On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 19:21, Tinny Ng wrote:
> Murray,
>
> I think we can do the first two, good suggestions.
I don't see any change on the website. And I don't seen any information
about where the website source is stored, so I can't create a patch to
make this ha
Reposting in the hope of a response:
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 18:20, Murray Cumming wrote:
> I'd like to suggest some things to help you/us manage the bugzilla bug
> reports:
>
> 1.
> Make it easy for people to see the outstanding bugs by putting a link on
>
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 17:17, Brad Settlemyer wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Murray Cumming [mailto:murrayc@;t-online.de]
> > Major "API versions" absolutely should be in the library name. How else
> > will an application benefit from bugfixes in
d be:
> namespace XERCES_PRODUCT = XERCES_CPP_NAMESPACE;
>
> where XERCES_PRODUCT was defined in XercesVersion.hpp.
1. I hope you can do this without using a macro.
2. namespaces don't tend to be uppercase. For instance, std, boost.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.m
> software, and I can't figure out what the extra value is.
The proposal did seem to say that a non-versioned namespace name could
be used to refer to the latest version, so I don't think this would be
visible to you unless you want to
t so far, so I don't see the need
to complicate things by fixing a bug/request that does not yet exist.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
here,
and people can't ignore it, instead of flooding the list with mostly
irrelevant notifications. We do this successfully on the gtkmm mailing
list:
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying Xerces-C++ 2.1 from source. "make install" does install the
headers but doesn't seem to install the library. I'm expecting something
starting with libxerces in my /lib directory.
Am I missing something really obvious?
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL P
etween minor releases ?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
>
> Guillaume,
>
> Yes, the soname is 'libxerces-c.so.17'. If next version/release gona to
> change the ABI, we will **DEFINITELY** change the soname as well.
This i
en't any OS/390 users, so we don't
care.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D/IconvFreeBSDTransService.cpp
> >
> > from # include
> >
> > to # include
>
> It seems to be caused by the sane-includes (hope Tiny will apply the patch
> you've supplied) ...
You probably need to put the patch in bugzilla t
On Wed, 2002-02-20 at 01:31, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Can you at least tell us what IDOM is? How is it different/better
> > than the old DOM stuff?
>
> Andy Henninger put up a very useful WWW site to di
On Wed, 2002-02-20 at 01:31, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Can you at least tell us what IDOM is? How is it different/better
> > than the old DOM stuff?
>
> Andy Henninger put up a very useful WWW site to di
id setEndBefore(const IDOM_Node* refNode) = 0;
> virtual void setEndAfter(const IDOM_Node* refNode) = 0;
> virtual void collapse(bool toStart) = 0;
> virtual void selectNode(const IDOM_Node* node) = 0;
> virtual void selectNodeContents(const IDOM_Node* node) = 0;
> virtual shortcompareBoundaryPoints(CompareHow how,
> const IDOM_Range* range) const
>= 0;
> virtual void deleteContents() = 0;
> virtual IDOM_DocumentFragment* extractContents() = 0;
> virtual IDOM_DocumentFragment* cloneContents() const = 0;
> virtual void insertNode(IDOM_Node* node) = 0;
> virtual void surroundContents(IDOM_Node* node) = 0;
> virtual IDOM_Range* cloneRange() const = 0;
> virtual const XMLCh* toString() const = 0;
> virtual void detach() = 0;
>
> };
> IDOM_DocumentRange.hpp:
> // This interface can be obtained from the object implementing the
> // Document interface using binding-specific casting methods.
> class IDOM_DocumentRange
> {
> public:
> virtual IDOM_Range*createRange() = 0;
> };
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> /**
>James D. Berry
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>vox:503.265.1213 fax:503.222.3020
>**/
>
>
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ur points, and believe that the change of plan
should have been discussed on the list, I think that it's silly of you
to call this a trauma, or to say that you are suffering.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
iners and templates if that would be useful.
________
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
off-list email from Peiyong Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
about this. It seems like he's doing something about it but he hasn't
replied to my replies.
> Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 18:31, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 18:
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 18:31, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 18:06, Tinny Ng wrote:
> > I've reviewed Murray's patch for sane_include, it looks ok. But since the patch is
> > only for UNIX platforms, I think I need more time to integrate the changes to
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 18:31, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 18:06, Tinny Ng wrote:
> > I've reviewed Murray's patch for sane_include, it looks ok. But since the patch is
> > only for UNIX platforms, I think I need more time to integrate the changes to
n as well.
