Greetings,
I needed a simple and inexpensive video card to get
my system up and running, and so I acquired the Sapphire
Radeon X300. Supposedly, this card, which is based on the
ATI Radeon RV370 chip, should function with XFree86 but the
server fails to load.
Here are the relevant lines from the
Are there any known issues with Radeon 9250 + Apple 23" Cinema Displays
using the DVI connector on the Radeon?
I've been trying to get the above combo working without success.
The configuration I'm using is that generated by X -configure and it
appears to be correct. However, the problem I'm exper
Hi,
I just got a Radeon 9800 pro on an enterprise linux box. It
recognizes the card with lspci, but it gives me an error of “no screen
found” . Has anyone else had this problem?
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19/12/2004 1412EST]:
> I have a problem similar to a few already posted, but there may be
> differences here, and I'm flummoxed, so it's worth a try!
^
Good word.
> Have installed 4.4.0 on top of RH v.9.
Stop r
try again with a different attachment...
Hi all...
I have a problem similar to a few already posted, but there may be differences
here, and I'm flummoxed, so it's worth a try!
Have installed 4.4.0 on top of RH v.9. Whenever I try to start X, I get the grey
screen with the X cursor but it goes no
Hi all...
I have a problem similar to a few already posted, but there may be differences
here, and I'm flummoxed, so it's worth a try!
Have installed 4.4.0 on top of RH v.9. Whenever I try to start X, I get the grey
screen with the X cursor but it goes no further than that. I have an ATI Radeon
92
vin
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Tel: +44 (0)118 971 5032
>
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: Carlos Figueiredo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 11 July 2004 17:49
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [XFree86] radeon IGP 345M DRI help
>
>Hi, i'm tryi
1 July 2004 17:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [XFree86] radeon IGP 345M DRI help
Hi, i'm trying to accelerate my Ati AGI 345M in Xfree86 whith the dri
snapshots and the radeon driver that's on de dir snapshots page, and i get
this error. A friend solve this problem with apt-get dist-
ueiredo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 July 2004 17:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [XFree86] radeon IGP 345M DRI help
Hi, i'm trying to accelerate my Ati AGI 345M in Xfree86 whith the dri
snapshots and the radeon driver that's on de dir snapshots page, and i get
this error. A friend so
Hi, i'm trying to accelerate my Ati AGI 345M in Xfree86 whith the dri
snapshots and the radeon driver that's on de dir snapshots page, and i get
this error. A friend solve this problem with apt-get dist-upgrade and got
dri working, i didn't! Can anyone help me with some how-to or something?
I have
essage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of S C Cheran
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [XFree86] RAdeon 9200, ibook and XFree86 (Please HELPPP)
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Dear all,
I tried to install Yellow Dog linux distributio on my iBook G4 that has a
Radeon Mobility 9200. unfortuantelly the X server it is not working. So I
decided to upgrade the Xfree86, but I do not know which vpackage to take.
I ran the command "sh Xinstall.sh -check" and it told me that i s
On Wed, 19 May 2004 12:24:54 +0100 (GMT Standard Time)
"mazshirvani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My installation of Linux does not have the most up-to-date Radeon driver
> (for the graphics card Radeon 9800Pro.) Is there an easy way of obtaining a
> copy of this particular driver by itself?! Tha
My installation of Linux does not have the most up-to-date Radeon driver (for the graphics card Radeon 9800Pro.) Is there an easy way of obtaining a copy of this particular driver by itself?! Thank you very much.
Cheers
Maz
Please, please, send me your configuration file...
Also, I have a ibook with ati readeon...
to use the driver without framebuffer at my laptop, I have a very ugly video,
with horizontal lines dancing..
And also, using my second out to TV, I only get 640x480...
How do I check if DRI is b
Gismo/Luca,
Thanks a million! I did never guess that the DRI drivers were that different!
I have a working, dual-head config now after compiling DRI from CVS over my
XFree 4.4 installation!
I just had to tweak the config you sent but that took only 30 minutes.
Thanks again!!!
Frits
> Hello,
Hmmm. As I said I compiled a XFree86 4.4 version from source... That's not
old.. I will look into the DRI version of the driver though since it seems to
have different parameters at least...
