RE: Namespaces are ignored in SerializerToXML...

2001-07-25 Thread Michel Lehon
Joseph, > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >And the SerializerToXML.startPrefixMapping method is still empty so I > >guess it did not fix the problem. > > The fact that the serializer ignores the start/endPrefixMapping calls > doesn't necessarily mean it "ignores namespaces"

[Bug 2818] - Transformation of DOMSource not working.

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2818

[Bug 2818] - Transformation of DOMSource not working.

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2818

[Bug 2818] - Transformation of DOMSource not working.

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2818

[Bug 2818] - Transformation of DOMSource not working.

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2818

[Bug 2818] - Transformation of DOMSource not working.

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2818

[Bug 2639] - IndexOutOfBoundsException

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2639

cvs commit: xml-xalan/java/src/org/apache/xalan/serialize WriterToUTF8Buffered.java

2001-07-25 Thread garyp
garyp 01/07/25 23:28:55 Modified:java/src/org/apache/xalan/serialize WriterToUTF8Buffered.java Log: Fix bugzilla bug 2639 (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2639) where buffer was overflowing because the expansion of the Unicode characters

[Bug 2818] - Transformation of DOMSource not working.

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2818

[Bug 2818] New: - Transformation of DOMSource not working.

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2818

Newbie : Help with xpath - how to return NodeList ?

2001-07-25 Thread peter
Does anybody know where I can get an example of a VC++ XPath routine that returns a NodeList ? Please provide anything with a *concrete* source code example, thanks. Why ? I'm quite a newbie at VC++ and there's only so much geek talk that I can handle :) I've done advanced XPath in Xalan-Java. Un

Re: Spaces in XSL documents cause problems inside tags

2001-07-25 Thread Gary L Peskin
Hmmm. I just tried a quick example and it worked fine under 2.2.D6. Can you report this in bugzilla at http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ and attach working XML and XSLT that demonstrate the problem. Gary > "Waluk, Michael" wrote: > > This Xalan version 2.2.D6 causes problems in HTML output w

register slot allocation redesign

2001-07-25 Thread John Howard
Hi all! In relation to a bug I entered (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2699), I'm formulating a patch and wanted to do a quick run-by for anyone that can suggest an alternative (better) approach: It appears that XSLTC doesn't perform JVM register slot allocation in an organize

RE: XSL, Schemas, xalan

2001-07-25 Thread Pinto, Michelle
Ok will do, thanks Gary. Regards, Michelle Pinto > -Original Message- > From: Gary L Peskin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 5:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: XSL, Schemas, xalan > > Michelle -- > > You'd probably be better off asking this

Re: XSL, Schemas, xalan

2001-07-25 Thread Gary L Peskin
Michelle -- You'd probably be better off asking this on the Mulberry list. We are pretty focused on Xalan development and Xalan-specific problems and don't always have the time to delve into issues like this. You can subscribe to the Mulberry list and search the archives and some excellent FAQ

RE: XSL, Schemas, xalan

2001-07-25 Thread Pinto, Michelle
Hi, I have a question regarding xalan, XSL and schemas. Any pointers will be appreciated. Thanks for any help. Apologize if this is wrong mailing list. I am trying to generate an XML instance given its XML schema file and a XSL file using xalan-j_2_2_D7, testing this using java org.apache.xalan.

[Bug 2807] New: - Exception thrown when no CDATA section present

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2807

[Bug 2664] - de.fub.bytecode.generic.ClassGenException: Branch target offset too large for short throwen when Transforms reach a size certain complexity... In this case 65K

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2664

Spaces in XSL documents cause problems inside tags

2001-07-25 Thread Waluk, Michael
Title: Spaces in XSL documents cause problems inside tags This Xalan version 2.2.D6 causes problems in HTML output when tags contain carriage returns and spaces in the XSL file.   Previous versions of Xalan ignored the spaces, but this one doesn't seem too.  We have had to edit hundreds of X

Xalan C++

2001-07-25 Thread Backovska Helena
Hallo, woult it be possible to provide builds for RM - Unix Reliant 5.43 ? Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.: +43 5 1707 47247

[Bug 2805] New: - xsltc fails conf test math94 returning 0 instead of NaN

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2805

[Bug 2804] New: - xsltc fails math105 which has value-of select="9876543210"

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2804

Re: SAX2DTM documentation

2001-07-25 Thread Joseph_Kesselman
Good start... It'd probably be worth turning this into a principles-of-operation section hanging off http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/dtm.html, if we can find the time.

