Hello Davide,
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
This would be a very nice to have, as each user can then control their
own settings etc.
I was actually looking at making this a filter code decision. By
default filter runs, but if user chooses to not have this
Hello Clive,
Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:27:09 PM, you wrote:
I am already using SORBS and I see in the SMTP log that a lot of messages a=
re rejected because of SORBS. But I still get a lot of spam from other ser=
vers that SORBS don't seem to know about. I checked on the SORBS web site
Hi Davide,
On 30.10.2006 19:20, Davide Libenzi wrote:
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
I'm voting for this, too. But how is your idea of implementation if more
than one RCPTS are given by the client?
I guess the filter will be executed once for every RCPT - the
On 30 Oct 2006 at 10:20, Davide Libenzi wrote:
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
Count me in
--
Harri Nykänen
Hyljetie 19 A
02260 ESPOO
FINLAND
mobile: +358 (0)50 4110 400
http://www.nykanen.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail
Me too!
More polls for more features :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes please
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, 31 October 2006 5:21 AM
To: XMail
Soenke Ruempler wrote:
Hi Davide,
On 30.10.2006 19:20, Davide Libenzi wrote:
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
I'm voting for this, too. But how is your idea of implementation if more
than one RCPTS are given by the client?
I guess the filter will be
So how would you go about dumping a file to a local DNS? Is there a
link to point me in the right direction?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 14:39
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail]
Hello all,
Regarding the mailbox full warning:
How about a filter flag that only executes the filter if the users mailbox
is full (or over a warning quota) and an argument to pass the current
mailbox size? Would be an easy way to implement own mailbox-full
notifications, or even cut off the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Tracy wrote:
It should be possible, based on return code to make only the recipient
fail. For example, let's say the filter returns 4 (to reject this
recipient). The SMTP fail code could be 471, which means only this
recipient failed. However, if the filter returns 4
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Jorn Hass wrote:
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
This would be a very nice to have, as each user can then control their
own settings etc.
I was actually looking at making this a filter code decision. By
default filter runs, but if user
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Norbert Doeberlein wrote:
So how would you go about dumping a file to a local DNS? Is there a
link to point me in the right direction?
Well, bind has the ability (through a bind library API) to live-update the
server by issuing commands.
The easiest way is probably to
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Soenke Ruempler wrote:
On 30.10.2006 19:20, Davide Libenzi wrote:
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
I'm voting for this, too. But how is your idea of implementation if more
than one RCPTS are given by the client?
Post-RCPT filters are
On 31.10.2006 17:46, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Post-RCPT filters are executed after each RCPT_TO submitted by the SMTP
client. You have the ability to validate them on a per-RCPT basis.
Got it. The poll was meant for POST-RCPT filter. Not the traditional
SMTP filter
I must be having a brain fart because I am not following the purpose
behind using DNS for this. Spam-address.tab is loaded with email
addresses in the format [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How does DNS tie into this list? RBL's look for IP addresses, correct?
It is Monday and I've only had one cup of
Yeah...
It's Tuesday and I'll be heading to the coffee shop now. Good thing the
liquor store is on the way... :)
-Original Message-
To: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Subject: RE: [xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size
I must be having a brain fart because I am not following the purpose
A coffee shop in the Netherlands is probable something else than it is in
your country... ;)
As far as I know, coffeeshops usually don't serve coffee over here.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffeehouse#Cannabis_coffee_shops)
- Original Message -
From: Norbert Doeberlein [EMAIL
Here is 1.23-pre04:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.23-pre04.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.23-pre04.win32bin.zip
This is the changelog:
- Added strictier SMTP address validation.
- Check the mailbox size for every message coming into the mailbox (before
it was only done
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Soenke Ruempler wrote:
On 31.10.2006 17:46, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Post-RCPT filters are executed after each RCPT_TO submitted by the SMTP
client. You have the ability to validate them on a per-RCPT basis.
Got it. The poll was meant for POST-RCPT filter. Not the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Norbert Doeberlein wrote:
I must be having a brain fart because I am not following the purpose
behind using DNS for this. Spam-address.tab is loaded with email
addresses in the format [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How does DNS tie into this list? RBL's look for IP addresses,
I feel better now, but I think I might take Ivo up on a visit to his
local coffee shop. ;-)
Since we're starting from scratch, is a 10MB spam-address.tab too large
and if so, is there an alternative?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Norbert Doeberlein wrote:
I feel better now, but I think I might take Ivo up on a visit to his
local coffee shop. ;-)
Since we're starting from scratch, is a 10MB spam-address.tab too large
and if so, is there an alternative?
You can try to drop that inside a DB and
I'm in :)
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org
To: XMail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:20 AM
Subject: [xmail] Poll ...
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
- Davide
-
To
23 matches
Mail list logo
