Re: [wsjt-devel] CY9C

Thanks but I don’t have to, Lee WW2DX/CY9C is on Slack VHF channel so what I posted is right from the horses mouth. Fred N2XK > On Aug 26, 2024, at 7:13 AM, jarmo via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Mon, 26 Aug 2024 09:54:41 + > Fred Price via wsjt-devel kirjoitti: > &g

Re: [wsjt-devel] CY9C

This was from the team yesterday 8/25 early in the morning: Landed in Dingwall last night. Most of the gear is already out on the island. We hope to have some radios operational later today if all goes smoothly. So they could very well be on air already. Fred N2XK On Aug 26, 2024, at 4:56 AM, C

Re: [wsjt-devel] Decoding Anomaly

Hash code clash most likely. Plus he’s using MSHV multi stream and not F/H because he’s using normal FT8 frequencies. Fred N2XK > On Jan 29, 2024, at 5:37 PM, Dennis Younker NE6I via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Wondering if anyone else is seeing this issue. PJ5/SP9FIH is operating F/H. > When h

Re: [wsjt-devel] Show States for Grids in the Band Activity window

Hey Ed, That’s in Uwe’s fork of WSJT-X. Fred N2XK On Jan 4, 2024, at 8:01 AM, Ed Stokes via wsjt-devel wrote:  An earlier version (2.5 or 2.6?) had an option to show states within a grid in the Band Activity window . For example: 125245 Tx 648 ~ CQ W1KOK FN33 VT NY Has this feature been el

Re: [wsjt-devel] 160m S/N needs advanced mode

Glenn the new mode you want has been out for quite awhile. FST4 is that mode. However 160M ops have been slow to adopt it. I guess because it’s not a set and forget mode like FT8 is. Fred N2XK > On Dec 7, 2023, at 2:28 PM, Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Hello, > > FT8 on 160m

Re: [wsjt-devel] IC-705 little to no decodes

Linux doesn’t need any drivers added. It comes with Silicon Labs USB to UART drivers already in the OS. All you have to do is add your username to the dialout group. Matter of fact there is no need to install manufacturers drivers in Windows because all they are is old versions of Silicon Labs d

Re: [wsjt-devel] Extra characters in ALL.TXT for F/H

AP Decode see section 12.1 of User Guide wsjt.sourceforge.io [X]

Re: [wsjt-devel] Memory leak in 2.7.0 rc1?

I started 2.7.0-rc1 Windows 11 Ryzen 5 task manager shows 473mb for WSJT.exe. I then closed 2.7.0-Tx1 and opened 2.6.1 task manger shows 147mb for WSJT.exe. Both were opened on a pretty quiet 6M band. I let 2.7.0-rc1 run for around 4 hours this morning with no memory leaks. My settings for save

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx-2.7.0-rc1 .. QU1RK ? on Q65

False decode Fred N2XK > On May 24, 2023, at 10:34 AM, robert evans LAST_NAME via wsjt-devel > wrote: > >  > > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _

Re: [wsjt-devel] Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Glenn, Why not just stop the second xmit time sequence by hitting the the Enable Tx or Halt Tx button? Then re-enable xmit by hitting the Enable Tx for the next sequence you want to xmit. After all you are the control operator for your station. Also then no changes to the code need to be made.

Re: [wsjt-devel] #Bug - Frequency Tracking Error - IC9700 (and IC-7300)

Hi Kevin, I just tested my 9700 on Q65 and FT8 and my 7300 in hound mode, FT8, Q65, MSK144 and I have no problem like you do. Do you have CV-I Transcrive turned off in the menu? If not turn off and test again. Fred N2XK On Jan 16, 2023, at 3:42 PM, Kevin McQuiggin via wsjt-devel wrote:  Hi

Re: [wsjt-devel] {wsjt-devel] v2.6.0-rc5 User Guide website

Try here since the Princeton server is down for a move for WSJT-X 2.6.0-RC5 User Guide wsjt.sourceforge.io [X]

Re: [wsjt-devel] Operating question - replying to two stations simultaneously?

Its MSHV software that uses multi thread to be able to do that. It causes a lot of confusion because it looks like DXpedition mode in WSJT-X. Fred N2XK > On Dec 3, 2022, at 9:02 AM, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > While testing 2.6.0~RC5 I had a QSO which puzzled me. (FT8) > > Th

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stop Measure Reference Spectrum

Row of buttons between Log QSO and MonitorFredN2XK On Jul 19, 2022 2:17 PM, Dennis Younker NE6I via wsjt-devel wrote:Hi,  This is from 13.2 in the documentation: “WSJT-X provides a tool that can be used to determine the detailed shape of your receiver’s passband. Disconnect your antenna or tune to

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

Maybe I replied to the wrong person, sorry.However that last 73 is not needed RR73 the QSO is over. Case in point, on SSB how many DX stations send a 73 back to you? None that I've ever worked. I say 73 and the DX calls QRZed not 73. Do I log it? absolutely. Too many using FT8 think you need that 7

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

When sending RR73 the other station doesn't have to reply with a 73. The reason is that the QSO is over at RR73. A lot of stations take as much and move on.If you'd like your 73 just change the RR73 to RRR by double clicking Tx 4. Doing it this way it will not log until you receive the 73. This als

Re: [wsjt-devel] a priori

Thanks Reino but it's been changed then and not updated in the User Guide. I say this because I been using WSJT for a very long time (since 2001) and have never seen this behavior before 2.5.4. If it has been changed I'll just turn Enable AP off, problem solved.Oh I did see it in the RTTY Roundup b

[wsjt-devel] a priori

Good morning,I'm sorry I didn't have save all turned on, so I do not have a wav file to send the development group. My operating conditions:IC7300 IC9700WSJT-X 2.5.4 with two instances running. This morning one was on 80M FT8 the other on 2M MSK144.Decode on Deep with Enable AP checkedWindows 7The