Laurie
have you considered adding other modes for WAS track? or was it always
JT65/JT9?
-- Original Message --
From: "Laurie, VK3AMA" <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net>
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 7/11/2017 1:19:51 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Distribution
On 12
On 12/07/2017 4:10 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
RR, Laurie. My mistake as mentioned in the other post. I will claim I
did it so developers of other software get a head start.
BTW I did some basic tests with JTAlert using it to initiate MSK144
and FT8 QSOs from alerts. This was necessary as I
On 11/07/2017 18:24, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
I bet, most people are running r7843 (as am I) because Sourceforge
sent an announcement email (to subscribers) that the rc1 installer was
available for download.
RR, Laurie. My mistake as mentioned in the other post. I will claim I
did it so
will leave Joes version r7843 running but can always close it if
prefered and make one from JTSDK
Regards Richard G7OED
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:07 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Distribution
On 11/07
On 11/07/2017 12:35, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote:
Please be advised that there are some enterprising souls sharing links directly
to Sourceforge distributing the Release Candidate files all over social media.
Seeing posts crop up everywhere.
Hi James,
I'm afraid it is worse than that,
Please be advised that there are some enterprising souls sharing links directly
to Sourceforge distributing the Release Candidate files. There have been posts
all over Facebook so far and people are downloading like crazy.
Please be advised that there are some enterprising souls sharing links directly
to Sourceforge distributing the Release Candidate files all over social media.
Seeing posts crop up everywhere.
--
Check out the vibrant