I agree. You need to apply the patch, direct people to the cvs or
appropriate nightly, and only release it when they say it's OK.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
Tinny, here's a sane_includes patch for the current cvs Xerces-C++, as
requested:
http://www.murrayc.com/temp/xercesc_sane_includes2.diff
I've tested it on my RedHat 7.1 Linux.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.m
(aka aclocal,
autoconf, automake, etc.)
>
> I plan to release Xerces 1.6 sometime early December, i.e. end of next week or
> so. It is appreciated if you can have a patch for your proposal some time
> this week. Please provide migration information as well. Thanks!
>
>
preciated if you can have a patch for your proposal some time
> this week. Please provide migration information as well. Thanks!
Remember that this will require a cvs change. We need to rename the src directory
to xercesc. Some cvs experts gave some advice about that at the time.
--
On Wed, 2001-10-17 at 22:51, D. Stimits wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> ...snip...
> > >
> > >
> > > What is required to get the ball rolling on this as a change? Should I
> > > submit an altered package that is similar to the sane_includes?
On Wed, 2001-10-17 at 19:49, D. Stimits wrote:
> "D. Stimits" wrote:
> >
> > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > >
> ...snip...
> > > > > I really have no idea what you're talking about. Could you try to
> > > > > explain more co
On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 01:26, D. Stimits wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2001-10-15 at 23:51, D. Stimits wrote:
> ...snip...
> > > >
> > > > Please comment on the sane_includes tarball.
> > >
> > > This tarball does wh
On Mon, 2001-10-15 at 23:51, D. Stimits wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2001-10-15 at 21:21, D. Stimits wrote:
> > > Michael Huedepohl wrote:
> > > >
> > > ...snip...
> > > > > > > > > > "Michael Huede
c/
>
> But instead to:
> ./xerces-c-src1_5_1/xercesc/include/
> ./xerces-c-src1_5_1/xercesc/src/
>
> This latter approach would completely avoid any source file changes,
> only a tarball creation would change. Windows and linux/UNIX people
> could then both use format of #include consistently,
> without special installation steps or conditionals.
Please see the archive for a big discussion, vote, and test tarball
about a similar issue:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=100013310415407&w=2
and some relevant background mails:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&w=2&r=2&s=xercesc&q=b
Please comment on the sane_includes tarball.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 18:49, D. Stimits wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> >Part 1.1Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
> >Encoding: 7bit
>
> Environment variables pass through to Makefile variables. Having
> environment variables set to som
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 16:29, Altenau, Maureen D CECOM RDEC C2D wrote:
> I am porting XML application software from a Windows platform to a Solaris
> platform. I am getting errors with the "namespace" declaration. Is this a
> compiler specific declaration or is it platform specific?
This is off
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 17:02, Michael Huedepohl wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 15:09, Michael Huedepohl wrote:
> > > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 01:01, D. Stimits wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 15:09, Michael Huedepohl wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 01:01, D. Stimits wrote:
> > > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 00:02, D. Stimits wrote:
> > > > >
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 02:59, D. Stimits wrote:> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 01:01, D. Stimits wrote:
> > > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 00:02, D. Stimits wrote:
> > > > > Murr
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 01:01, D. Stimits wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 00:02, D. Stimits wrote:
> > > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 19:02, D. Stimits wrote:
> > > > >
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 00:02, D. Stimits wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 19:02, D. Stimits wrote:
> > > Where would I post, or ask for changes to the official Xerces
> > > distribution?
> >
> > Erm, this list, of course.
&
frustrated
> by it, and can't or won't use it, then it does no good for anyone.
>
> D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r such things?
>
> D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't seen any feedback about the xercesc_sane_includes.tar.gz
tarball at
http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-c/experimental/
I intend to push for these changes to be made after the next release.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
mple and they are in parts of the files which are
unlikely to be touched by other work.
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> Tinny Ng wrote:
> >
> > According to your summary of count, if we count committers votes only,
> > then we
that. Thank you.
I just asked, because I thought that you were saying that I had to do
some more lobbying. Nevermind.