Frits
On Wednesday 14 April 2004 17:50, Alex Deucher wrote:
> your version of xfree86 is way too old. p
your version of xfree86 is way too old. please try with a newer
version. there were quite a few bugs in the pre-4.3 version. you may
need the "monitorlayout" option which wasn't added until after 4.3 was
released. Also, as was poined out, you can also use mergedfb for
dualhead.
Alex
-
1000 +hsync
+vsync
# Default mode "1152x864": 108.0 MHz, 67.5 kHz, 75.0 Hz
Modeline "1152x864" 108.00 1152 1216 1344 1600 864 865 868 900 +hsync +vsync
# Default mode "1152x768": 65.0 MHz, 44.2 kHz, 54.8 Hz
Modeline "1152x768" 65.00
Hello,
I have a portable (Sony GRX316MP) which contains a Radeon 7500 mobility which
has dual-head capability. I know this chip CAN handle non-cloning dual head
because the X server from Xig does it (and Windows of course). But the Xig
server has some problems and it seems to only support two h
I am trying to use a RADEON 7000 VE DDR (PCI) video card with RED HAT 7.3 and
XFree86 Version 4.1.0, Linux 2.4.7-0.13.1smp i686 and the X server locks up when I start
the GUI I need to know if my video card is compatible and are there any drivers available.
Thanks Mike
Hi *,
Couldn't find anything helpful in Google.
I used to run 4.3.0 with a Radeon 9200 card (pretendign I had the
ChipId 0x514d) and decent performance. glxgears said something about
1500 fps.
When I upgraded to 4.4.0 (same hardware, Linux kernel), I noticed that
the desktop feels sluggish and g
Phil Barnett wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 9:51 am, Alex Deucher wrote:
3D support for the IGP chipsets is available in DRI cvs. You can
either build from source or try the nightly binary snapshots available
here:
http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/Download
Cool, I'll try it out.
Wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 9:51 am, Alex Deucher wrote:
> 3D support for the IGP chipsets is available in DRI cvs. You can
> either build from source or try the nightly binary snapshots
available
> here:
> http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 9:51 am, Alex Deucher wrote:
> 3D support for the IGP chipsets is available in DRI cvs. You can
> either build from source or try the nightly binary snapshots available
> here:
> http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/
3D support for the IGP chipsets is available in DRI cvs. You can
either build from source or try the nightly binary snapshots available
here:
http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/Download
Alex
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there any Radeon Mobility U1 accelerated 3D support yet?
Any on the horizon?
- --
"The choices we make dictate the life we lead. To thine ownself be true." --
William Shakespeare
KI4DPT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
on 03/09/04 11:33, yvon hotmail wrote:
> I have a radeon9600xt card and a Adi microscan 17 inch screen (it is a
> screen from 6 years old i think but it is working excellent)
>
> Please i cant work with linux in textmodus so can you exacctly te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
on 03/09/04 12:06, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> You need to use XFree86 4.4.0 to support the 9600.
sorry, but this is *absolutely* not true:
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /var/log/XFree86.0.log
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not
You need to use XFree86 4.4.0 to support the 9600.
You can get it from www.xfree86.org
Alan.
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:33:48AM +0100, yvon hotmail wrote:
>
>
>
> I have linux mandrake 9.2 instalt on mij PC
> But it is only working in tekstmodus but not in grafischmodus.
>
> On the screen af
I have linux mandrake 9.2 instalt on mij
PC
But it is only working in tekstmodus but not in
grafischmodus.
On the screen after startx
(WW) radeon no matching device section for instance
(bus ID PCI:1:0:1) found
EE no devices found
Fatal server error no screens found
fatal 10 error 104
I have linux mandrake 9.2 instalt on mij
PC
But it is only working in tekstmodus but not in
grafischmodus.
