-Original Message-
> >>>> From: Xen-devel On Behalf Of
> >>>> Roger Pau Monné
> >>>> Sent: 22 January 2020 14:53
> >>>> To: Durrant, Paul
> >>>> Cc: Anthony PERARD ; xen-
> >>>> de...@lists.xenproject.or
Monné
>>>> Sent: 22 January 2020 14:53
>>>> To: Durrant, Paul
>>>> Cc: Anthony PERARD ; xen-
>>>> de...@lists.xenproject.org; Ian Jackson ;
>> Wei
>>>> Liu
>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add definition of
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Pau Monné
> Sent: 31 January 2020 11:06
> To: Durrant, Paul
> Cc: Anthony PERARD ; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org; Ian Jackson ; Wei
> Liu
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add definition of
> INVALID_DOMID
.xenproject.org; Ian Jackson ; Wei
> > Liu
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add definition of
> > INVALID_DOMID to the API
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 02:44:40PM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > Currently both xl and libxl have
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel On Behalf Of
> Roger Pau Monné
> Sent: 22 January 2020 14:53
> To: Durrant, Paul
> Cc: Anthony PERARD ; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org; Ian Jackson ; Wei
> Liu
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add de
> > Hi. (I'm replying to the 1/ here because I don't seem to have any 0/
> > in my inbox...)
>
> Oh, I must have forgot to copy the combined cc list onto the cover letter.
> Sorry about that.
There's a bug in git-send-email in this area.
> Don't worry, your feedback is fine... certainly not
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel On Behalf Of Ian
> Jackson
> Sent: 30 January 2020 17:32
> To: Durrant, Paul
> Cc: Anthony Perard ; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org; Wei Liu
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add definition of
> INVALID
Paul Durrant writes ("[PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add definition of INVALID_DOMID to
the API"):
> Currently both xl and libxl have internal definitions of INVALID_DOMID
> which happen to be identical. However, for the purposes of describing the
> behaviour of libxl_domain_create_new/restore() it is
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 02:44:40PM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Currently both xl and libxl have internal definitions of INVALID_DOMID
> which happen to be identical. However, for the purposes of describing the
> behaviour of libxl_domain_create_new/restore() it is useful to have a
> specified
Currently both xl and libxl have internal definitions of INVALID_DOMID
which happen to be identical. However, for the purposes of describing the
behaviour of libxl_domain_create_new/restore() it is useful to have a
specified invalid value for a domain id.
This patch therefore moves the libxl
10 matches
Mail list logo
