[xHarbour-developers] ChangeLog: 2012-09-29 19:05 UTC+0700 Andi Jahja

2012-09-29 Thread Andi Jahja
2012-09-29 19:05 UTC+0700 Andi Jahja * contrib/rddsql/hbrddsql.h ! temporarily sync with xHarbour RDDAPI * include/hbver.h ! version: 1.2.2 -> 1.2.3 Andi -- How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\

[xHarbour-developers] ChangeLog: 2012-09-29 19:05 UTC+0700 Andi Jahja

2012-09-29 Thread Andi Jahja
2012-09-29 19:05 UTC+0700 Andi Jahja * xharbour/branches/branche-1-2-2/contrib/rddsql/hbrddsql.h * xharbour/branches/branche-1-2-2/include/hbver.h ! version: 1.2.1 -> 1.2.2 Andi -- How fast is your code? 3 ou

Re: [xHarbour-developers] New version?

2012-09-29 Thread Patrick Mast, xHarbour
Deal!! ;-) On 29 Sep 2012, at 12:27, Andi Jahja wrote: > OK, then the current trunk is for 1.2.3 then, unless there is a > different proposal. > > Deal? > > Andi > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:28:19 +0200 > "Patrick Mast, xHarbour" wrote: > >> Hey Andi, >> >>> Very well! Thanks you. >> ;-) >>

Re: [xHarbour-developers] New version?

2012-09-29 Thread Andi Jahja
OK, then the current trunk is for 1.2.3 then, unless there is a different proposal. Deal? Andi On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:28:19 +0200 "Patrick Mast, xHarbour" wrote: > Hey Andi, > > > Very well! Thanks you. > ;-) > > > BTW, I notice that there are branches for 1.2.0, 1.2.1, and 1.2.2 (just > > n

Re: [xHarbour-developers] Warnings

2012-09-29 Thread Andi Jahja
Yes, a regression due to removal/changes of some define constants. I'll update it soon. Andi On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:19:59 +0200 "Enrico Maria Giordano" wrote: > Warning W8072 contrib\rddsql\sqlbase.c 199: Suspicious pointer arithmetic in > function sddGoTo > Warning W8072 contrib\rddsql\sqlbas

Re: [xHarbour-developers] New version?

2012-09-29 Thread Patrick Mast, xHarbour
Hey Andi, > Very well! Thanks you. ;-) > BTW, I notice that there are branches for 1.2.0, 1.2.1, and 1.2.2 (just > now). So, what should we name the trunk version now? 1.2.3 ? Yes, current trunk is to develop 1.2.3 OR 1.5 OR even 2.0. It is so long ago since we had a new official release, so I'm

[xHarbour-developers] Warnings

2012-09-29 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Warning W8072 contrib\rddsql\sqlbase.c 199: Suspicious pointer arithmetic in function sddGoTo Warning W8072 contrib\rddsql\sqlbase.c 200: Suspicious pointer arithmetic in function sddGoTo Warning W8072 contrib\rddsql\sqlbase.c 494: Suspicious pointer arithmetic in function sqlbaseGoCold Warning

Re: [xHarbour-developers] Building xHarbour with ADS

2012-09-29 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
-Messaggio Originale- Da: "Andi Jahja" A: "xHarbour Developers Mailing List" Data invio: sabato 29 settembre 2012 0.18 Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Building xHarbour with ADS > Fixed now. Thank you, Andi! EMG -- EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it The EMG'

Re: [xHarbour-developers] New version?

2012-09-29 Thread Patrick Mast, xHarbour
Hey Andi, I agree. Let me see how we can TAG this in SVN. Patrick > I am going to implement the use of common data types for xHarbour under > both 32 and 64-bit environment. > > As we can see, the current SVN define (example): ULONG is unsigned long > for 32/64-bit and it is very widely used. I

Re: [xHarbour-developers] New version?

2012-09-29 Thread Patrick Mast, xHarbour
Done! ;-) We now have: https://xharbour.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xharbour/branches/branche-1-2-2 So, if we need to change something for version 1.2.2, use above URL. Current development continues in current trunk: https://xharbour.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xharbour/trunk/xharbour Patrick >

Re: [xHarbour-developers] New version?

2012-09-29 Thread Andi Jahja
Patrick, Very well! Thanks you. BTW, I notice that there are branches for 1.2.0, 1.2.1, and 1.2.2 (just now). So, what should we name the trunk version now? 1.2.3 ? And if xharbour.org is to release official build, should it be a 1.2.2? For me, the number is just for marking a cut-off. Andi (r

Re: [xHarbour-developers] New version?

2012-09-29 Thread Andi Jahja
Patrick, TAG and create a branch for ver 1.2.1, IMO. Andi On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:07:35 +0200 "Patrick Mast, xHarbour" wrote: > Hey Andi, > > I agree. Let me see how we can TAG this in SVN. > > Patrick > > > I am going to implement the use of common data types for xHarbour under > > both 32