Fwd: [Xastir] KPC-9612+

2007-06-12 Thread Lee Bengston
rial1.present = "TRUE" serial1.fileName = "COM2" serial1.autodetect = "FALSE" Mentioning this in the Wiki is right on the money. Regards, Lee - K5DAT Murphy, TX -- Forwarded message -- From: Lee Bengston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 12, 2007 3:27 PM

Re: [Xastir] KPC-9612+

2007-06-12 Thread Lee Bengston
On 6/12/07, Jason Winningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had this and similar issues with VMware during my limited dealings with it. I gave up guessing and just statically configured VMware to assign the ports to the VM, as per the wiki instructions. Life got much easier at that point. Yea

Re: [Xastir] KPC-9612+

2007-06-12 Thread Jason Winningham
On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Tom Russo wrote: It could be the case that VMware thinks that the modem is COM1 or something bizarre like that, so it assigns /dev/ttyS0 on the linux side to COM2 on the Losedows side. I had this and similar issues with VMware during my limited dealings wit

Re: [Xastir] KPC-9612+

2007-06-12 Thread Tom Russo
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:27:50AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Lee Bengston wrote: > > > Curiously, based on the Xastir/Linux settings, I was expecting the Linux > > port to map to COM1 in Windows, but it'

Re: [Xastir] KPC-9612+

2007-06-12 Thread Lee Bengston
On 6/12/07, Curt, WE7U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What port did you use from Linux? /dev/ttyS0 or /dev/ttyS1? Linux/Unix typically start numbering their ports at 0, not 1. /dev/ttyS0 -> COM1 /dev/ttyS1 -> COM2 etc. Yes, I saw that in the How-To's - the interface I set up in XASTIR for the D

Re: [Xastir] KPC-9612+

2007-06-12 Thread Curt, WE7U
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Lee Bengston wrote: > Curiously, based on the Xastir/Linux settings, I was expecting the Linux > port to map to COM1 in Windows, but it's actually using COM2. It's probably > something simple like VMware thinks COM1 is already in use for some reason. What port did you use

Re: [Xastir] KPC-9612+

2007-06-12 Thread Lee Bengston
On 6/11/07, Jeremy Utley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As I remember it, the KPC-9612 is an odd beast - it's a dual-port TNC (both 1200 & 9600 baud modems in it). Xastir can't directly speak to both ports at once via KISS as far as I know - you might be able to get it to work without KISS. You co

Re: [Xastir] KPC-9612+

2007-06-11 Thread Jeremy Utley
As I remember it, the KPC-9612 is an odd beast - it's a dual-port TNC (both 1200 & 9600 baud modems in it). Xastir can't directly speak to both ports at once via KISS as far as I know - you might be able to get it to work without KISS. You could also set up Linux's AX.25 support directly, using

[Xastir] KPC-9612+

2007-06-11 Thread Lee Bengston
Hi, if I want to use Xastir with a KPC-9612+ (1200 baud port), should I just pretend it is a KPC3+ from Xastir's perspective? Fyi, being both a new Xastir user and the owner of about a 5 week old TH-D7A, I finally made the cable and connected the handheld to the desktop computer here at home. It