On the screen after startx
(WW) radeon no matching device section for instance
(bus ID PCI:1:0:1) found
EE no devices found
Fatal server error no screens found
fatal 10 error 104
I
On Monday 08 March 2004 17:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here is the error log :
> (--) PCI:*(0:16:0) ATI Technologies Inc unknown chipset (0x5c63) rev 1, Mem
> (II) LoadModule: "radeon"
> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o
> (II) Module radeon: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
>
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
Here is the error log :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Yellow Dog Linux release: 4.3.0-2.1e)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.22-1asmp ppc [ELF]
Build Date: 29 August 2003
Build Host: skyfox.terraplex.com
Before rep
On Sunday 07 March 2004 16:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I try to install a Yellow Dog Linux
> on my Apple laptop iBook G4 800Mhz,
> and X doesn't work.
> My card is an ATI Radeon 9200.
>
> When I startx it answer me :
> (EE) No devices detected.
> Fatal server error:
> no screens found
> Is an
Hello,
I try to install a Yellow Dog Linux
on my Apple laptop iBook G4 800Mhz,
and X doesn't work.
My card is an ATI Radeon 9200.
When I startx it answer me :
(EE) No devices detected.
Fatal server error:
no screens found
!!!
Is anyone can help me ?
Thanks.
--
Nico BALLY
___
--- Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It sounds like what you may want is my radeon driver with mergedfb
> > support. It uses each crtc as a viewport into a single shared
> > framebuffer so the DRI works on both heads:
> > http://dri.s
Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It sounds like what you may want is my radeon driver with mergedfb
> support. It uses each crtc as a viewport into a single shared
> framebuffer so the DRI works on both heads:
> http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/MergedFB
Looks like it. Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
on 03/02/04 19:42, Dave Korb wrote:
> Has anyone tested the 4.4.0 release with the Radeon 9600 pro
> All-in-Wonder card. I had heard rumors that the All-in-Wonder cards had
> a different chipset than the regular 9600 series, but I cannot confi
Has anyone tested the 4.4.0 release with the Radeon
9600 pro All-in-Wonder card. I had heard rumors that the All-in-Wonder
cards had a different chipset than the regular 9600 series, but I cannot confirm
this. Does anyone know what the chipset is and are all 9600's the
same.
Thanks,
Dave
ent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:29 PM
Subject: [XFree86] Radeon 9200: DRI on one head and 2d on second head ?
> --
> >
> >Hello
> >
> >I'm trying to setup an ATI Redeon 9200 card for a multimedia PC.
> >
> >The goal is to
--
>
>Hello
>
>I'm trying to setup an ATI Redeon 9200 card for a multimedia PC.
>
>The goal is to be able to connect a video projector on the DVI head
>(screen 1) and the monitor on the main head (screen 0). And my kid
>would be rather disapointed if he can no longer
Hello
I'm trying to setup an ATI Redeon 9200 card for a multimedia PC.
The goal is to be able to connect a video projector on the DVI head
(screen 1) and the monitor on the main head (screen 0). And my kid
would be rather disapointed if he can no longer play with gltron on
the main screen, so I n
Alex Deucher wrote:
This is a known bug in the 3D driver. I first noticed it with
mergedfb. rendering is corrupted at with a desktop of 2048 pixels if
the full screen 3D context extends to the 2048th pixel. this is the
limit of the 3D engine. I'm not sure where the bug is offhand. I
didn't se
dan list wrote:
>
> Hi, I have a radeon 8500 card with 64MB of RAM, and my desktop
> resolution set to 2048x1536 I'm running the debian 4.3.0 radeon
xserver.
>
> I can run 3d programs at lower resolutions or in smaller windows just
> fine, but at full screen I get mostly black pixels, with a fe
Hi, I have a radeon 8500 card with 64MB of RAM, and my desktop
resolution set to 2048x1536 I'm running the debian 4.3.0 radeon xserver.
I can run 3d programs at lower resolutions or in smaller windows just
fine, but at full screen I get mostly black pixels, with a few
stationary pixels that are
> Good afternoon...
>
> My PC has a Radeon 9200 graphics card model GV-R92128VH.
>
> The PC is a dual boot Linux/Windows.
>
> Under Windows 2000, the 3D graphics acceleration works. However, under
> Linux, I have no 3D graphics acceleration. This is evidenced by TUXRACER
> not working correctly.
>
Good afternoon...
My PC has a Radeon 9200 graphics card model GV-R92128VH.
The PC is a dual boot Linux/Windows.
