Re: [wsjt-devel] OmniRig installation

2024-06-21 Thread Alex, VE3NEA via wsjt-devel
Security as described here: (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/add-an-exclusion-to-windows-security-811816c0-4dfd-af4a-47e4-c301afe13b26#ID0EBF=Windows_11). 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2024-06-21 09:52, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Alex, I'm trying to install OmniRig on a new Windows 11

Re: [wsjt-devel] Remote WSJT

2024-02-28 Thread Alex, VE3NEA via wsjt-devel
, and the controlling app with UI would run in the shack. 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2024-02-28 13:12, Rafael Pinto via wsjt-devel wrote: William, You got the architecture right. The point is not having to render images and treat UI events, thus having all processing power for mathematical computation. X

Re: [wsjt-devel] MSK144 in jt9.exe

2024-01-08 Thread Alex, VE3NEA via wsjt-devel
Thank you, Joe! Much appreciated. 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2024-01-08 09:06, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Alex, Thanks for providing additional details.  I have merged your contribution into our 'develop' branch.  The next release of WSJT-X will include MSK144 decode capability in the jt9

Re: [wsjt-devel] MSK144 in jt9.exe

2024-01-07 Thread Alex, VE3NEA via wsjt-devel
a custom built command-line program. As I already mentioned, this does not affect the way MSK144 is decoded in WSJT-X and only adds a new option to jt9.exe for those who need it. 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2024-01-07 08:50, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Alex, Thanks for your suggested changes

[wsjt-devel] MSK144 in jt9.exe

2024-01-06 Thread Alex, VE3NEA via wsjt-devel
Hello team, I have made changes to the jt9.exe code to allow it decode MSK144. This does not affect the existing functions of WSJT-X, so it is a low risk change, and I would like it to be merged to the main branch. The modified files are attached. Do I need to do anything else to make my

Re: [wsjt-devel] Omnirig 1.19 & WSJT-X 2.0.1 55 Hz artifact

2019-05-18 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
Hello, I emailed BillG4WJS yesterday and explained why this happens. I have not heard from him yet, so here is a copy of my message. 73 Alex VE3NEA Hi Bill, I released OmniRig 1.19 about a month ago, this version solves a few problems that I faced when I started to use WSJT-X with my new

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
tead of the Fox mode if it were available. What do you think? 73 Alex VE3NEA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http

Re: [wsjt-devel] Audio input from RTP stream?

2018-03-28 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
alternatives to this solution? 73 Alex VE3NEA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ wsjt

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

2018-03-27 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
in just one evening. Thank you for your effort! 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2018-03-27 18:26, Bill Somerville wrote: On 27/03/2018 04:10, Alex, VE3NEA wrote: When I was initially experimenting with callsign highlighting, I painted all instances of the call that appeared after the last separator. I

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

2018-03-26 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
ate beyond the point of the band change. Of course, this will work only if separators are enabled. 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2018-03-26 19:34, Bill Somerville wrote: Hi Alex, thanks for reviewing the changes. Some comments in line below. On 26/03/2018 18:23, Alex, VE3NEA wrote: 1. Some developers

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

2018-03-26 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
to apply the colors only to the last instance of the call and not to add an entry to the list. 73 Alex VE3NEA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

2018-03-25 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
Hi Bill, The patch utility crashes when trying to apply this patch. Do I need to specify some extra command line switches? Maybe you could create a branch with your changes that I would check out instead? 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2018-03-25 18:52, Bill Somerville wrote: Hi Alex, I have added

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

2018-03-24 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
it will compile in Lazarus without problems. I have added schema negotiation as Bill suggested, please re-download. 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2018-03-24 06:20, Saku wrote: Alex, VE3NEA kirjoitti 23.03.2018 klo 22:41: Hello, I have written some code that allows a UDP server, e.g., a logger, to tell

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

2018-03-23 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
it if it is incomplete. My C++ code does not change the caret position, the callsign is highlighted using a temporary cursor object. 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2018-03-23 17:14, Bill Somerville wrote: On 23/03/2018 20:41, Alex, VE3NEA wrote: I have written some code that allows a UDP server, e.g., a logger

[wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

2018-03-23 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
for testing the new feature once it is included in WSJT-X. Please review and merge if OK. 73 Alex VE3NEA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link

Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition Mode Test Results

2018-03-07 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
- Of course, some Hounds did not operate as intended.  Several kept trying to raise Fox by calling below 1000 Hz. Perhaps the software should block attempts to send Tx1 below 1000 Hz if Hound mode is enabled, and show a popup message explaining why transmission did not start. 73 Alex

[wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode test results

2018-03-06 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
-04 020800 0 0.1 364 ~ W7AH RR73; KG4W -04 020800 0 0.1 424 ~ VE3NEA RR73; N2ADV -04 It is not clear if this behavior increases or decreases the QSO rate. 73 Alex VE3NEA -- Check out the vibrant tech

[wsjt-devel] Fwd: Type 2 prefix validation

2017-10-03 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
, and the first character cannot be a 0 or Q. 73 Alex VE3NEA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Re: 20 M FT8 freqs for DXpeditions? (long)

2017-08-20 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
Of course, 400W should be the average power of the amplifier, not the peak power. Splitting the power unevenly between the messages (in favor of the callers on a difficult path) may improve the peak to average power ratio. 73 Alex VE3NEA On 2017-08-20 16:15, Joe Taylor wrote: Hi Rich

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Re: 20 M FT8 freqs for DXpeditions? (long)

2017-08-20 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
be possible, which will beat all other Ham modes. 73 Alex VE3NEA P.S. Thank you for the RTTY QSO with VP8STI and VP8SGI! I tried different techniques in these pileups, but tail-ending was the only one that really worked. I used the waterfall display of CW Skimmer to track your tuning pattern, perhaps

Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpeditions - FT8, Split or not to split

2017-08-19 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
are should allow mouse-only operation, many users will appreciate it. 73 Alex VE3NEA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.lin

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT on DXpedition

2017-08-16 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
sible messages (perhaps using a C++ Enum declaration), and develop a table that defines what should be done in each stage if the given message is received, or if nothing is received. Two tables will be needed, for the DX and for the caller. Such tables will be a good basis for the state machine that

[wsjt-devel] Short QSO scenario

2017-07-26 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
s received at stage 4, then perhaps (3) should be sent a couple more times before giving up. Would it be possible to implement this scenario as a user-selected option in Auto Seq in WSJT-X? 73 Alex VE3NEA -- Check out t

Re: [wsjt-devel] Devel Build 7934 - Problems decoding

2017-07-23 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
Is this the intended behavior or something that needs to be fixed? 73 Alex VE3NEA -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot