> C++ terminology. :-) A constructor that has an argument of the same type
> as itself with the job to create a "copy" of that object.
(o: ahhh, thankyou
I'm obviously showing my lack of c++ programming knowledge...
shouldn't be too hard at all to do, will have a look tonight.
cheers
d
> > Oh, yes. Of course. That seems very reasonable, but it would require the
> > base class to define a copy constructor. Is that a too hard requirement?
>
>not sure what you mean by a copy constructor, you mean taking defensive
>copies? I wouldn't see that we'd need to go that far...
C++ term
> >As I understand it, what Lanh is asking for is this:
> >
> > public AdministratorData( AdministratorData otherData )
> > {
> > super(otherData);
> > ...
> > }
> >
> >yes?
> >
> >I can see the argument for that? anyone else, thoughts?
>
> Oh, yes. Of course. That se
At 16:03 2002-04-19 +1000, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
>As I understand it, what Lanh is asking for is this:
>
> public AdministratorData( AdministratorData otherData )
> {
> super(otherData);
> ...
> }
>
>yes?
>
>I can see the argument for that? anyone else, thoughts?
Oh
As I understand it, what Lanh is asking for is this:
public AdministratorData( AdministratorData otherData )
{
super(otherData);
...
}
yes?
I can see the argument for that? anyone else, thoughts?
cheers
dim
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Bratell" <[EM
At 11:18 2002-04-19 +0700, Lanh TRAN VAN wrote:
>public class AdministratorData
>extends sdc.smart.user.UserData
>implements java.io.Serializable
>{
>static final long serialVersionUID = 821305460747458512L;
>public AdministratorData()
>{
>}
>public AdministratorData( A
Hi,
This is the code generated by Xdoclet for a Data class of an entity bean:
public class AdministratorData
extends sdc.smart.user.UserData
implements java.io.Serializable
{
static final long serialVersionUID = 821305460747458512L;
public AdministratorData()
{
}
public Adm
"What I am trying to do is allow lazy-loading of related objects from data
object. So it contains some finder-related methods, which go and fetch the
data."
I like this idea: lazy loading Aggregated/Composed ValueObjects from
ValueObject. Maybe have the ValueObject use the aggregated/composed be
A wise old hermit known only as Michael Elizarov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> Remote
...
> lot of fun... Bug?
Sounds like bug #517372 "Wrong transact. method-intf for local be" to me.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=517372&group_id=3
1602&atid=402704
You
I write bean classes, which have a hierarchy. All classes in hierarchy
are abstract, and not used for actual CMP bean generation, except for
leaf nodes. I also use XDoclet to create data object. Quite naturally,
data objects follow hierarchy parallel to one of the beans. XDoclet puts
all attri
It sounds like a bug. Please file it as a bug report and enclose the
associated javadoc section of your bean. you can assign it to me (rinkrank)
Thanks in advance,
/Aslak
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael
> Elizarov
> Sent: 1
I have a bunch of entity beans with only local interface, which are
facaded by session bean(s) with remote. If I put transaction type tag on
locally accessible bean methods, then XDoclet generates something like
this in ejb-jar.xml:
UnitOfMeasure
Remote
Peter, please note that the DTD for jbosscmp-jdbc.xml has changed. The
example you provided here is invalid according to the new DTD. Take a look
at this post
http://main.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=46&thread=12702
in JBoss forums. Here I explained how to write relationships in the new DTD
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Shunsuke Masuda
> Sent: 18. april 2002 16:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-user] WebSphere 4 PK class and etc.
>
>
> Hello,
>
> WebSphere 4 complains of PK classes which have non-public
Hello,
WebSphere 4 complains of PK classes which have non-public
fields at deployment time.
To stop this, I think I need to write another entitypk.j and specify it
in ant's build files. Are there any other way?
And I'd like to know about XDoclet's websphere support development.
Is it taken place
Perhaps I was going down the wrong road here... :-)
I want to have a jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file that implements a relationship without any
foreign-key constraints. I want it to use a table to map the relationships. I want the
following:
http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd";>
Marcus explained it yesterday. I try again.
Order is composed of Lines
Order aggregate Customer
When you create/remove an Order you do NOT create/remove a Customer
When you create/remove an Order you do create/remove Lines
If the code does not shows you that let me know exactly where.
Vincent
Hello,
Vincent writes:
>For these look at generated code. The idea is "responsability" of an
>entity bean over its related relationship
>For Composition Customer knows he is the master of Address,
>In all these, aggregate/compose is the Java type of the
>aggregate/compose VO (you could read
It is
It reuse the Data object from it's CMP version
You have
private test.interfaces.CustomerData dataHolder;
public test.interfaces.CustomerData getData(){}
etc...
in CustomerBMPBMP
> In the sample CustomerBMPBean the @ejb.data-object tag is used with
> parameters i cant find describe
In the sample CustomerBMPBean the @ejb.data-object tag is used with parameters i cant
find described in the documentation:
@ejb.data-object generate="false" class="test.interfaces.CustomerData"
Is this correct?
/Jon
___
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMA
> Come to xdoclet devel to help.
> This is unacceptable that weblogic cmp works and not jboss.
>
WebLogic rocks, JBoss sucks! (That should wake them up, Vincent ;-> ).
Aslak
> Thanks.
>
> Vincent
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
_
Andy,
David has tagged xdoclet cvs with a Jboss specific tag sometimes ago.
The version today is very very more confident for CMP.
Come and tag whenever you want :) Don't forget (amazing) xjavadoc.
I take the opportunity to launch a call for help (crossed post to
xdoclet lists)
There are still s
22 matches
Mail list logo
