Obviously I misunderstood the way it installs itself. Anyway after the
proper installation (no xeno-flags for busybox and dest_dir as
$myfilesystem_root/) neither latency or xeno-test was working.
*/usr/xenomai/bin/xeno-test-run: error while loading shared libraries:
libpthread.so.0: cannot open
You are compiling with -march=armv7-a and linking with
-march=armv4t, are you sure this is supposed to work?
I guess compiling for armv7 and linking for armv4 is not supported...
Anyway, to understand what happens, you can do what is written,
look at config.log.
Yes that was the problem.
I will continue this topic since my problem looks similar.
I'm using linux kernel from *http://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-gch.git/* (ipipe
core-3.2 ) and xenomai 2.6 branch head. Compiling for versatile express
cortex-a9.
I tried to cross-compile a simple program bound_task (can be found in
On 07/03/2012 06:01 PM, Marcin Kuśka wrote:
I will continue this topic since my problem looks similar.
I'm using linux kernel from *http://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-gch.git/* (ipipe
core-3.2 ) and xenomai 2.6 branch head. Compiling for versatile express
cortex-a9.
I tried to cross-compile a
On 06/06/2012 11:18 AM, ali hagigat wrote:
Much appreciate for the reply, Mr. Gerum. Here is the result of ldd command:
http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai-help/2011-12/msg00012.html
/usr/xenomai/bin ldd switchtest
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb786c000)
libpthread_rt.so.1 =
On 06/06/2012 12:47 PM, ali hagigat wrote:
I still have the problem:
This is obviously not the same problem.
/root/build/xenomai/xenomai-2.6.0 ./configure --enable-smp
CFLAGS=-fno-omit-frame-pointers
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type...
On 06/06/2012 03:18 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/06/2012 02:28 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:48 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 06/06/2012 11:18 AM, ali hagigat wrote:
Much appreciate for the reply, Mr. Gerum. Here is the result of ldd
command:
On 06/06/2012 04:27 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/06/2012 04:02 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/06/2012 03:55 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/06/2012 03:53 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 06/06/2012 03:41 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/06/2012 03:25 PM, Philippe Gerum
On 06/06/2012 04:27 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/06/2012 04:02 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/06/2012 03:55 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/06/2012 03:53 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 06/06/2012 03:41 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/06/2012 03:25 PM, Philippe Gerum
