d send it to me via
aa6yq (at) Ambersoft.com
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hainline [mailto:ka9...@mtcnow.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 7:20 AM
To: Dave AA6YQ
Subject: Re: radio command issue using WSJT-x
No, I have not Dave. Seems to wo
Does RI7; report which VFO is selected?
73,
Dave, AA6QY
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX [mailto:c...@omen.com]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 12:29 AM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Yaesu FT-991 CAT Codes released
vs; return
Thanks!
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: Michael Black [mailto:mdblac...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 8:12 AM
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Yaesu FT-991 CAT Codes released
Yes it does. That's not the same
No, I don't have an FT-991. That's why I asked if the RI7; command reports VFO
selection, carefully signing my post with a plausibly
mistyped callsign so as to prevent embarrassment...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: Michael Black [mailto:mdblac...
e,
> Dave...do you have an FT991? If so do you care to be a tester for
> WJST-X with hamlib changes to support it?
Yaesu might lend you one if you ask nicely ;)
>>>Experience has proven that it's faster to work with a user who has purchased
>>>one.
heir
stations to call CQ and make QSOs 24x7 until the task is complete.
+ Do we really need to wait to see whether this would cause a problem?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http
+ AA6YQ comments below
Why not. Amateur Radio was supposed to be experimental.
+ The experiment could be conducted without making it easy for users to setup
unattended 7x24 CQing and QSO completion. Think the FT8 "watering holes" are
packed now? Wait until there are several thousand unattended
AE4JY has been available for
nearly 20 years, and could be used to create an application that does in PSK31
what SQ9VFE's application does in FT8: enable unattended operation. No
developer ever took that step, presumably because they understood the damage it
could do.
the correct ADIF representation:
MFSK FT4
+ ClubLog, eQSL, and LoTW all correctly interpret this representation.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 11:05 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 and LOTW
On 31/07/2019 14:37, Serge Smirnoff R6YY via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Gentle
,
eQSL, FLE, HRD, Logger32, Log4OM, LoTW, MacLoggerDX, N3FJP, Sim31, and SwissLog.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
These
representations are only used for conveying information among applications;
they have no impact on an application's user interface or functionality.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.source
hnical accuracy. The representation chosen for JS8 in ADIF
3.0.9 was MFSK JS8 . The choice of MFSK
FT4 in ADIF 3.1.0 was consistent with the JS8 decision.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.s
story.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
ic .adif *file*
somewhere that's got EVERYBODY's logs stored chronologically?
+ No, they don't.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
are skill among software developers: focus.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
I'm not so sure it would be that easy. All of the WSJT-X modes require some
pretty rigid rules, not the least of which is fixed time frames closely locked
to the same reference. They also require
Record defined by the ADIF
specification. Other than debating the choice of UDP vs TCP what more do you
want, exactly?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
st 3 "let's define a standard set of
APIs" efforts arise but quickly fizzle. Everyone is
happy to do it -- so long as their interfaces are the ones that get
standardized.
+ If you'd like to discuss this offline, I'm happy to do so
27;s not my post.
+ "First, seek to understand".
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
behavior
>>>change, it's hard to imagine a more incompetent attempt at achieving it.
Dave, AA6YQ
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
After spending a most enjoyable week on the sunny Caribbean island of
St. L
AT commands are executed, thereby establishing an
appropriate balance between responsiveness and CPU consumption.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world'
mments in line below.
On 01/07/2017 01:50, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 8:33 PM
To: WSJT software de
That defect has been corrected in
Commander version 12.6.7; DXLab users can obtain this version by directing the
DXLab Launcher to upgrade Commander.
When running Commander version 12.6.7 with WSJT-X's Settings->Radio->Mode set
to "None", Tom KQ5S reports that k
one
second expires WSJT-X will abort with a suitable error on the basis that
the rig is not working.
+++ There may be some older transceivers that report RX/TX status via CAT
command but could take longer than 1 second to switch
state after being directed to do so. Ideally, you
You can configure TQSL to automatically “map” FT8 QSOs to DATA now, which will
enable LoTW to accept them. See
https://lotw.arrl.org/lotw-help/pref-adi/
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: Greg Beam [mailto:ki7m...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:00 PM
To: '
will get the “exact mode matches”
>>>they need.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
ons used by
both parties to a QSO should agree, Jim K9YC's suggestion below to specify a
start time of "X minutes prior to the completion time" is sensible. X can be
set to the mode's minimum QSO duration.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: m..
tents of VFO B.
This is also happening when switching bands from WSJT-X. In general it's a
DXLab UX "bug". On the other hand current WSJT-X "force
USB mode" works, because of this "bug".
+ The defect lies in the FTDX-10 CAT command implementation
28 matches
Mail list logo