[Bug 2803] New: - xsltc fails conf test match15

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803

RE: Namespaces are ignored in SerializerToXML...

2001-07-25 Thread Joseph_Kesselman
>And the SerializerToXML.startPrefixMapping method is still empty so I >guess it did not fix the problem. The fact that the serializer ignores the start/endPrefixMapping calls doesn't necessarily mean it "ignores namespaces". All the information _should_ be available from the startElement and en

[Bug 2802] New: - Unimplemented interface method: tFactory.newTransformer(xslSource)

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2802

[Bug 2801] New: - xsltc fails conf test lre21 by copying ext namespace to lre

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2801

[Bug 1506] - xsltc ingores exclude-result-prefixes attribute of LRE

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1506

[Bug 2794] New: - xsltc fails conf test lre12, no warning and <>

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2794

RE: migrating from xalan 1.x to xalan 2.x

2001-07-25 Thread Gunnlaugur Thor Briem
I have very recently performed such migration myself; here's a tiny (but in my opinion sufficient) treatise on the subject: rewrite all of your current Xalan 1.0 invocation code to use the TrAX API instead. There is a plethora of sample code for using the TrAX API at http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/

migrating from xalan 1.x to xalan 2.x

2001-07-25 Thread Noel L Yap
Does anyone know of any resources describing what needs to be done to migrate from xalan 1.x to xalan 2.x? Thanks, Noel This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official

cvs commit: xml-xalan/test build.bat build.xml test.properties

2001-07-25 Thread curcuru
curcuru 01/07/25 11:29:17 Added: test build.bat build.xml test.properties Log: Create new test compile/execution methodology build.bat/build.xml are used to both compile and execute tests test.properties are defaults for testing properties Revision ChangesPath

cvs commit: xml-xalan/test/java/src/org/apache/qetest/xsl XSLTestAntTask.class XSLTestAntTask.java

2001-07-25 Thread curcuru
curcuru 01/07/25 11:28:13 Modified:test/java/src/org/apache/qetest/xsl XSLTestAntTask.class XSLTestAntTask.java Log: Upgrade to new test compile/execution methodology Now use QetestUtils as a test launcher, which helps with classpath issues Also added wri

[Bug 2639] - IndexOutOfBoundsException

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2639

Re: Bug 2639

2001-07-25 Thread Gary L Peskin
I'll committ it as soon as I can -- sometime today. Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I'm leaning toward the second alternative since I think that non-ASCII > > characters occur relatively infrequently (at least for me) and I hate to > pay the > > penalty for a multiply on every write. > > G

RE: Namespaces are ignored in SerializerToXML...

2001-07-25 Thread Myriam_Midy
OK. I knew the patch wasn't in but so much code has changed that I was hoping it was fixed as a result of that. We'll take a look at that. Thanks. Myriam "Michel Lehon"

Re: Bug 2639

2001-07-25 Thread Scott_Boag
> I'm leaning toward the second alternative since I think that non-ASCII > characters occur relatively infrequently (at least for me) and I hate to pay the > penalty for a multiply on every write. Gary, I agree. -scott

Re: Xalan with GCC 2.96 rel 85

2001-07-25 Thread David_N_Bertoni
The latest code in CVS has a work-around for this problem. If you want to try to build with the 1.1 sources, then just change the class Stylesheet so that it derives publically from PrefixResolver. By the way, you do not need the STLport with GCC. The compiler comes with its own standard libra

RE: Namespaces are ignored in SerializerToXML...

2001-07-25 Thread Michel Lehon
Sorry... English is not my primary language. I meant It did not help, so no the problem is not fixed in D7. I looked at the code the patch fixed and the patch is still not applied in D7. However, I could not (yet) check that the xmlns:java is passed as an attribute. Michel. > -Original Mess

RE: Namespaces are ignored in SerializerToXML...

2001-07-25 Thread Myriam_Midy
Sorry, but I'm not sure what you mean. Were you able to recreate the problem or did you have trouble running 2.2D7? Myriam "Michel Lehon"

RE: Namespaces are ignored in SerializerToXML...

