Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX Bug - RSTR / RSTS will be logged incorrectly..

2019-11-18 Thread Reino Talarmo
Joe informed that it is addressed in the next release. The same issue is in EU VHF contest mode. 73, Reino oh3mA ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement request

2019-11-18 Thread Grant VK5GR
Joe, Thanks for the reply - I am really pleased that the RR73 problem is in fact a bug. I can tell you that it is driving FOX operators nuts on expeditions. I guess we should have spoken up sooner. As for the band activity window, unfortunately the premise of having a well advertised channel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement request

2019-11-18 Thread Tom Ramberg via wsjt-devel
Hello Joe, thanks for the info. Awaiting 2.1.1 then! 73 de Tom, sporadically JW6VDA Sendt fra min iPhone > 18. nov. 2019 kl. 19:18 skrev Joe Taylor : > > Hi Grant and all, > > Thanks for reporting the bug in WSJT-X v2.1.0 that causes *Tx Enable* to be > turned off when Fox sends RR73. We

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX Bug - RSTR / RSTS will be logged incorrectly..

2019-11-18 Thread Dwayne Sinclair
Yes thanks - I know what is causing it. I’m reporting the issue so it gets addressed. Dwayne > On Nov 18, 2019, at 8:59 AM, Fred Price wrote: > > Look at the white space in-between your SNR to him. He sends a SNR to a > different station and it is -22. That is why the log box is incorrect.

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement request

2019-11-18 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Grant and all, Thanks for reporting the bug in WSJT-X v2.1.0 that causes *Tx Enable* to be turned off when Fox sends RR73. We knew about this issue and corrected it several months ago, back in August, but -- having received no complaints from users -- we have been waiting to issue a

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX Bug - RSTR / RSTS will be logged incorrectly..

2019-11-18 Thread Fred Price
Look at the white space in-between your SNR to him. He sends a SNR to a different station and it is -22. That is why the log box is incorrect. Is it a big could be but that is why there is an op present too make sure it is correct. On Nov 18, 2019 11:19 AM, Dwayne Sinclair wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adding "MY_RIG" info to the ADIF file when logging a QSO

2019-11-18 Thread runningerik
Hi Dave, A very good observation. If possible, I would default to the rig selection from the Settings Window -> Radio Tab -> Rig and then allow for an override. The reason is that there are a lot of rig emulations around : SDRConsole emulates a TS-2000, uBitx emulates a Yaesu FT-817, and so

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adding "MY_RIG" info to the ADIF file when logging a QSO

2019-11-18 Thread Dave Slotter, W3DJS
Would you want the ADIF log "MY_RIG" field to be populated from the Settings Window -> Radio Tab -> Rig popup? Or would you want a free-form text entry? -- Dave Slotter, W3DJS On Mon, Nov 18, 2019, 8:36 AM wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Let me clarify my request : the

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement request

2019-11-18 Thread Neil Zampella
FWIW ... we've not heard from any of the developers on this yet.   I suspect Bill and Joe may have been busy over the weekend. Wouldn't it be a good idea to first hear from them before any changes are made?    There could be a regression that crept in and they never realized, or other reason

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adding "MY_RIG" info to the ADIF file when logging a QSO

2019-11-18 Thread Claude Frantz
On 11/18/19 1:38 PM, runninge...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any interest for adding a new "My rig" (+ retain tickbox) in the Log QSO panel ? This information could then be written to the wsjtx_log.adi file and propagated to JTAlert ... A similar request can be useful for many other fields

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement request

2019-11-18 Thread Bill Barrett
Using iPod etc earphone/microphone scotch tape the earphone to the microphone so the transmitted audio feeds back to the microphone input. Configure and start 5 or more instances of WSJT-X with different call letters/frequencies as Hounds along with the Fox instance. Have the Fox call CQ and

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adding "MY_RIG" info to the ADIF file when logging a QSO

2019-11-18 Thread runningerik
Hi Tom, Let me clarify my request : the purpose is not to log the OPERATOR but MY_RIG. Today, I maintain my rig info through a manual log update and I thought it could also be useful in case of multi station ops (sharing the same log). 73's Erik ON4PB -- Message:

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement request

2019-11-18 Thread David Tiller
I’m no expert on Fox/hound, but could you use an audio file (either ‘played’ via the wsjtx menu item or via a virtual audio cable) to simulate the hounds? You could create as many hounds as you like in whatever state you need to reproduce the issue. On Nov 18, 2019, at 06:46, Grant VK5GR

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adding "MY_RIG" info to the ADIF file when logging a QSO

2019-11-18 Thread Doug Bates
I use the existing comment box in the log window to track which rig & antenna is used for the QSO. Checking the retain box keeps that info from one QSO to another. 73 all Doug Bates KV4ZY Sent from my Verizon mobile phone. On Mon, Nov 18, 2019, 8:05 AM Tom Ramberg via wsjt-devel <

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adding "MY_RIG" info to the ADIF file when logging a QSO

2019-11-18 Thread Tom Ramberg via wsjt-devel
Isn't the need for tracking which operator is on in a multiop stuation covered by "OPERATOR"? 73 de Tom OH6VDA > 18. nov. 2019 kl. 14:43 skrev runninge...@gmail.com: > > Is there any interest for adding a new "My rig" (+ retain tickbox) in the > Log QSO panel ? > > This information could

[wsjt-devel] Adding "MY_RIG" info to the ADIF file when logging a QSO

2019-11-18 Thread runningerik
Is there any interest for adding a new "My rig" (+ retain tickbox) in the Log QSO panel ? This information could then be written to the wsjtx_log.adi file and propagated to JTAlert ... I find it very useful to keep track of the transceiver which was used to make the QSO. This could also be

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement

2019-11-18 Thread Tom Ramberg via wsjt-devel
Frode, I had to re-read your Norwegian ranslation of the maual after reading your mail, so that's the reason for replying late. In that manual, I cannot see that the need for enabling TX after every RR73 is mentioned at all. Please tell me if there is a point here that I have overlooked. I

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement request

2019-11-18 Thread Grant VK5GR
Dave, To prove the fix you would probably need about 8-10 hounds in fact to see the behaviour properly and confirm it is no longer doing it. Having said that, I am sure I can round up some willing test volunteers across VK and work with you on the testing if that would help. Regards

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement

2019-11-18 Thread Grant VK5GR
Frode, As you have said you have never run FOX mode as a FOX. I can let you know that it is quite different to being a hound. I am not looking to turn it into a QSO robot and indeed if you read the logic I propose carefully and understand properly how FOX mode works you will come to see

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement

2019-11-18 Thread Frode Igland
As I read Rich's message in digest format, a response may already be given, so my apologies if I repeat a previous reply. It seems like the check box under Settings - General - "Disable Tx after sending 73" repeatedly creates some confusion. The mouse-over help text describes exactly what