Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
>
> As far as I am concerned I don't have a pb with moving all the headers
> into a specific subdirectory but I must say I really don't like the name
> "xercesc". Why do we need a 'c' here? You're not concerned that it might
> conflict with xercesj headers are you? ;-)
Surely it's not inconceivable that a java project might have some C
headers. JNI? OK, so it's unlikely, but it's a good idea to stick to
your own namespace just in case.
> I suggest, if you change, to simply use either xerces or Xerces (my
> preference).
I just used the principle that more information is better. I think that
we are now committed to the xercesc directory name because, since 1.5.1,
Xercec-C++ installs its headers in <prefix>/include/xercesc when doing a
'make install'.
> --
> Arnaud Le Hors - IBM, XML Standards Strategy Group / W3C AC Rep.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