> Tinny
>
> Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > Tinny Ng wrote:
> >
> > > If there is any veto, and if you disagree
> > > with the veto, you
Tinny Ng wrote:
> If there is any veto, and if you disagree
> with the veto, you should lobby the person who cast the veto. Until
> all vetos are resolved, then we can move on from there.
>
> Tinny
Are there any vetos?
== Are there any -1s from committers?
--
Murray Cumming
lt: 1
Christopher Dam Brunn: 1
Jesse Pelton: +0
David Adams: -1 (said 0, but said 'No')
Murray Cumming: +1
Tinny Ng: 0
Totals:
-1: 5
0: 4
+1: 8
Simple Total: +3
The only list of committers that I have is here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=99805694327734&w=2
I
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
>
> "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > re-posting:
> >
> > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > >
> > > So what's the result of the vote?
> > >
>
> The result is as it
re-posting:
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> So what's the result of the vote?
>
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what's the result of the vote?
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECT
ot found. You will
just have an empty DOM_Document.
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Kalen wrote:
>
> (The following is a personal response and may or may not be in line with my
> company's official opinions.)
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:48 PM
...
>
> FWIW I think the proposed solution is definitely better than what we have
> now.
>
> It'd be also great if upstream would make their Makefiles a bit more...
> um Unix-friendly. If you look at the Debian package you will see
>
ith Xerces-C!
>
> --
> Martin Kalen
> Software Engineer
> TODAY Systems, Inc.
> http://www.todaysystems.com.au/
> Tel +61-3-9536 3900 - Fax +61-3-9536 3901
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
gt;
> P.s. Only committer votes are binding (and I'm not one), other votes are advisory,
>so you might mention your status when you vote.
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
mp; Reuters Company Web: www.factiva.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To
"J. J. Merelo" wrote:
>
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > "J. J. Merelo" wrote:
> > >
> > > -1
> > >
> > > > 1. It helps addressing the name collisions between header files from various
>libraries that, unfortunat
osal to change
> the includes. Am I backwards?
They are voting -1. Not +1. Unfortunately.
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ling list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 11503 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2001 14:43:52 -
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:43:40 +0200
> From: Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e
hortly afterwards, maybe.
> Paul
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
CTED]
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tinny Ng wrote:
>
> Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that if we rename src to xercesc then there will be
> > no need to have an include directory.
>
> No. In the binary distribution, we don't ship the source. Binary distribution only
>ships
to make sure that
somebody was at the wheel, because it's not always clear when I'm
talking to someone with responsibility, and because I believe that the
Xerces-C mailing list has become significantly less responsive over the
past year.
> Tinny
>
> Murray
e this impact each and every user. +1 agree, -1 against, 0
>no comment
>
> I will start 0. I don't think it worths the effort and worths to break users'
>environment/documentation, but well, if this is something that really helps the UNIX
>users and achieve sane build behavior, I
> am not against it ... so my vote is 0.
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
erates some operator
overloads in terms of others, but I can't remember the name. Anway, it's
almost certainly not available on all platforms.
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe,
lem, but not get
> the first child? How can I test if the FirstChild is available or not?
What version of Xerces-C? What platform? Surely getFirstChild() is used
somewhere in the examples. Have you called
XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize()?
--
Murray Cum
and then Build the
> Application.
It is always better to build it yourself rather than trust that your
setup is the same as some else's. Surely there are binary
incompatibilities between Solaris 7 and Solaris8.
--
Murray Cumming
www.mu
(CMLeaf*)nodeCur;
>
> New Code
>
> fLeafList[newIndex] = new
> CMLeaf(((CMLeaf*)nodeCur)->getElement(),
>
> ((CMLeaf*)nodeCur)->getPosition());
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick Chiang
>
> PS: If you plan to fix the problem in future release, woul
incredibly
responsive and problems were fixed immediately. Now I am not sure that
it is being actively maintained. I have to post simple emails several
times before they even get a response. I worry that other people are not
so persistent so good feedback and patches are therefore being ignored,
and that useful contributors may
Who is the maintainer of Xerces-C?
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
>
> "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Arnold, Curt" wrote:
> > >
> > > I haven't been following this thread and it troubles me that
> > > appears that it wo
oughts, feel free to comment on. In any case, I'll keep
> using xerces-c++, I guess..
>
> J
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the new includes
> be to set up files with the old names that just include the new ones...?