2001-07-25 Thread Michel Lehon
Well I tried with the 2.2D6 and D7 without much success... And the SerializerToXML.startPrefixMapping method is still empty so I guess it did not fix the problem. Michel. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 25 July, 2001 17:32 > To

Re: Namespaces are ignored in SerializerToXML...

2001-07-25 Thread Myriam_Midy
Has anyone tried reproducing the problem with the latest code (2.2D7)? Is the problem still there? Myriam "Michel Lehon"

Re: [Bug 2776] New: - apply-templates without select doubles position()

2001-07-25 Thread Joseph_Kesselman
Standard question: Did you remember to allow for (or explicitly suppress) the whitespace between elements?

[GUMP] Xalan2 Smoketest Failure

2001-07-25 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml prepare: compile: [echo] compile ent

[Bug 2776] - apply-templates without select doubles position()

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2776

Re: Is really a reserved element name ??

2001-07-25 Thread Erwin Bolwidt
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Gary L Peskin wrote: > Erwin Bolwidt wrote: > > I don't really understand. The extension function is generating XML in > > some format, which is not XHTML or HTML4 or anything close. So you cannot > > directly embed the result of the extension function in the result tree. > >

Namespaces are ignored in SerializerToXML...

2001-07-25 Thread Michel Lehon
Hi, Some time ago (18/6/01) bug report http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1831 was filled with a proposal fix (it was not applied yep :( ). However the fix does not solve the complete issue, or it behaves wierd in some cases highlighting a problem that is somewhere else (and that

[Bug 2776] - apply-templates without select doubles position()

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2776

[Bug 2776] - apply-templates without select doubles position()

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2776

[Bug 2772] - XPath not locating nodes in default namespace

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2772

Re: Possible Bug in not

2001-07-25 Thread Gary L Peskin
Chris -- I have tried this with both XalanJ 2.2.D6 and the latest CVS build and found no problems with either. If you are able to create a reproducible problem, please report this on bugzilla at http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ and attach your complete XML and XSLT or actual working files that

Re: Is really a reserved element name ??

2001-07-25 Thread Gary L Peskin
Erwin Bolwidt wrote: > I don't really understand. The extension function is generating XML in > some format, which is not XHTML or HTML4 or anything close. So you cannot > directly embed the result of the extension function in the result tree. No, the extension function is generating DOM objects

SAX2DTM documentation

2001-07-25 Thread Gary L Peskin
Don, Scott, Joe et al -- I just committed test/tests/contrib/garypeskin/SAX2DTMDesign.html which is an HTML page that gives the basics regarding some of the arrays used in SAX2DTM. This is what I find that I need for debugging and I left off the stuff that was obvious to me, like what is in m_fi

cvs commit: xml-xalan/test/tests/contrib/garypeskin SAX2DTMDesign.html

2001-07-25 Thread garyp
garyp 01/07/24 23:24:37 Added: test/tests/contrib/garypeskin SAX2DTMDesign.html Log: Adding this for possible inclusion into some documentation somewhere. Revision ChangesPath 1.1 xml-xalan/test/tests/contrib/garypeskin/SAX2DTMDesign.html Index:

cvs commit: xml-xalan/test/tests/contrib/garypeskin namespace99.xsl namespace99.xml namespace99.out

2001-07-25 Thread garyp
garyp 01/07/24 23:24:00 Added: test/tests/contrib/garypeskin namespace99.xsl namespace99.xml namespace99.out Log: Test for situation where an attribute with a namespace precedes the first text node. Revision ChangesPath 1.1 xm

cvs commit: xml-xalan/java/src/org/apache/xml/dtm/ref/sax2dtm SAX2DTM.java

2001-07-25 Thread garyp
garyp 01/07/24 23:22:41 Modified:java/src/org/apache/xml/dtm/ref/sax2dtm SAX2DTM.java Log: Fix bug 2727 (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2727). Attributes which contain a namespace prefix are indicated by placing a negative number in the appropriate entry in t

[Bug 2727] - Identity transformation produces non well-formed output

2001-07-25 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2727

Xalan with GCC 2.96 rel 85

2001-07-25 Thread Allan Stirrett
Hi, As this is my first post, I'm hoping I'm in the right place. Please forgive me & point me in the right direction if this is misdirected. I'm runing RedHat 7.1 which, as you may know, unfortunately comes with GCC 2.96 (currently at release 85). I was having trouble compiling