[xmail] XMail 1.20 Smtp slow

2004-07-27 Thread Juan
Hello, my problem is that "sometimes" the SMTP o XMail gives TimeOut in Connection. When this happen, i have tested the POP and it works fine, the uptime is 0.2,0.3, 0.3, the number of process XMail is about 120 (i start Qn 100), and the network is OK, the swicht have no errors. I can see lik

[xmail] Re: XMAIL Queue Timing

2004-07-27 Thread Veeresh Khanorkar
Davide, I will love this stuff. Is it possible to do this? I will love to code this stuff. I think it can be implemented in two ways: * Time based delivery. * Event based delivery. ( For example as similar in psync, creation of a file .startdelivery will prompt XMail to start delivery of ma

[xmail] Re: XMail 1.20 Smtp slow

2004-07-27 Thread Goesta Smekal - IT executive
Sorry to say: this is a 'me too' posting ! (I posted before in April, but nothing realy helpful showed up) my setup is: Xmail 1.20 (was 1.18 in April, update didn't solve) Slackware Linux 8.0.0 gcc 2.95.3 Linux 2.4.9 LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 no filters at SMTP level, and RSS of XMail processec aft

[xmail] AW: Re: XMail 1.20 Smtp slow

2004-07-27 Thread Harald Schneider
If you guys have installed the .rpm, then pls try a built from the = source tar ball. Any differences ? --Harald > -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Goesta=20 > Smekal - IT executive > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juli 2004 15:14 >

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: XMail 1.20 Smtp slow

2004-07-27 Thread Goesta Smekal - IT executive
Am Die, den 27.07.2004 schrieb Harald Schneider um 15:33: > If you guys have installed the .rpm, then pls try a built from the = > source > tar ball. ..rpm on a slackware system ? not me ! ;-) > Any differences ? I won't try to install the .rpm just to see if this does any more harm ;-) Goesta

[xmail] DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
Hey Folks, I just had an email bounced back saying my mail server doesn't have a reverse DNS entry: > [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554 5.7.1 The > server sending your mail [209.12.136.106] does not have a reverse DNS > entry. Connection Rejected. Please contact your Dial-Up/DSL/

[xmail] Re: DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread Tracy
At 15:42 7/27/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: >Hey Folks, > >I just had an email bounced back saying my mail server doesn't have a reverse >DNS entry: > > > [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554 5.7.1 The > > server sending your mail [209.12.136.106] does not have a reverse DNS > > entry.

[xmail] Re: DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread Sergio Casagrande
You could try to use http://www.dnsreport.com/ to test your configuration. Ciao. Sergio C. Jeffrey Laramie wrote: >Hey Folks, > >I just had an email bounced back saying my mail server doesn't have a reverse >DNS entry: > > > >>[<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554 5.7.1 The >>serve

[xmail] Re: DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 16:09, Sergio Casagrande wrote: > You could try to use http://www.dnsreport.com/ to test your configuration. > Ciao. > Sergio C. > Great site. Thanks Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For g

[xmail] Re: DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 16:09, Tracy wrote: > At 15:42 7/27/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: > >Hey Folks, > > > >I just had an email bounced back saying my mail server doesn't have a > > reverse > > > >DNS entry: > > > [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554 5.7.1 The > > > server sending yo

[xmail] Re: DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread Tracy
At 16:23 7/27/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> nslookup >Note: nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases. >Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead. Run nslookup with >the `-sil[ent]' option to prevent this message from appearing. > > set type=ptr

[xmail] Re: DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread Ken Larkman
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Laramie > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Re: DNS Issue > > [SNIP] > > 106.136.12.209.in-addr.arpa name = NS1.Trans-Star.net. > > > > Hmmm

[xmail] Re: DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread John Kielkopf
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=209.12.136.106 Yeah, looks like you have no PTR record visible. Your bandwidth provider should be able to create it for you, or delegate a reverse lookup zone to you. -John Jeffrey Laramie wrote: >Hey Folks, > >I just had an email bounced back saying

[xmail] Re: DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 20:13, John Kielkopf wrote: > http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=209.12.136.106 > > Yeah, looks like you have no PTR record visible. Your bandwidth > provider should be able to create it for you, or delegate a reverse > lookup zone to you. > Yeah, this is pretty weird

[xmail] Re: DNS Issue

2004-07-27 Thread Tracy
At 21:32 7/27/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: >On Tuesday 27 July 2004 20:13, John Kielkopf wrote: > > http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=209.12.136.106 > > > > Yeah, looks like you have no PTR record visible. Your bandwidth > > provider should be able to create it for you, or delegate a revers