I actually use both, but not in XMail. I use ClamAV with ASSP and then
hand it off to XMail which scans w/F-Prot. Since ASSP does all the
delaying, rejecting, ... it keeps the spool directory really clean.
Just my opinion.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I use both ClamAV and F-Prot, every message gets scanned twice.
Brian wrote:
Any opinions on using ClamAV with XMail?
How good is ClamAV and is it secure / stable?
Jason
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I use ASSP withlut ClamAV, then the email is scanned by ClamSMTP WITH
ClamAV. ASSP's implementation is less complete than ClamSMTP which
does a deep scan. Then XMail gets the email for delivery. This has
worked great up until XMail 1.24, but now I seem to be having time out
problems with XMail.
I would prefer this method, but I'm running on W32 platform and ClamSMTP
does not.=20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff Buehler
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 10:45
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: ClamAV usage with
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi Everyone -
I have been getting XMail timeouts, along with CPU use going up to
something like 98%, after upgrading to 1.24. I am not 100% certain that
the upgrade is what is causing this, so I am looking for ideas. I did
not have any problems
