- Original Message -
From: "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vote
> > I said that I would
> > gladly welcome a major change to directory/make-structure if it was
just
> > that - a maj
Martin Kalen wrote:
>
> (The following is a personal response and may or may not be in line with my
> company's official opinions.)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Changing include to include/xer
(The following is a personal response and may or may not be in line with my
company's official opinions.)
- Original Message -
From: "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vote
> You should
Title: RE: Encoding problems
Thanks.
Siehnai Williamson
DocuCorp International, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encoding problems
No wonder the parser
Title: Encoding problems
Here's the file I'm testing with.
<>
-Original Message-
From: Williamson, Siehnai [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 3:14 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Encoding problems
Hi,
I'm trying to parse (SAX parser)
Team Xerces-C,
Is there a top-level schema dependency that I can remove from 1.5.1 so that
make will no longer build-in schema support? I have no requirement for
schema and would like to tailor it out of my memory constrained embedded
application (plus my antique GNU 2.7.2 compiler is getting an
Hi!
thanks for responding.
Yes I've tried that. And I get the following horrible link errors:
Thanks for any more clues
-Julie
Configuration: NeuroServerNSE - Win32 Release
MinDependency
The NeuroServer Multi-vRep Controller service is not started.
More
Title: Encoding problems
Hi,
I'm trying to parse (SAX parser) a document utilizing the UTF-16 encoding, but I keep getting an error.
It appears that the line in XMLReader::XMLReader()
fEncoding = XMLRecognizer::basicEncodingProbe(...)
always returns fEncoding = UTF-8, eventho
Julia,
You may build the XercesClib using "MultiThreaded" instead
of "MultiThreaded DLL".
.downlaod the source package
.in MSVC, project->setting->clikc on XercesLib ->C/C++->
Category->Code Generation,
from Use run-time libra
What does it mean to get this error:
Here is the XML
"\r\n\r\n\tMessage
here\r\n"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
We have a huge product that uses all static libraries built
with the "Multithreaded" run-time library option. Xerces
uses the "Multithreaded DLL" which produces horrible link
errors when I try to link with the library in release mode.
What can I do about this?
Please help
Thanks
-Juli
Hi All,
I want to know, If there is any way to validate the DTD using xerces
C++ API.
Also is there any way to catch the events thrown by DTD while parsing.
Thanks,
Raj
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: ["Tinny Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Changing include to include/xercesc -
>Summary and Vote
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 01:55:34 -0700
> From: "Randolph Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jason E. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Title: UTF-16, UCS-4 encodings
My document header does specify the "UTF-16" encoding, and it still throws an error. Does the document have to look a certain way for it to work?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brower [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:57 PM
Hi,
No, I don't follow the xerces list. Thanks for the heads up.
The header include directory certainly has been an issue. I've even had
some bugs filed against it
FWIW I think the proposed solution is definitely better than what we have
now.
It'd be also great if upstream would make thei
Dear Tinny
Thousand thanks. I will try it out :D...
You have helped me much than I expected... Wish you all the best
Best regards,
Jordan Cheun Ngen, Chong
Room 4067
Distributed and Embeded Systems Group
Centre for Telematics and Information Technolo
XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize()/Terminate(); should be OUTSIDE the body of
"function". The XMLPlatformUtils::Initalize()/Terminate(); can only be called
once within the entire application.
Tinny
Jordan C N Chong wrote:
> Dear Tinny
>
> Thanks again for your valuable time and help...
>
> This is
Dear Tinny
Thanks again for your valuable time and help...
This is the code:
// path: the path and the file name
void function(char *path)
{
// Parse the license with XML4C
XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize();
DOMParser parser;
parser.parse(path);
doc = pars
Elliott Perkins wrote:
> [snipped] The question
> is "how do you use DOMParser to parse multiple XMLs within the same
> session"? Other than the call to XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize(), are
> there other initialization calls that are required in order to setup the
> DOMParser?
You cannot call
Hi,
Thanks for your help.
I don't understand. I am writing an application (windows application)
that open an XML document and parse it.
The first time I open an XML document and parse it, there is no problem.
I close the XML document, and then reopen it and then parse it again,
then the problem
Is the code you appended being called multiple times within the same process? You
cannot call
XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize(); again after XMLPlatformUtils::Terminate(); within the
same
process. See http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/faq-parse.html#faq-25 for further detail.
Tinny
Jordan C N Cho
Please try the latest distribution Xerces C++ 1.5.1 which may have fixed
your problem.
Tinny
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
general answer to your question is, "Yes." For details, though,
read the license agreement that comes with the Xerces distribution
carefully.
-Original Message-From: wayne
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001
11:13 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: About
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3170
Thank you Derek!
I didn't know before that you can manipulate how the linker places functions
in the exe or dll.
Our application will definately benifit from this.
Now I just have to convince my boss :)
Best regards
Erik Rydgren
-Original Message-
From: Derek Harmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
"Shlomi Afia" wrote:
> I got about 500 page faults per second(!) on this simple example code.
> Although it looks like "soft" page faults (there is no disk activity
> involved), it's still too high.
You can try optimizing the Working Set of the DLL
to your client application's behavior, to reduce
Thank you very much Erik. If this is how DOM uses memory, I guess I don't
have a choice but to use SAX.
Regards,
Shlomi
-Original Message-
From: Erik Rydgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon, August 20, 2001 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HELP! Page faults, when running
Just for a thought...
How many parses do you get in a second then? And how many page faults is
there for each parse?
How much memory is 500 page faults?
You get a page fault for each page the program allocates (cache heatup). And
5000 bytes is at least 2 pages (depending on processor) without an
> Does any one have any experience building Xerces C++ library on Windows NT
> with CodeWarrior compiler ?
I did it last year. I have a project and the platform specific files that work
OK with it.
The main problem is that the Win32Transcoder provided by Xerces, at least at the
time I did it,
Martin Kalen wrote:
>
> Martin Kalen:NO/-1
>
> We use Xerces-C on Windows NT4/2000, HP-UX, Linux, Solaris, AIX,
> OpenServer, UnixWare and Tru64 so I am neither pro-UNIX or pro-Windows.
>
> We have numerous hours invested in integrating the Xerces-C directory- and
> make-structure into our
"Arnold, Curt" wrote:
>
> Sorry, some more *nix novice questions.
>
> If trying to get Xerces in the distributions is primarily to allow already compiled
>code to run without having to provide the .so's, would an binary/runtime drop that
>did not have header files resolve
> the collision issue
Well, I'm using the NT's Performance Monitor, and I'm examining the "Page
Faults/sec" counter on the "Process" object. You can easily see the problem
on the Task Manager too, if you select the "Page Faults" and "Page Faults
Delta" Columns.
I got about 500 page faults per second(!) on this simple
hi all,
I tried to use the DOMParse to parse the same XML document in the same
session, but always ends up memory leak problem... and the whole application
just crashed. I found that the problem happens at the "DOMParser parser;".
The following codes is the snipplet of my codes... Please help. I
33 matches
Mail list logo