their own info
... and the rest of us have to hunt it down and deal with any conflicts.
73
Gary ZL2iFB
-Original Message-
From: Ned Stearns
Sent: Sunday, 22 July 2018 1:23 a.m.
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 DXpedition mode frequencies
Claude,
I recommend
> On Jul 21, 2018, at 4:37 AM, Claude Frantz
> wrote:
>
> What are, at the present time, the recommended operation frequencies for
> the FT8 DXpedition mode ?
The DXpedition announces what frequency they will be on. There’s no set
frequency, as long as it isn’t on the normal FT8 frequencies
Claude,
I recommend that you use the same frequency plan as the upcoming Kosovo
FT8 DXpedition, Z66X. The team followed the recent Baker Island
frequency plan with the exception of the change to the 6 meter frequency
to 50.323 MHz (which was based upon our recommendation). The one concern
wit
Hi All,
What are, at the present time, the recommended operation frequencies for
the FT8 DXpedition mode ?
Best wishes,
Claude (DJ0OT)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech site
Hi all,
The WSJT-X web site now has translations of the FT8 DXpedition Mode User
Guide into German and Polish:
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html
Thanks to Enrico Schürrer, OE1EQW, and Piotr Stuła, SP9TTG, for these
translations!
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
-
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 10:06 PM, Mike Lavelle wrote:
>
> But I did not get my RR73 until ***20 minutes*** after I sent my signal
> report !
This explains why I never saw any responses. Since I was fighting other
gremlins, I didn’t wait long enough to get a response after the initial one. I
It appears that when the fox gets busy, its response can be greatly delayed,
which leads to wasted extra calls from the hounds trying for a roger from the
fox.
As others mentioned, perhaps the fox should give rogers higher priority than
signal reports to newer hounds.
(Also, maybe the hounds
Do you guys want reports of odd things seen during the DXPedition test today on
this list?
Dave / NX6D
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.lin
On 20/02/2018 08:24, PTAa wrote:
Hi,
I wonder what the rationale behind this is:
"Hounds acknowledge having been called and send their “R+rpt” message
at a randomly selected frequency between 300 and 900 Hz."
If I was heard by the Fox on a certain freq., would it not be best to
continue the
Thanks, Joe.
This sounds good.
73,
Per-Tore / LA7NO
On 20 February 2018 at 15:03, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Per-Tore,
>
> On 2/20/2018 3:24 AM, PTAa LA7NO wrote:
>
>> I wonder what the rationale behind this is:
>>
>> "Hounds acknowledge having been called and send their “R+rpt” message at
>> a r
Hi Per-Tore,
On 2/20/2018 3:24 AM, PTAa LA7NO wrote:
I wonder what the rationale behind this is:
"Hounds acknowledge having been called and send their “R+rpt” message at
a randomly selected frequency between 300 and 900 Hz."
If I was heard by the Fox on a certain freq., would it not be best
Hi,
I wonder what the rationale behind this is:
"Hounds acknowledge having been called and send their “R+rpt” message at a
randomly selected frequency between 300 and 900 Hz."
If I was heard by the Fox on a certain freq., would it not be best to
continue the QSO on the same freq?
Keep up the g
Hi Joe and Per-Tore,
The higher portions of FT8 subbands may be called pile-up, as usual when we
call a rare DX on the HF bands.
I'm grateful for all your endeavours Joe and the team!
GL de HA6NN
Andras
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Per-Tore,
>
> On 2/9/2018 5:24 PM,
Hi Per-Tore,
On 2/9/2018 5:24 PM, PTAa LA7NO wrote:
I wonder what the rationale behind this is:
"Hounds acknowledge having been called and send their “R+rpt” message at
a randomly selected frequency between 300 and 900 Hz."
If I was heard by the Fox on a certain freq., would it not be best t
Hi,
I wonder what the rationale behind this is:
"Hounds acknowledge having been called and send their “R+rpt” message at a
randomly selected frequency between 300 and 900 Hz."
If I was heard by the Fox on a certain freq., would it not be best to
continue the QSO on the same freq?
Keep up the go
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your comments and suggestions.
On 2/9/2018 5:10 AM, Richard Lamont G4DYA wrote:
So there's no need for the Fox to transmit FT8S-type signals using
multiple tones. It would be possible to use a new modulation scheme, for
the Fox only, which uses the whole of the SSB channe
On 02/02/18 17:53, Joe Taylor wrote:
> You have probably heard something about recent efforts to develop a
> special "FT8 DXpedition Mode" in WSJT-X. This message aims to bring you
> up-to-date on our progress, and generally to make our plans more widely
> known.
Hi Joe. Thanks for this.
For th
Hi all,
This is an update to my message with the same heading posted here on
February 2.
A new version of the FT8 DXpedition Mode User Guide is now available:
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT8_DXpedition_Mode.pdf
The document has considerably more detail than before, including an F
ge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8 DXpedition Mode
Hi all,
You have probably heard something about recent efforts to develop a
special "FT8 DXpedition Mode" in WSJT-X. This message aims to bring you
up-to-date on our progress, and generally
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 5:53 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8 DXpedition Mode
Hi all,
You have probably heard something about recent efforts to develop a
special "FT8 DXpedition Mode" in WSJT-X. This me
Hi all,
You have probably heard something about recent efforts to develop a
special "FT8 DXpedition Mode" in WSJT-X. This message aims to bring you
up-to-date on our progress, and generally to make our plans more widely
known.
The basic goal of *FT8 DXpedition Mode* is to enable DXpeditions
21 matches
Mail list logo
