Thanks Doug.
What If I am using ONLY the SAX Interface ?
There is a way to get it using ONLY the Interface provided by SAX (basically
the question is there is a callback associated to a DOCTYPE declaration)?
Thanks again
Alfredo
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
The key to being able to successfully call Initialize() on the Xerces
library is that all of the static data associated with the library must be
zeroed. This will always be true when a conventional OS first loads a
library. It is not true after terminate(), which is what prevents
Initialize from
Kevin -
I use Xerces-C on VxWorks and it seems the obvious solution is to do what I
do... never call Terminate(). If indeed you think you may want to later
(before a reboot) use Xerces, then don't call Terminate(). It's not all
that difficult to make sure that Initialize() is only invoked one t
We recently had a client that uses our product complain that their server
wasn't coming up. Upon further examination it was determined that in
Win32TransService::Win32TransService() if this constructor can't find an
"InternetEncoding" for any codepage that it finds in the registry it just
panics.
Hello all,
I was able to further my quest in obtaining an implementation of Xerces-C for VxWorks
(thanks to Johannes at CERN) I have downloaded CERN's port and things seem to be
functioning fairly well. Thanks again Johannes.
Interestingly enough, as many programers new to Xerces have found o
Replace the element with another having the desired name. Sorry, but the
DOM node's name is _deliberately_ not a mutable value, for many reasons
having to do with everything from document integrety to object-system
integrety.
-
Hello all,
I need to change
into
Any ideas on what the easiest way to do this is? I see
there is no setNodeName().
thanks,
-Pete
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
Hello Alfredo:
Here's how you can get the name of the DTD, that is, the name immediately
following the DOCTYPE keyword in an XML source document:
DOMString GetDoctypeName( const DOM_Document& doc )
{
DOM_DocumentType doctype = doc.getDoctype();
if( doctype.isNull() )
> "Peter A. Volchek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But, why not provide the (let name it advanced api ) additional feature,
> > which allows to suppress it? (especially, when so many people require
it).
> > At least, it may be put in the protected area of a parser, so that it
might
> > be us
"Peter A. Volchek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But, why not provide the (let name it advanced api ) additional feature,
> which allows to suppress it? (especially, when so many people require it).
> At least, it may be put in the protected area of a parser, so that it might
> be used, only by t
Same way I can say that not everything clear with Xerces.
When validating parser meets attribute, which is not declared in DTD,
it has to report error. And Xerces does report. But if attribute starts
from 'xmlns:' Xerces does not report error. So, if we agree that namespaces
and DTDs are not reall
Dean Roddey wrote:
>
> As a practical matter, DTDs are not just about validation. They cause a lot
> other stuff to happen. In most cases, people who are not validating still
> very much want it to be processed and want to know if anything goes wrong.
> So don't get too tied up on DTDs being just
> DTDs can indeed "cause a lot of other stuff to happen" but
> non-validating parsers can only be relied upon to make that
> stuff happen using the internal subset. Defaulting attributes,
> expanding entities, etc. are all vital things but if you are
> using a non-validating parser, your definiti
> Thanks Dean and Joseph for the answers.
> That exactly what I suspected, but would like
> to get third party's opinion.
> I don't think that this is bug in MS Parser (successful
> validation of element with namespace prefix if it declared in DTD
> without namespace prefix). Rather it's feature.
The parser should conform to xml rec. No one argues with this statement.
In its "default" state it raises fatal error if dtd is missing. That is
great.
But, why not provide the (let name it advanced api ) additional feature,
which allows to suppress it? (especially, when so many people require it)
How I get the DOCTYPE and the name of the external DTD in use?
In the example below:
..
I need to pass to my application both , the name after !DOCTYPE and the DTD
referenced after SYSTEM.
Many thanks in advance
Alfredo
---
Tinny Ng wrote:
>
> Or see http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/schema.html
>
> Tinny
>
How about putting an appropriate question and link to this in the FAQ?
Thanks (and thanks to you and everyone else who has worked on xerces-c
for a fine product).
Joanne
-
Or see http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/schema.html
Tinny
Jesse Pelton wrote:
It's under development right now. For details, see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=98682228707572&w=2
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
It seems that this discussion is one best addressed by the XML spec
community and not here. The real question is should a non-validating
parse raise a fatal error if it cannot locate the DTD specified in the
DOCTYPE? Currently, this seems to be an implementation issue. Xerces
does it one way and o
Sorry about this. I went thru FAQ before sending this email. I wanted to
know whether any body has added any extensions to Xerces and also whether
there is any better way to stringify DOM_Node (when compared to DOMPrint
example). I clicked on send button accidentally before writing the message
It's under development right now. For details, see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=98682228707572&w=2
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably they do 'nonstandard validation'. But you don't
need turn on it explicitly. IE can recognize it. This is example:
1.
content text
Validation correct. Namespace is declared
2.
content text
Validation failed. Namespace is not declared
>
> Sorry, but it ex
Hi,
I've recently downloaded the xerces for C (v1.4) XML parser. It doesnt seem
to understand schema and in particular the W3C XML schema. I noticed that
the Java version explictly mentions support for schema (presumably the W3C
one as well), anyone know when the C version will adopt this support
>I don't think that this is bug in MS Parser (successful
>validation of element with namespace prefix if it declared in DTD
>without namespace prefix). Rather it's feature.
Sorry, but it explicitly violates the XML spec's definition of validity, so
if they're claiming to be a validating XML pars
DTDs can indeed "cause a lot of other stuff to happen" but
non-validating parsers can only be relied upon to make that
stuff happen using the internal subset. Defaulting attributes,
expanding entities, etc. are all vital things but if you are
using a non-validating parser, your definitions HAVE t
Thanks Dean and Joseph for the answers.
That exactly what I suspected, but would like
to get third party's opinion.
I don't think that this is bug in MS Parser (successful
validation of element with namespace prefix if it declared in DTD
without namespace prefix). Rather it's feature.
MS likes cre
>It would be *very* useful to have some kind of 'parser' that, rather than
a
>stream, takes a DOM_Document and checks that against the DTD, updating the
>document's ID map and what have you.
Earlier versions of Xerces had a nonstandard "revalidating parser" API
which let you do this. I don't thi
>I've got question about relationship between namespaces and Valid XML.
>...
>I didn't find clear explanations at w3c how this suppose to work
Mostly because the W3C made no real effort to design namespaces so they
"play well" with DTD validation. An assumption was made that if you wanted
to val
There's another archive at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&r=1&w=2.
-Original Message-
From: John L. Fjellstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gcc + Solaris
At 06:31 PM 4/26/2001 -0400,
I totally agree with this point.
I'm not into RECs all that much but surely the parse should be allowed to
occur?
I know I mentioned it before but the following illustrates how I got the
parser to do the parse anyway:
Original xml doc:
.
.
.
Frig (start parsing from)
.
.
.
**The point i
If I know exactly, that referred DTD does not contain niether any entities
not default attribute declarations (end even if it does, but it is not
important for processing xml for my suits), and I want just parse xml, not
to validate it, I should have an ability to suppress the exception to be
thro
Hi all,
When modifying or creating a DOM_Document in memory, there seems to be only
one way to check that the results are valid in terms of the DTD. Also,
a lot of information is generated during the parse of a stream that cannot
be updated through the DOM (e.g. DOM_Document::getElementById() onl
There is no serialization in xerces-c, so everybody ends up modifying the
DOMPrint example.
Me, too, and you can have it.
No warranties, mileage may vary and so on.
Good luck, e
DOMSerializer.cpp
DOMSerializer.hpp
-
To unsubs
33 matches
Mail list logo
