[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF

2007-04-27 Thread CLEMENT Francis
This 'forwarding' issue is resolved with 'SRS' (Sender Rewriting = Scheme) that complements SPF. In fact SPF allways need SRS :) (except on final smtp servers that you are sure it's not possible to = forward to foreign servers that are not controlled by you) The couple SPF + SRS can be called

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF

2007-04-27 Thread Bart Mortelmans
SRS has a couple of problems, which make me assume that it's not going to really get anywhere: 1) If you implement SPF, then you have to rely on the fact that forwarding services of your recipients implemented SRS. 2) The from address gets mocked up. Making it not very user readable. 3) The

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF

2007-04-27 Thread CLEMENT Francis
-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart Mortelmans Envoy=E9 : vendredi 27 avril 2007 09:41 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF SRS has a couple of problems, which make me assume that it's not going = to

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF

2007-04-27 Thread Bart Mortelmans
Thanks for clearing that out! Then my next question would be: is there something that would implement SRS in forwarding within XMailserver? Sincerely, Bart Mortelmans CLEMENT Francis wrote: -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF

2007-04-27 Thread CLEMENT Francis
-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart Mortelmans Envoy=E9 : vendredi 27 avril 2007 11:17 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF Thanks for clearing that out! Then my next question would be: is there

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS

2007-04-27 Thread Edmonds, J.B.
That's exactly my concern. I could be paying 3 cents per recipient to have the mail relayed, just to have it blocked anyway since the recipient's server does not allow relayed traffic from any source.=20 I am looking for a better solution. JB Edmonds -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[xmail] News DNS problem with 1.25pre09 not in 1.24

2007-04-27 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Hello Davide and list : I upgraded to 1.25pre09 from 1.24 to test new 'dns' resolver in xmail. Here is a report from xmail 1.25pre09 that I never get with 1.24 for the same destination domain : === [00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[Recipient domain haworth.com does

[xmail] Re: Testing after 1.24

2007-04-27 Thread Rob Arends
The cause of not getting email from xmail-list after upgrade to 1.24 = will be that x35.xmailserver.org is attempting to negotiate TLS, when you do = not have TLS correctly configured - either fully off, or with correct certificates. Please search the archives to find the answers either way.

[xmail] Re: XP Issue

2007-04-27 Thread Edmonds, J.B.
Sorry but I did read the manual. The DLLs are properly placed and the environment variables as well as registry entries appear correct. I suspected a SSL issue but I followed the instructions. Is there a step to be assumed but unwritten? Am I missing a SERVER.TAB entry that is new??

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS

2007-04-27 Thread Rob Arends
First thing to find out is if your ISP will allow you to relay for free. Second thing is, if you use SPF records, then include your ISP outgoing IP address(es) in your SPF record. Then if at least #1, then relay via ISP. Those MTAs that deny mail from dynamic IPs, must not deny from the MTAs of

[xmail] Dynamic DNS and Relay

2007-04-27 Thread Edmonds, J.B.
I have identified a potential solution to my issue of email being blocked because of Dynamic DNS but having some difficulty understanding how to implement it in xmail I can route all outgoing traffic through another mail server (relay), however it requires me to authenticate (ID and Password).

[xmail] Re: XP Issue

2007-04-27 Thread Rob Arends
J.B., The ONLY time I've had an error re: failed to load (etc.) is when I've missed the supporting library (required =1.24) My usual diagnosis, is to google the error text. What do you get when you do this? Rob :-) _ Note To Self: Remember to

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS

2007-04-27 Thread Edmonds, J.B.
Thanks, it appears I can relay but must logon, presenting a different setup up problem. How to do this in xmail?=20 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Arends Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:01 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject:

[xmail] Re: Testing after 1.24

2007-04-27 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
You are right! Thanks for you help.. Regards Edinilson - ATINET-Professional Web Hosting Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876 http://www.atinet.com.br - Original Message - From: Rob Arends [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xmail@xmailserver.org Cc:

[xmail] 1.25pre09 on Windows 2000

2007-04-27 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
Davide, which configurations in server.tab do you want to test 1.25pre09 on Windows 2000 (Xmail Win32)? I was stucked here for a while and now I could upgrade and test this newer version on a very busy server (and report you problems). Edinilson

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS and Relay

2007-04-27 Thread CLEMENT Francis
See section SMTP CLIENT AUTHENTICATION in xmail doc to do outgoing = AUTH As noted : If your 'relayer' host server have the name thegoodrelayserver.somegoodisp.com then added a file named 'thegoodrelayserver.somegoodisp.com.tab' in mailroot/userauth/smtp subdirectory and in this file set the

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS

2007-04-27 Thread Rob Arends
See here: http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#smtp_client_authentication Either set up server.tab defaultsmtpgateway[tab]mail.isp.com Or add to smtpgw.tab *[tab]mail.isp.com Then in $mailroot/userauth/smtp create file mail.isp.com.tab In it add LOGIN[tab]username[tab]password Now, I've

[xmail] Re: News DNS problem with 1.25pre09 not in 1.24

2007-04-27 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote: Hello Davide and list : I upgraded to 1.25pre09 from 1.24 to test new 'dns' resolver in xmail. Here is a report from xmail 1.25pre09 that I never get with 1.24 for the same destination domain : === [00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL

[xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF

2007-04-27 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote: Davide wrote a perl filter for spf (smtp receiver side), but : No it did not. I also stopped using it. For me RBLs+GLST do the job and are less error prone. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of

[xmail] Re: 1.25pre09 on Windows 2000

2007-04-27 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: Davide, which configurations in server.tab do you want to test 1.25pre09 on Windows 2000 (Xmail Win32)? I was stucked here for a while and now I could upgrade and test this newer version on a very busy server (and report you problems). I