Under Windows 2000, the 3D graphics acceleration works. However, under Linux, I have
no 3D graphics acceleration. This is evidenced by TUXRACER not working correctly.
Linux system da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>I checked out XFree86 from cvs last night and compiled it, and it
>still
>doesn't work with my Radeon 9200.
>
>But in the radeon(4) manual page, it says:
>
>Radeon 9200PRO/92000/9200SE, M9+
>
>So unless my radeon 9200 is not one of these, then why doe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>Radeon 9200 is not supported by the _release_ version of the radeon
>driver, but it is supported by the _current_ version. I've read
>this in
>some posting of this list (I think in the archives).
I checked out XFree86 from cvs last night and compiled
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:52:27PM +0100, LeVA wrote:
> 2004. január 22. 10:40 dátummal Ale? Vojá?ek ezt írta:
> (god bless him) from the debian-user list sent me his order and poof,
> it worked. I have a card with 9200 chipset, which is a problematic
> type, cause I can not use xfree's driver wi
2004. január 22. 10:40 dátummal Aleą Vojáček ezt írta:
> Hi,
> I have a problem with Asus 9600XT. This card have ATI Radeon Chip
> 9600XT (R360).
> I'm using Red Hat 9 and Xserver 4.3
> When I'm using the ati driver from ati web site than I can'n use DRI,
> because my comper freeze when X starts. I
Hi,
I have a problem with Asus 9600XT. This card have ATI Radeon Chip 9600XT
(R360).
I'm using Red Hat 9 and Xserver 4.3
When I'm using the ati driver from ati web site than I can'n use DRI,
because my comper freeze when X starts. If I disable DRI then I can use my
card in dual head mode.
When I'm
Hi,
I have problem with Dual Head settings fox XWindows on RedHat 9.
Can you somebody help me?
Ales Vojacek
XFree86.1.log
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I have one simple question when will be availiable drivers for Radeon
9600XT?
Is there anyone who try use Dual Head on this card?
When I try it works only in Clone mode. Now I using ati drivers from
ww.ati.com.
Thank you a lot and sorry for my english.
Ales
___
Hello,
I've been trying plenty of ways to deal with the following problem but
I can't find a way to solve it, therefore you guys are my last hope :-)
So here it is: I just bought a Dell Latitude D600 laptop with a
1024x768-capable screen, equipped with an ATI Radeon 9000 graphic card.
I also ow
nope. these are still patches at the moment. They'll probably be
included post 4.4 after some testing. setting the option enables
dynamic clock scaling. The various clocks will adjust their frequency
on the fly to save power.
Alex
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are these patches included in t
Are these patches included in the snapshot 4.4.0rc1 aka 4.3.99.901 and what
should they do if you set the option.
Tom Corner
On 17-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wrote:
> The patch available below adds dynamic power management support
> (dynamic clock scaling) to the radeon driver. It is based on code I've
Like I said before: If you MB is 8x you will need to patch your 2.4
kernel with 8x support (or if you can set your BIOS to 4x only mode) or
use a 2.6 kernel. once you have that done you can just use the DRI
snapshots. This will allow you to use 4x mode. if you want to use 8x,
you will have to a
I've got my new machine with the Radeon 9200. I want to try and setup the
hardware 3D support for it. I am going to build the latest development
snapshot and or the CVS and try to set it up. How stable are these? Do you
have any tips or suggestions on the building or configuration? Is there an
On December 3, 2003 03:37 pm, raf wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've got a problem. my DRI is not working. I dont know why, when i read
> the log i found som unresolved sytmbol... but i dont know what that means.
> glxinfo says: "direct rendering: No" and i would like to fix it.
> I use: ATI Radeon 9000 Pro on s
You know I've been trying to solve the ATI problem for a week or so...
but i havent succeded untill just now.
You've got the point there was problem with ATIS libGL.so after hundrets
of times compiling and changing XFree86Config-4!
At last... working!!
You cannot eaven imagine how grateful i
i'm sending output from glxinfo
Ian Romanick wrote:
raf wrote:
Hi
I've got a problem. my DRI is not working. I dont know why, when i
read the log i found som unresolved sytmbol... but i dont know what
that means.
glxinfo says: "direct rendering: No" and i would like to fix it.