>
> (I don't have a position on the proposal.)
How many times do I have to say this?:
There will be no need to change existing code.
--
M
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> Tinny Ng wrote:
> > I just worry, if we do this, will we eventually be asked to add "xercesc" to all
> > the folders
> > => include/xercesc
> > => samples/xercesc
> > => bin/xercesc
> > => lib/xercesc
&
l'.
> --
> Arnaud Le Hors - IBM, XML Standards Strategy Group / W3C AC Rep.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;t sound like a good thing.
1. You will not have to do any more work than you already have to do for
each new Xerces release. I have made that clear.
2. It's stupid to say that all change is bad.
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
for us to implement such a change which potentially breaks all users? ...
As we have discussed, this will not impact users any more than any other
Xerces-C release, because we change the library name for every release.
I don't see how it's much different if they (foolishly) rely on
environmen
Still waiting.
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> Still waiting:
>
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > I'm still waiting on a maintainer's go-ahead on this. I'm not going to
> > do this work only to have it rejected later.
> >
> > M
Still waiting:
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> I'm still waiting on a maintainer's go-ahead on this. I'm not going to
> do this work only to have it rejected later.
>
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > "Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> > >
> &
I'm still waiting on a maintainer's go-ahead on this. I'm not going to
do this work only to have it rejected later.
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> "Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> >
> > "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> "Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> >
> > "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > As ususual, I'm reposting in the hope of an official reply:
> >
> > Hey Murray,
> >
> >
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
>
> "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As ususual, I'm reposting in the hope of an official reply:
>
> Hey Murray,
>
> Unfortunately, the archive doesn't provide a clear reason for doin
As ususual, I'm reposting in the hope of an official reply:
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> Now that Xerces-C 1.5.1 is safely out, I'd like to ask for permission to
> change the include directory to /include/xercesc. This is so that it
> matches 'make install', whic
Sparkes wrote:
> >
> > >Is it important to be compatible with autoconf 2.13 for now?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> No problem. I've actually found better ways to do what I need.
>
> Is anybody interested in using libtool? I probably will,
rgery.
Here is a link to the previous discussion:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=9944271312&w=2&r=1
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
>
> "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to use the DOMPrint code to ouput the text of a DOM_Document
> > that was constructed entirely in memory by adding nodes. Unlike the
> > DOMPrint
pe of stuff:
I've tried using DOM_Document::createXMLDecl(), and
DOM_Document::createDocumentType(), but they don't seem to have any
effect. Can anyone give me any clues?
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
> Dave Connet
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter A. Volchek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 5:31 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Renaming src to xercesc
> >
> >
> > > H
l the
> binary package will be under e.g.
> ./xerces-c1_5_0-AIX42/include/xercesc/dom/*.hpp
>
> And as a result all user application will be broken unless they either
> change their Makefile to add
>
>-I $(XERCESCROOT)/include/xercesc
>
> or modify all their
"Peter A. Volchek" wrote:
>
> > Here's my previous post again, for those who missed the reasoning:
> >
> > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to rename the 'src' directory to 'xercesc'. Here's
Here's my previous post again, for those who missed the reasoning:
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> I'd like to rename the 'src' directory to 'xercesc'. Here's why:
>
> I recently changed the build files so that they install the headers
> under a /inc
27;t do that
> > Have you thought about thousand customers/developers who will have to modify
> > their working projects, documentations and so on.
>
> Certainly an issue, but is it an over-riding one? Would the inclusion
> of a perl script to update project header files be a
Anybody who is uses the current 'make install' at the moment is probably
more than ready to accomodate the small changes necessary for this.
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> I'd like to rename the 'src' directory to 'xercesc'. Here's why:
>
> I recently changed the build files so that they install the headers
> under a /include/xercesc directory instead of polluting
> had a secondar
tional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ___
> Get a FREE email address for your WILD SIDE! Choose from over 350
> outrageous email addresses at http://www.WildEmail.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uild because the
headers are actually in src. SO, let's rename that directory. This
technique is used by lots of libraries, such as gtk.
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone please apply this patch:
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1147
PLEASE, could somebody apply this. Why must it always be so goddamn difficult
to get the simplest patches applied to Xerces-C?
The
Could someone please apply this patch:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1147
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
95 matches
Mail list logo
