Hi Joe, Bill,
On 10/17/2014 06:15 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 18/10/2014 00:56, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
Hi Greg,
About a possible common library:
I would like to see any common libraries built with CMake, this is
because CMake has powerful tools for exporting library code for use in
Hi all,
Bill responded to a recent query on wsjtgroup about the use of compound
callsigns.
As we all know, these are bit of a nuisance in JT65, JT9, and JT4, in
part because of the need to maintain backward compatibility with the
original JT65 protocol specification, defined more than ten
On 17/10/2014 20:25, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Joe,
Bill responded to a recent query on wsjtgroup about the use of compound
callsigns.
As we all know, these are bit of a nuisance in JT65, JT9, and JT4, in
part because of the need to maintain backward compatibility with the
original JT65
Hi Bill,
Of course, a savvy user would edit the automatically generated message
so that N8PR ZL/KE4PT is sent. That's a legal message, because ZL
is one of the 339 standard prefixes defined in pfx.f90. They are
legitimate for the compound-callsign messages we call Type 1 in the
WSJT-X User
On 17/10/2014 21:52, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Bill,
Hi Joe,
Of course, a savvy user would edit the automatically generated message
so that N8PR ZL/KE4PT is sent. That's a legal message, because ZL
is one of the 339 standard prefixes defined in pfx.f90. They are
legitimate for the
Hello All,
On 10/17/2014 02:05 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 17/10/2014 20:25, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Joe,
Bill responded to a recent query on wsjtgroup about the use of compound
callsigns.
As we all know, these are bit of a nuisance in JT65, JT9, and JT4, in
part because of the
Hi Greg,
About a possible common library:
I would like to see any common libraries built with CMake, this is
because CMake has powerful tools for exporting library code for use in
other CMake built projects. This doesn't make them any less useful for
non-CMake projects.
Unless you plan on
On 18/10/2014 00:56, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
Hi Greg,
About a possible common library:
I would like to see any common libraries built with CMake, this is
because CMake has powerful tools for exporting library code for use in
other CMake built projects. This doesn't make them any less
Hi Bill and Greg,
Of course you are correct but I see Greg's point too. I expect he is
concerned about the complexities of delivering an application on Linux
for example where the whole thing must be built from sources plus
existing packages. A statement like Building the library would be a