I use: ATI Rade
raf wrote:
Hi
I've got a problem. my DRI is not working. I dont know why, when i read
the log i found som unresolved sytmbol... but i dont know what that means.
glxinfo says: "direct rendering: No" and i would like to fix it.
I use: ATI Radeon 9000 Pro on slackware 9.1, Athlon 2000 xp. motherboa
Hi
I've got a problem. my DRI is not working. I dont know why, when i read
the log i found som unresolved sytmbol... but i dont know what that means.
glxinfo says: "direct rendering: No" and i would like to fix it.
I use: ATI Radeon 9000 Pro on slackware 9.1, Athlon 2000 xp. motherboard
chipset
Hi
I've got a problem. my DRI is not working. I dont know why, when i read
the log i found som unresolved sytmbol... but i dont know what that means.
glxinfo says: "direct rendering: No" and i would like to fix it.
I use: ATI Radeon 9000 Pro on slackware 9.1, Athlon 2000 xp. motherboard
chipset
George Socker wrote:
OK, I tried changing it and rebuilding. It didn't fix it. The WinXP
driver doesn't have any problems, though. I can send you some video,
XP might use some "Direct Draw" YUV-Blit stuff instead of the video
overlay.
but files are very large(285MB) for just a couple of minutes
OK, I tried changing it and rebuilding. It didn't fix it. The WinXP
driver doesn't have any problems, though. I can send you some video,
but files are very large(285MB) for just a couple of minutes.
On Tuesday, November 25 2003 09:45 am, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I noticed that the other night as
I noticed that the other night as I was working on the driver, but I
didn't have any content large enough to test it with. I think it might
be a hold over from the old r128 driver. switch it to 2048x2048 and
give it a shot. It shouldn't hurt anything. If it works we can submit
a patch to get it
Hello.
I have a HD-2000 HDTV PCI card. When using the XVideo extension to
display HDTV format video, the right third of the image is a pink bar.
I have looked through the driver source and noticed that although the
maximum image size in radeon_video.c is 2048x2048 , the offscreen image
size i
Did you run the fglrxconfig? *I'm assuming you mean the binaries from ATI?
Gary
On November 20, 2003 03:04 pm, Joel Girard wrote:
> Suse 8.2 has XFree86 v4.3.0 and I downloaded the ATI Linux drivers for
> XFree86 v4.3.0 and it installs just fine. When I reboot I only get a
> console and no XWin
I'm not sure. You might check on the linux-kernel mailing list. or
search on google. I don't have an 8x motherboard so I've never looked
for it.
Alex
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where do I find the kernel patch for agp x8? I saw in a posting
> elsewhere that
> kernel 2.4.22 may support agp
Where do I find the kernel patch for agp x8? I saw in a posting elsewhere that
kernel 2.4.22 may support agp x8.
Tom
On 20-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wrote:
> one thing you will run into is that if your new motherboard supports 8x
> and your radeon supports 8x, you will need a patched version of agpg
one thing you will run into is that if your new motherboard supports 8x
and your radeon supports 8x, you will need a patched version of agpgart
that supports 8x or the DRI will not work if you are using linux 2.4.x.
2.6 supports 8x natively. Just a heads up.
Alex
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
I signed onto the developer list too now. When the computer comes, I am
thinking of trying driver snapshots or CVS versions. I have heard that ATI does
not support their own driver very well.
Thanks again,
Tom
On 20-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wrote:
> The drivers do not currently have support for agp
1. YOU update
2. Did you run susuconfig ???
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> nombre de Joel Girard
> Enviado el: jueves, 20 de noviembre de 2003 12:05
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: [XFree86] Radeon 8500 Dual Monitor in
Suse 8.2 has XFree86 v4.3.0 and I downloaded the ATI Linux drivers for XFree86
v4.3.0 and it installs just fine. When I reboot I only get a console and no
XWindows. Before the reboot I can even chose to have my second monitor expand
my desktop, but obviously it doesn't work when I reboot.
Any h
The drivers do not currently have support for agp 8x. Michel has a
patch on his website from ati, but it hasn't been applied/tested yet as
far as I know. I don't have the link off hand. I doubt you will
notice any difference between 8x and 4x.
