After unchecking Call 1st, it's sometimes still active for the first couple
of CQ calls and populates everything and responds to an unwanted CQ.
Eventually, it does as requested, but then after a slot change, it again
answers even though unchecked.
--
George - WB5JJJ
4
_
Hi All
When Call 1st is unmarked WSJT-X-rc1 are doing what it's surposed to do
- answer nothing as shown at the attached picture.
73 de Michael 5p1kzx
Den 15-05-2020 kl. 23:03 skrev Martin Davies G0HDB:
On 15 May 2020 at 11:01, WB5JJJ wrote:
I've noticed in rc1 that when i UNCHECK Call 1st
On 15 May 2020 at 11:01, WB5JJJ wrote:
> I've noticed in rc1 that when i UNCHECK Call 1st it continues to connect to
> the 1st caller for a couple of CQ cycles and then ignores all incoming
> requests as expected.
>
> --
> George - WB5JJJ
Hi George (and all), I haven't yet tried the latest v2.2
I've noticed in rc1 that when i UNCHECK Call 1st it continues to connect to
the 1st caller for a couple of CQ cycles and then ignores all incoming
requests as expected.
--
George - WB5JJJ
4
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
I'm using v2.0.0-rc5 737d2f on a PC running 32-bit Win 7 Pro (with all SPs and
updates).
I've been having a dabble in the FT8 Roundup - what great fun it is! - and came
across an
oddity this morning...
In normal FT8 operation I don't use the 'Call 1st' option and always leave it
unticked but
Thanks Mike
I will download the current source and have a play.
Basic programming stuff is OK - the QT display stuff is a whole new area for me.
Regards
Tom
GM8MJV
On 26 Jun 2018, at 15:07, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
wrote:
> Nope...no todo list
>
> If you want to test a fix try mo
Nope...no todo list
If you want to test a fix try modifying
void MainWindow::on_actionFT8_triggered()
And add this line after the displayWidgets call.
ui->cbFirst->setChecked(m_settings->value("CallFirst",true).toBool());
This will restore the checkbox to your saved settings.
Mike
On
do configurations.
>
> Life will be good...
>
> 73,
> Ted
> K9IMM
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Melvin [mailto:t...@tkrh.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 8:32 AM
> To: WSJT software development
> Subject: [wsjt-devel] Call 1st Bug Fix
>
are development
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Call 1st Bug Fix
Hi All
Is there a 'to do' list that is visible outside the dev team?
The annoying bug where you loose 'call 1st' - would like to see where (if at
all) is in the system.
OS. Windows 7
WSJT Version - every version since abou
Hi All
Is there a ‘to do’ list that is visible outside the dev team?
The annoying bug where you loose ‘call 1st’ - would like to see where (if at
all) is in the system.
OS. Windows 7
WSJT Version - every version since about 1.8rc1
To simulate:
In FT8 mode make sure 'Call 1st’ is ticked.
Chan
Hi all,
Not sure if this is something new, but I was calling CQ on 20m this
morning, and had the Call 1st box checked. I was on for about an hour
or so, and removed the Call 1st as I wanted to select the next station
since I was getting a few replies at the same time.
In any case, I uncheck
Good day
There is an issue with having call 1st ticked in FT8, then change mode to JT65,
when return to FT8 then call is un-ticked.
I have been caught out a few times now, increased interest in other modes has
meant I have been jumping around looking at other modes - when I return to FT8
keep
When in the pile-up I use to answer first to the weakest signal
it is more fun and avoids the rush to high powers.
...so please add "Call weaker" to the 1.8 for FT8.
Best 73
Pino ZP4KFX
--
Check out the vibrant tec
al Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 6:53 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Call 1st
Hi all,
I had not intended the "Weak" checkbox to be visible, just yet. Its function
is not yet implemented.
Code revision
Hi Joe,
I agree with John - using r7836, it worked great for three QSO’s I just made.
This makes it MUCH easier to get a QSO going - thanks!
One surprise was that it responded to a Tx1 made off-frequency compared to my
CQ call, but when I think about it that should be the correct behavior.
U
Tnx John!
On 7/10/2017 10:15 AM, John Nelson wrote:
Hi Joe,
r7835 with revised Call 1st is working correctly..
— John G4KLA
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slas
Hi Joe,
r7835 with revised Call 1st is working correctly..
— John G4KLA
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
__
Hi all,
I had not intended the "Weak" checkbox to be visible, just yet. Its
function is not yet implemented.
Code revision 7835 is yet another attempt to get the "Call 1st" logic
just right. I think it should now do the following:
1. Decodes containing "MyCall" or falling within 10 Hz of R
18 matches
Mail list logo
