- Original Message -
From: "Kimbro Staken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
> There's a big difference between stating a respectful opinion and stat
it for fun.
--
THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #59
I will never build a sentient computer smarter than I am.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Borden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: Proble
er smarter than I am.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Borden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
> Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> > - Original Message -
>
Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jonathan Borden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
>
>
>
> > Err, so "
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Borden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
> Exactly, the XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 data models have merged. If XML:DB is
Jim Tivy wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> This thread has got me thinking. What is returned from a query is a
value.
> What is a legal value should be defined in the API spec. XQuery has
define
> what a legal value is in their data model doc (see w3c data model doc).
It
> may be wise to adopt this as a val
Jim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Dare Obasanjo
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 7:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
>
>
> The valid return types from an XQuery
2, 2002 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
> Hi folks
>
> This thread has got me thinking. What is returned from a query is a value.
> What is a legal value should be defined in the API spec. XQuery has define
> what a legal value is in their data model doc (see
With Implementing XMLDB API
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jonathan Borden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
>
>
>
> > E
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Borden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
> Err, so "addResource" on a BinaryResource is OK _from an interface poi
> >
> > so? you also cannot store a book where SQL expects an int.
> >
>
> Now I'm confused.
>
> What _good_ RDBMS API have you used that allows you to pass types that
aren't
> natively supported by the DB in update operations?
> Just to recap I'll rewrite
> the query that Kimbro agreed didn't mak
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Borden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
>
> so? you also cannot store a book where SQL expects an int.
>
Now I
> The problem with this approach is that you have now created a Resource
that
> cannot be used in other situations where implementors of the Resource
> interface can such as
>
> storeResource(Resource res)
> Stores the provided resource into the database.
>
> in the Collection interface,
Actually rather than.
>
> interface SimpleTypeResource extends Resource {
> const STRING_TYPE = 1;
> const INTEGER_TYPE = 2;
> const FLOAT_TYPE = 3;
> const DATE_TYPE = 4;
> int getType();
> String getString();
> void setString();
> Integer getInteger() throws cast..
- Original Message -
From: "Kimbro Staken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
> You're right in many cases that won't make sense, that doesn't ha
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
> Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>
> >
> > From the point of view of an implementor the XPathService returns
> Resources
> > within ResourceSets and this is way t
Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>
> From the point of view of an implementor the XPathService returns
Resources
> within ResourceSets and this is way too coarse grained. In fact I feel the
> concept of making ResourceSets the return value of XPath queries is a bad
idea
> for a few reasons
>
> 1.) It is incon
rom: "Lars Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 02:16:46 -0700
Kimbro Staken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday, January 10, 2002, at 11:04
ike even the odds to give the
other guy a sporting chance.
-
Original Message -
From: "Lars Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 02:1
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 02:16:46 -0700
Kimbro Staken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 10, 2002, at 11:04 PM, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> >
> >
> > From the point of view of an implementor the XPathService returns
> > Resources
> > within ResourceSets and this is way too coarse grained.
On Thursday, January 10, 2002, at 11:04 PM, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
From the point of view of an implementor the XPathService returns
Resources
within ResourceSets and this is way too coarse grained. In fact I feel the
concept of making ResourceSets the return value of XPath queries is a bad
idea
- Original Message -
From: "Kimbro Staken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Problems With Implementing XMLDB API
> > It seems that somewhere along the line whoever d
On Thursday, January 10, 2002, at 06:57 PM, John Merrells wrote:
It seems that somewhere along the line whoever designed the XML:DB API
decided
that XPath queries should return ResourceSets which seem to map to very
coarse
grained database objects like XML documents and BLOBs even though XPath
qu
On Thursday, January 10, 2002, at 09:37 PM, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on implementing Core Level 0 compliance over an NXD as
part of
a project I'm working on and have bumped against a problem.
Please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for discussions about the
API.
It seems
24 matches
Mail list logo
