[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Me too :) >-Message d'origine- >De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi >Envoyé : lundi 30 octobre 2006 19:21 >À : XMail mailing list >Objet : [xmail] Poll ... > > > > >How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? > > > >- Davide > > >-

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Alexander Hagenah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? ++ -- Regards, Alexander Hageganh Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[xmail] 1.23 changelog ...

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
Ok, so far this is what's inside 1.23 changelog: - Check the mailbox size for every message coming into the mailbox (before it was only done during the SMTP phase). - Do not try to send to the 'A' record if the recipient domain does not exist at all (NXDOMAIN). Bounce immediately

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Chris L. Franklin
me 2 XTechie wrote: > Count me in. > > ~XT > Jeff Buehler wrote: > >> I don't need it right now, but I think it's an excellent idea to add it >> if it isn't a crazy amount of work. I can easily see needing it in the >> future... >> >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> >> Davide Libenzi wrote: >> >>>

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread XTechie
Count me in. ~XT Jeff Buehler wrote: > I don't need it right now, but I think it's an excellent idea to add it > if it isn't a crazy amount of work. I can easily see needing it in the > future... > > Thanks, > Jeff > > Davide Libenzi wrote: >> How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter

[xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Clive Lansink
I am already using SORBS and I see in the SMTP log that a lot of messages are rejected because of SORBS. But I still get a lot of spam from other servers that SORBS don't seem to know about. I checked on the SORBS web site to see if there is a way to report spammers but I only found informati

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Filip Supera
Davide Libenzi a écrit : > > How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? > +1 Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Dick van der Kaaden
On Monday 30 October 2006 19:20, Davide Libenzi wrote: > How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? > +1 Dick > > > - Davide > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the li

[xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Chad Fleenor wrote: > Can't you use the Stearns in the RBL list of the server.tab file? Indeed. Just dump your monster file into a local DNS, and add its entry to the CustMapsList. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body

[xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Chad Fleenor
Can't you use the Stearns in the RBL list of the server.tab file? Chad Norbert Doeberlein wrote: > This is from the XMail Forum: > > > > *** > > Thanks for the script but this file appears to be quite large (18MB), I > am wondering if this would cause Xmail to crash or

[xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Norbert Doeberlein wrote: > This is from the XMail Forum: > > > > *** > > Thanks for the script but this file appears to be quite large (18MB), I > am wondering if this would cause Xmail to crash or be slow if > implemented? > After a few minutes

[xmail] spam-address.tab size

2006-10-30 Thread Norbert Doeberlein
This is from the XMail Forum: *** Thanks for the script but this file appears to be quite large (18MB), I am wondering if this would cause Xmail to crash or be slow if implemented? After a few minutes running on my main server, about 500 accounts, Xmail stopped respondi

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Jeff Buehler
I don't need it right now, but I think it's an excellent idea to add it if it isn't a crazy amount of work. I can easily see needing it in the future... Thanks, Jeff Davide Libenzi wrote: > How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? > > > > - Davide > > > - > To unsubscribe

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Tracy
Oh! Oh! Me! Me! :) Davide Libenzi wrote: > > How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? > > > > - Davide > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in

[xmail] Re: Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread John Kielkopf
I would. Davide Libenzi wrote: > How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? > > > > - Davide > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a messa

[xmail] Poll ...

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Shiloh Jennings wrote: > > In the business world, end users only care if the recipient received the > email they sent. They don't not know or care anything about RFC = > compliance. > I agree RFC compliance is important, but it should not trump the real = > world > concerns

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-30 Thread Shiloh Jennings
In the business world, end users only care if the recipient received the email they sent. They don't not know or care anything about RFC compliance. I agree RFC compliance is important, but it should not trump the real world concerns of end users. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTE

[xmail] Re: Local domain and trailing dot

2006-10-30 Thread CLEMENT Francis
I agree with Davide RFC not only apply to MTA but to MUA too and to final users too (programs or humans) :) As the MUA interacts with the user, it's to the MUA responsibility to correct the user (automaticaly or not) if users can't be made RFC compliant ( hard to achieve :) ). Francis >-M

[xmail] Re: Email address reverse check

2006-10-30 Thread CLEMENT Francis
>-Message d'origine- >De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de decker >Envoyé : lundi 30 octobre 2006 12:41 >À : xmail@xmailserver.org >Objet : [xmail] Re: Email address reverse check > > > >Hellos, > >I'm on a different comp than usual so I may be off here since I'm

[xmail] Re: Email address reverse check

2006-10-30 Thread Helio Cavichiolo Jr
Em Sexta 27 Outubro 2006 21:04, Kirk Friggstad escreveu: > From http://xmailserver.org/Readme.html#server_tab_variables > > [AllowNullSender] > Enable null sender ('MAIL FROM:<>') messages to be accepted by XMail. Thanks Kirk, it solved the problem. Helio - To unsubscribe from this list: sen

[xmail] Re: Email address reverse check

2006-10-30 Thread decker
Hellos, I'm on a different comp than usual so I may be off here since I'm missing the earlier discussion about this. > The program used on the other side to do the 'reverse check' is > simple not RFC compliant :) > (Does the 'reverse check' an integrated Exim fonctionnality or an > add-on ? I do

[xmail] Re: Email address reverse check

2006-10-30 Thread CLEMENT Francis
The program used on the other side to do the 'reverse check' is simple not RFC compliant :) (Does the 'reverse check' an integrated Exim fonctionnality or an add-on ? I don't know ...) The exact RFC "mail from" syntax IS : MAIL FROM: IMOO, changing xmail to accept no rfc compliant programms is