
By the software being 'illegal' I mean that it has the capability to
allow an illegal act to be performed. I agree, the use of such software
is illegal, having the software is not, however, the mere fact that it
does have the capability to be used as a bot for automatic, non-attended
QSOs should
I have been accepted to the list, but my posts keep getting rejected
because I am a non-member. Am I doing something wrong?
73de K1LDOChris Diederich
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:19 AM -0400
Subjec
"What values are you using for Poll and Timeout in OmniRig?"
The values were declared in my post. Here they are again - poll 250, timeout
1000, Baud 38,400.
I used my station controller to generate a 'scope trigger when TS-590 data was
not refreshed within 500 (later changed to 600 ms). I n
"May I suggest that WSJT-X should be desensitized from these transient OmniRig
fault reports by only responding if they persist for x seconds. "
I made a temporary change to my controller code to flag TS-590 data fail if
either IF, or FA, or FB is not received for 500 ms. This configuration
de
Andy,
What values are you using for Poll and Timeout in OmniRig?
I'm using 100 ms polling and 200 ms timeout.
I ask because I have been having a problem with transmitting (with an
external radio in FM mode when using SDRC's External Radio capability)
I have played with the Polling and Timeout va
I have attempted to use WSJT-X ver 2.1.0 a few more times but continue to be
plagued by rig control failure messages. I have found that WSJT-X rig control
failures are associated with OmniRig Client declarations "Status: Rig not
responding. However, OmniRig seems to issue these messages w
Hi Jari,
That’s useful information. Especially if it can be reproduced.
It says that the DLL named Qt5Core caused an EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION.
(Exception Code: c005) Simply put, it tried to access a memory address it
did not have permission to read or write. But that’s not helpful. Th
Well, yeah, that would be why I also referenced the definition of "Automatic
Operation".
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:03:16 -0700
Jim Preston wrote:
> Under FCC rules, automatic control means not having a control operator
> present at a control point.
_
No, the software by itself is not illegal. The software is capable of
unattended operation, but it isn't illegal unless it is used in that way.
I can let someone who isn't licensed use my station while I am not even
in the U.S., but neither I nor my station is performing an illegal act
unle
The software in question is not the software we're referring to.
I'm amazed at the reaction to what is an obvious circumvention of the
original developers wishes, so much for ethics.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 8/17/2019 5:21 PM, Andras Bato wrote:
Hi Andy,
Plese try to make QSOs using MSHV! (I am just us
"Man is not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one!"
The program is designed to make QSOs without someone being there.
Illegal in the US, the person who put the program together could have
removed the code and left the UI. He didn't, and added a 'legal
notice' which is worth the paper it
16 matches
Mail list logo
