Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Wrong DOCTYPE

2005-02-07 Thread Andrew Stevens
CC'd xdoclet-user, where this should have gone originally... On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 16:55, Miriam Senovilla wrote: > Hi!!! > > I'm trying to generate an EJB by Xdoclet, but it's generated with a > wrong doctype. ... > destDir="src" verbose="true" addedTags="@xdoclet-generated at > ${TODAY},@copy

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xdoclet/xdocs valueobjects.xml,1.12,1.13

2005-02-07 Thread Andrew Stevens
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/xdocs In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv25616 Modified Files: valueobjects.xml Log Message: More typos (XDT-1267). Index: valueobjects.xml === RCS file: /cvsroot/xdoc

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] First reference to merge directory

2005-02-07 Thread Matthias Germann
Hi Miriam, You can set the mergeDir attribute for the ejbdoclet ant task or the deploymentdescriptor subtask (see http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/ant/xdoclet/modules/ejb/EjbDocletTask.html). This is the mailing list for the xdoclet developpers. Please ask further questions about the usag

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] tapestry support for XDoclet

2005-02-07 Thread Craig Walls
+1. This looks like really good stuff. I've become quite a Tapestry fanatic lately and I might find this module useful. One thing I would ask for in addition to what this patch contains is to include an xtags.xml file to document all of the Tapestry-specific tags. Newcomb, Michael P. wrote: I'm

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Wrong DOCTYPE

2005-02-07 Thread Frank Langelage
Miriam Senovilla wrote: But when i run xdoclet, it makes the ejb-jar.xml version 3.2: http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss_3_2.dtd";> How can i specify that i want 4.0 version??? I'm using Jboss 4.0.1, Eclipse, Xdoclet 1.2.2 Thanks support for the correct JBoss 4.0 doctype was added in septemb

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] tapestry support for XDoclet

2005-02-07 Thread Matt Raible
+1 - I was just thinking how nice it would be to have XDoclet for Tapestry. The most important piece is probably documenting and examples. Matt On Feb 7, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Newcomb, Michael P. wrote: I'm getting ready to commit updates to the Apache module that will enable support for generating

[Xdoclet-devel] tapestry support for XDoclet

2005-02-07 Thread Newcomb, Michael P.
Title: tapestry support for XDoclet I'm getting ready to commit updates to the Apache module that will enable support for generating Tapestry (http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry) component-specifications and page-specifications. It is currently under xdoclet.modules.apache.tapestry package an

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] [Fwd: XDoclet 1.3]

2005-02-07 Thread Magnus Larsson
Hello! I agree with Andrew! Parsing J2SE 5.0 syntax and supporting J2EE 1.4 seems to be good targets for XDoclet v1.3. Regards, Magnus. On Monday 07 February 2005 20:44, Andrew Stevens wrote: > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 17:33, Matthias Germann wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Is there already a release

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] [Fwd: XDoclet 1.3]

2005-02-07 Thread Andrew Stevens
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 17:33, Matthias Germann wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there already a release date planned for XDoclet 1.3? "When it's ready". Actually, unless we have complete J2EE 1.4 (i.e. EJB 2.1 & Servlet 2.4) support and/or JDK 1.5 syntax parsing, I'd be inclined just to call it 1.2.3 rath

[Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Updated: (XDT-1265) access tag not supported in 2.1

2005-02-07 Thread noreply
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Chris Longfield (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:46 PM Comment: This patch provides the ability to arbitrarily assign an access modifier class, but gets rid of the 'type checking' functionality of the previous defini

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] [Fwd: XDoclet 1.3]

2005-02-07 Thread Rupp, Heiko
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] [Fwd: XDoclet 1.3] Hi, not that I am aware of. My intention when setting the next version 1.3 was that this will be the JDK 1.5/5.0 supporting release. This means fixing XJD-41 and resulting fallout in the XDoclet side.     Heiko Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag v

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: jboss-bean-body.xdt

2005-02-07 Thread Matthias Germann
I can't find any reference to it in the whole xdoclet project. IMHO, it should be removed if it is legacy code. Michael Kopp wrote: I think it is legacy code, as I agree it is not used anymore. It should be removed. I made some fixes myself to this file before noticing that they do not have effect.

[Xdoclet-devel] [Fwd: XDoclet 1.3]

2005-02-07 Thread Matthias Germann
Hi all, Is there already a release date planned for XDoclet 1.3? Regards, Matthias Original Message Subject:XDoclet 1.3 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:44:59 +0300 From: Kasatkin Konstantin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello Matthias, Could you inform me w

[Xdoclet-devel] Wrong DOCTYPE

2005-02-07 Thread Miriam Senovilla
Hi!!!   I'm trying to generate an EJB by Xdoclet, but it's generated with a wrong doctype.     My bean is like that:   package entity.ejb; import java.rmi.RemoteException; import javax.ejb.CreateException; import javax.ejb.EntityBean; import javax.ejb.EntityContext; import javax.naming.Na

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] First reference to merge directory

2005-02-07 Thread Rupp, Heiko
The merge directory is where you tell ejbdoclet to be it :-)   Create a new directory in the project and build the same directories in it as in the source path where the corresponding java file can be found   E.g.:     src/     de/   foo/     MyEJB.java  <-- needs merge file   ba

[Xdoclet-devel] First reference to merge directory

2005-02-07 Thread Miriam Senovilla
Hi!   I need to create an "entity-beans" xml on merge directory, "to add entity beans that I have deployment descriptor info for". Maybe it's obvious, but, where is merge directory or where i've to create it?? Have i configure Eclipse to do it??   Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]Miriam Senovilla Ma

[Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Assigned: (XDT-1267) Typo mistake in \docs\valueobjects.html

2005-02-07 Thread noreply
Message: The following issue has been re-assigned. Assignee: Andrew Stevens (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) - View the issue: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/browse/XDT-1267 Here is an overview of the issue:

[Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Commented: (XDT-1260) Inconsistency between DD and HomeInterface

2005-02-07 Thread noreply
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Michael Kopp Created: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:40 AM Body: Well kind of. My problem is not that the COMP_NAME does not have the Local suffix, but that the generated code and the generated DD are not consistent. The COMP_NAME i

[Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Commented: (XJD-56) Typo mistake in \docs\valueobjects.html

2005-02-07 Thread noreply
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Andrew Stevens Created: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 6:57 PM Body: Wrong project (there's no docs/valueobject.html in xjavadoc, that's in xdoclet). Also, it would have been helpful if you'd said what the typo was - I assume it's the