I would prefer this method, but I'm running on W32 platform and ClamSMTP
does not.=20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff Buehler
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 10:45
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: ClamAV usage
I use ASSP withlut ClamAV, then the email is scanned by ClamSMTP WITH
ClamAV. ASSP's implementation is less complete than ClamSMTP which
does a deep scan. Then XMail gets the email for delivery. This has
worked great up until XMail 1.24, but now I seem to be having time out
problems with XMail.
I use both ClamAV and F-Prot, every message gets scanned twice.
Brian wrote:
> Any opinions on using ClamAV with XMail?
> How good is ClamAV and is it secure / stable?
>
> Jason
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Lord
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 22:18
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: ClamAV usage with XMail
On 12 Feb 2007, at 20:28, Brian wrote:
> Any opinions on using ClamAV with XMail?
> How good is ClamAV and is it secure / stable?
=20
I installed both
On 12 Feb 2007, at 20:28, Brian wrote:
> Any opinions on using ClamAV with XMail?
> How good is ClamAV and is it secure / stable?
I installed both fprot and clamav on NetBSD with intention of using
whichever I managed to get working first which turned out to be
fprot. I've no reason to suspect