Let me know how it goes.
Alex
--- [EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks. I don't get to test it until the laptop with radeon mobility 9200
comes next week. I understand the 9200 is the same as the 9000 except that the
agp is 8x instead of 4x. Can I specify agp 8x to take advantage of the higher
speed?
Thanks again,
Tom Corner
On 19-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wr
if you are running a cvs snapshot you can just copy the radeon_drv.o
and ati_drv.o into your current installation. If you are running
4.3.0, they should still work, but you will need to get a newer version
of the XFree86 binary. one is available here for instance:
http://www.botchco.com/alex/rade
Another question. Can you specify agp 8x for the radeon 9200
Thanks again,
Tom Corner
On 17-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wrote:
> The patch available below adds dynamic power management support
> (dynamic clock scaling) to the radeon driver. It is based on code I've
> been testing from Hui Yu. It seem
Can I just substitute the object modules or do I need to compile from source
all of xfree86?
Thanks,
Tom Corner
On 17-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wrote:
> The patch available below adds dynamic power management support
> (dynamic clock scaling) to the radeon driver. It is based on code I've
> been tes
The patch available below adds dynamic power management support
(dynamic clock scaling) to the radeon driver. It is based on code I've
been testing from Hui Yu. It seems to work fine in basic testing on my
m6 and the 9200 in my desktop. More testing would be much appreciated
(especially mobilit
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:03:13PM -0600, Roger Sunshine wrote:
> I recently bought a Radeon 9800 SE based card made by PowerColor (model
> r92le-c3s, box makred with a "SE" sticker) and a Viewsonic VX2000 LCD
> monitor and I can't get the DVI port to work well. I'm running RedHat 9
> and with the
The 9200SE cards seem to have some bandwidth issues driving large DVI
displays. There are some options you can try to improve the situation:
Option "DisplayPriority" "string"
where string is high, auto, or bios
and
Option "MonitorLayout" "tmds, none"
if you only have the dvi monitor attached. "tm
I recently bought a Radeon 9800 SE based card made by PowerColor (model
r92le-c3s, box makred with a "SE" sticker) and a Viewsonic VX2000 LCD
monitor and I can't get the DVI port to work well. I'm running RedHat 9
and with the X driver included with it and the chip id overridden to
just about any
Le 11.11.2003 00:32:51, John Xfree a écrit :
Hello,
I recently upgraded from a Matrox G450 to a Radeon 9100. I was a
little disappointed
in the results. I guess I was expecting too much. Anyway, for the
Radeon 8500/9100
folks out there, how do these numbers look?
I have a radeon 9200 with a
Hello,
I recently upgraded from a Matrox G450 to a Radeon 9100. I was a little
disappointed
in the results. I guess I was expecting too much. Anyway, for the Radeon
8500/9100
folks out there, how do these numbers look?
AMD Athlon 900 MHz
768 MB of RAM
Radeon 9100 64 MB (DDR) Sapphire Edition
Hi, I can affirm this,
AGPMode 2, EnablePageFLip off, AGPFastWrite off works
anything else except AGPMode 1 freezes my machine over.
XFree86 version: 4.3.99.15
Linux 2.4.22-ck2 SMP
Hercules Prophet 3D 9000 128MB
Tyan Tiger MP board with dual AMD Thunderbird 1.4GHz
1GB memory
Peter Zijlstra
On
Le 09.11.2003 11:31:25, Andrea Santilli a écrit :
Hello everybody!
A week ago I've bought a Sapphire Radeon 9000 Atlantis that is
powered
by ATI Radeon 9000 and I'm getting crazy to make it work properly on
Linux!
After trying the fglrx drivers from ATI website for Linux (that
didn't work),
I
Hello everybody!
A week ago I've bought a Sapphire Radeon 9000 Atlantis that is powered
by ATI Radeon 9000 and I'm getting crazy to make it work properly on Linux!
After trying the fglrx drivers from ATI website for Linux (that didn't
work),
I've noticed that XFree86 has problems to make the Radeo
1 - 100 of 284 matches
Mail list logo
