[xmail] Re: auto sign SMTP traffic

2002-09-12 Thread EDV - WHW (Goesta Smekal)
Finally, we seem to get closer ;-) On 12 Sep 2002 at 10:06, Davide Libenzi wrote: > it is not difficult to prove that a message come from your servers if you > really need, use the Received: trace. Anybody with slight computer skill can do so. But not 99% of the people, using mail. (excuse my

[xmail] Re: antivir

2002-09-12 Thread EDV - WHW (Goesta Smekal)
On 12 Sep 2002 at 20:07, Juan Hector Medina wrote: > Hi!. > > I installled the CLAMAV and the script from Goesta Smekal > and i send a email with virus to test the program... > and when i try to send and recive email, my email gets lock > I check my Mail directory in the server: > I have one

[xmail] Re: antivir

2002-09-12 Thread Juan Hector Medina
Hi!. I installled the CLAMAV and the script from Goesta Smekal and i send a email with virus to test the program... and when i try to send and recive email, my email gets lock I check my Mail directory in the server: I have one email and open it by terminal and is the mail that wrote the

[xmail] Re: paul .tab

2002-09-12 Thread Peter Lindeman
CR Little wrote: > I have had several e-mails come through which have viruses because my computers >antivirus scanner catches them. > how should the .tab look? > > mine says this. > > "/var/MailRoot/filters/checkvirus.pl" "@@FILE""@@FROM""@@RCPT" Are the TABS between the i

[xmail] spamassassin

2002-09-12 Thread Bill Healy
Has anyone ever figured out how to interface spamassassin with linux xmail? From what I can recall the issue was the extra 2 lines that xmail adds to the top of the message file making it not in RFC format. Has someone written a script to convert the messages to RFC format, pass them to spamassas

[xmail] Re: auto sign SMTP traffic

2002-09-12 Thread EDV - WHW (Goesta Smekal)
On 12 Sep 2002 at 9:54, Frederik Gallon wrote: > > Goesta & group, > > Is changing the content of the body of a mailmessage legal??? > Compare it with your postman opening your post and have 'I did deliver it > -your postman-' written on your paycheck f.i. (hehe i can't help it to > start smi

[xmail] Re: antivir xmail

2002-09-12 Thread EDV - WHW (Goesta Smekal)
On 11 Sep 2002 at 14:30, CR Little wrote: > I'm using f-prot as a virus scanner for xmail, it updates it self > every 12 hours, I am receiving e-mails with viruses attached can > somebody please help? Well, as stated before (by Peter Lindemann) it may depend on you filter script, not the sc

[xmail] Re: usersetmproc/usergetmproc

2002-09-12 Thread Webmaster 9euro
> > 1) how can I end the usersetmproc command using ctrlclnt? It seems to wait > > the timeout, unless I give a [ctrl]+c > >you give it a file name in the command line This is my command: c:\mailroot\bin\ctrlclnt -u Adminui -p Adminpw -s localhost usersetmproc domain.com user[newline] "redirec

[xmail] Re: auto sign SMTP traffic

2002-09-12 Thread Frederik Gallon
Goesta & group, Is changing the content of the body of a mailmessage legal??? Compare it with your postman opening your post and have 'I did deliver it -your postman-' written on your paycheck f.i. (hehe i can't help it to start smiling) Just curious how things are handled in your country? Fre

[xmail] Re: paul .tab

2002-09-12 Thread Frederik Gallon
Your LAN question in short: Get your client a domain (f.i. clientsdomain.com) Have their ISP setup MX records for clientsdomain pointing it out to the mailserver at their ISP. Have their ISP forward _all_ mail for clientsdomain.com into a pop3 mailbox. In Xmail you administer all local accounts,

[xmail] Re: auto sign SMTP traffic

2002-09-12 Thread EDV - WHW (Goesta Smekal)
On 11 Sep 2002 at 15:51, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, EDV - WHW (Goesta Smekal) wrote: > > > Well, technically speaking you are certainly right (you wrote the > > daemon anyway ;-) ) but what I need is an aproach, non-techs can > > easily understand. > > This is _really_ a t