I'm prepping for the WW Digi DX Contest. Reading through the documents
on the contest website I found reference to and instructions for the
"Best S+P Button." I'd be interested in trying this in the WW Digi DX
Contest, but can't get it to work. I have the instructions from the
WSJT-X 2.4 User Guid
Will you please look in 2.4 why button Best S+P do not works since earlier
versions.
If I restart wsjtx 2.4 ga and I be lucky then in ft start after a cq from
other station connect and start exchanging data.
But that is also a lower data of the ft4 because he starts always at the
right time, and th
On 28/03/2021 18:39, Harry E. Hoffman wrote:
Hi,
I am running V2.4.0-rc4 under Windows 10 Home 20H2 and I have noticed
that when running FT4 BEST S+P does not always function as expected. I
will engage the BEST S+P mode and it may or may not respond and try to
contact the strongest signal cal
Hi,
I am running V2.4.0-rc4 under Windows 10 Home 20H2 and I have noticed
that when running FT4 BEST S+P does not always function as expected. I
will engage the BEST S+P mode and it may or may not respond and try to
contact the strongest signal calling CQ that would be a NEW contact for
me. I
Still, it's nice feature, just made 2 contacts on 20m FT4 with just 4
mouse clicks.
( Enable S+P, Log QSO, Enable S+P, Log QSO ) ...
'Kari
On 7/18/19 5:28 PM, Joe wrote:
Thanks Joe,
This explanation is what I was missing!
a OK,
so then forget this button, because I'm 99.% all set up
Thanks Joe,
This explanation is what I was missing!
a OK,
so then forget this button, because I'm 99.% all set up for
contesting with the N1MM+ telling WSJT-X all that, who is dupes, who is
good, who is a new mult etc. so this S&P button is more or less don't
worry about it.
Joe WB
Joe --
On 7/18/2019 9:10 AM, Joe WB9SBD wrote:
I will double check the colors, BUT
Thinking Why should those make any difference at all anyway?
It is not just listening to all who is CQing, and then grab who is the
strongest?
Why should any of those choices below make any differen
On 18/07/2019 14:10, Joe wrote:
I will double check the colors, BUT
Thinking Why should those make any difference at all anyway?
It is not just listening to all who is CQing, and then grab who is the
strongest?
Why should any of those choices below make any difference?
Joe,
WSJT
und
it mentioned in the dev mailing list archives which mentioned
the FT4 protocol guide, which I had to use Google to find.
Would it be possible at some point to update the main
documentation to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourcef
de, which I had to use Google to find.
Would it be possible at some point to update the main
documentation to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this do?
And how does one use it?
Joe
mentioned in the dev mailing list archives which mentioned the
FT4 protocol guide, which I had to use Google to find.
Would it be possible at some point to update the main
documentation to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.n
ld it be possible at some point to update the main
documentation to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this do?
And how does one use it?
Joe
t archives which mentioned the FT4 protocol
guide, which I had to use Google to find.
Would it be possible at some point to update the main documentation
to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
which mentioned the
FT4 protocol guide, which I had to use Google to find.
Would it be possible at some point to update the main
documentation to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this d
Would it be possible at some point to update the main
documentation to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this do?
And how does one use it?
Joe
__
point to update the main
documentation to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this do?
And how does one use it?
Joe
___
wsjt-devel
d the FT4 protocol
guide, which I had to use Google to find.
Would it be possible at some point to update the main documentation
to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this do?
And
some point to update the main documentation
to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this do?
And how does one use it?
Joe
___
wsjt-devel
le to find.
Would it be possible at some point to update the main documentation
to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this do?
And how does one use it?
Joe
which mentioned the FT4 protocol guide, which I
had to use Google to find.
Would it be possible at some point to update the main documentation
to include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this d
pdate the main documentation to
include this?
*From:*Joe
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this do?
And how does one use it?
Joe
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.s
uesday, July 16, 2019 2:59 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] BEST
What does this do?
And how does one use it?
Joe
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
What does this do?
And how does one use it?
Joe
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
As wonderful technically as the software is, it would be nice if some
aspects of the S/W were more intuitive.
The SW was written by technical people for technical people.
http://www.uxdesignedge.com/2010/06/intuitive-ui-what-the-heck-is-it/
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 3:04 PM Jon Anhold wrote:
>
>
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:45 PM Joe Taylor wrote:
>
> > That seems unnecessary / counter-intuitive.
>
> Intuition can be misleading, and by itself may not provide optimum
> understanding.
>
>
Perhaps not, but it does factor into UI/UX design.
> -- Joe, K1JT
>
>
> __
On 6/15/2019 10:21, Jon Anhold KM8V wrote:
###
3. On the Settings | Colors tab, select ONLY the following: "My Call in
message", "New DXCC", "New Call on Band", "CQ in message" and
"Transmitted message" (readi
I believe I did follow these (and all other) instructions, but we'll have
to wait for the next version / mock test to find out.
Is there a reason that the colors selected would impact the Best S+P
working? That seems unnecessary / counter-intuitive.
73 de KM8V
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 4:33 PM Joe
Hi,
For me the "Best S+P" feature worked as advertised.
( Contrary to common practice I actually read and followed the
instructions shown below ... )
The problem with S+P I had was that there was this one DX station
whom I received with good SNR and who was the "best" for
me, so the program ca
Hi Jon and Uwe,
On 6/14/2019 16:10, KM8V wrote:
For what it's worth, my experience matches David's.
Multiple times I tried to "arm" Best S+P and it never called anyone, despite
eligible stations calling CQ being decoded.
On 6/14/2019 16:22, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:
Same experience here. Best S+P
Same experience here. Best S+P never ever called anyone!
73 de Uwe, DG2YCB
Von: Jon Anhold [mailto:j...@anhold.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juni 2019 22:11
An: WSJT software development
Betreff: Re: [wsjt-devel] Best S+P button
For what it's worth, my experience matches Da
For what it's worth, my experience matches David's.
Multiple times I tried to "arm" Best S+P and it never called anyone,
despite eligible stations calling CQ being decoded.
73 de KM8V
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:07 PM David Kaplan via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Thanks
Thanks Joe,
It wasn’t clear to me that eligible CQer meant one I needed. I had mistakenly
thought that as a default at the bottom of the list it would call anyone if one
I needed wasn’t available.
Please ignore my comment about the FT4_protocol file… I’m all set now, and
appreciate the clari
David --
On 6/7/2019 10:46, David Kaplan WA1OUI wrote:> If there is no station
that will give me a new multiplier/call on band/etc, will it call
anyone, or just sit there (or call CQ) as I experienced?
I gave you the whole sequence of priorities.
If a new multipler has called CQ, it calls th
Thanks for the reply.
If there is no station that will give me a new multiplier/call on band/etc,
will it call anyone, or just sit there (or call CQ) as I experienced? If this
is my problem, you might want to mention something to that effect in the
FT4_Protocol file.
David, WA1OUI
On Jun 7,
Hi David,
On 6/7/2019 7:36 AM, David Kaplan WA1OUI via wsjt-devel wrote:
Can anyone tell me how Best S+P is supposed to work, as opposed to how
it did work for me during the mock ru? Apparently I’m not alone in
having it work for me the way it did.
We may not have it coded exactly right, but
“Bump”
Can anyone tell me how Best S+P is supposed to work, as opposed to how it did
work for me during the mock ru? Apparently I’m not alone in having it work for
me the way it did.
David, WA1OUI
==
I’ll add my comments that the FT4 mock test went well.
One problem I did have, which of c
, June 05, 2019 3:06 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: David Kaplan
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Best S+P button
I’ll add my comments that the FT4 mock test went well.
One problem I did have, which of course could be operator error, was the “Best
S+P” button.
The FT4 Protocol pdf says
I’ll add my comments that the FT4 mock test went well.
One problem I did have, which of course could be operator error, was the “Best
S+P” button.
The FT4 Protocol pdf says: "Clicking this button during an Rx cycle arms the
program to examine all CQ messages decoded at the end of the 6-second R
I'm reluctant to endorse using one of these PC to rig audio adapters since they
use your computer's sound card. Thus, any computer sounds are at risk for
unintentional transmission. Many times, I've heard JT-Alerts, OS sounds, even
music and other media that an operator might be enjoying while
er, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced !
73, John de VK2XGJ
Of all the things I've ever lost,
my marbles are what I miss the most..
-Original Message-
From: RadioW9hgo
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2017 11:01 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-d
So I am confused.
Is there a good second choice for the 817 besides Signal link?
I looked at the easy-digi from KF5INZ on EBay.
I emailed him before hand and ask which one was best for the ft-817.
He gave me the link and I ordered it.
He writes me back and want to know if I am sure that's the on
Hi Joe,
Thanks, that's even better, one less thing to worry about :-)
73's
Greg, KI7MT
On 04/01/2015 12:14 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
>> For those updating / building WSPR-X sources, the KVASD download routine
>> needs to be addressed as well, ...
>
> Actually it just needs to be rem
Hi Greg,
> For those updating / building WSPR-X sources, the KVASD download routine
> needs to be addressed as well, ...
Actually it just needs to be removed. KVASD is not used by WSPR-X, and
was never a part of it.
-- Joe, K1JT
Just FYI,
For those updating / building WSPR-X sources, the KVASD download routine
needs to be addressed as well, as the current download URL points to a
non-existent location on Joe's web-site rather than pulling from the
WSJT SF kvasd-binary location(s).
FWIW, in the current SVN state, I had to
On 31/03/2015 20:54, John C. Peterson wrote:
Hi John,
> On 03/30/15 14:31, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> On 30/03/2015 20:37, John C. Peterson wrote:
>>> I'm working a cleaning up some other small problems with WSPR-X and one
>>> of them is getting the ComboBox widgets with serial port entries (for
>>>
On 03/30/15 14:31, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 30/03/2015 20:37, John C. Peterson wrote:
>> I'm working a cleaning up some other small problems with WSPR-X and one
>> of them is getting the ComboBox widgets with serial port entries (for
>> CAT, PTT) to have entries that are meaningful for the given
On 03/30/15 14:31, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 30/03/2015 20:37, John C. Peterson wrote:
> Hi John,
>> I'm working a cleaning up some other small problems with WSPR-X and one
>> of them is getting the ComboBox widgets with serial port entries (for
>> CAT, PTT) to have entries that are meaningful fo
On 30/03/2015 20:37, John C. Peterson wrote:
Hi John,
> I'm working a cleaning up some other small problems with WSPR-X and one
> of them is getting the ComboBox widgets with serial port entries (for
> CAT, PTT) to have entries that are meaningful for the given target
> platform (e.g. MACX, UNIX or
I'm working a cleaning up some other small problems with WSPR-X and one
of them is getting the ComboBox widgets with serial port entries (for
CAT, PTT) to have entries that are meaningful for the given target
platform (e.g. MACX, UNIX or WIN32).
On WIN32, meaningful entries would be COM1... while
49 matches
Mail list logo
