[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-24 Thread Bill Healy
MAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 4:59 AM >To:xmail@xmailserver.org >Subject: [xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report >ed >earlier?) > >Jeff, > >There are firewalls out there that consider traffic in and out of the

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-24 Thread Rob Arends
half Of Jeff Buehler Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 4:02 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?) Hi Rob - That is more or less what is happening, but I'm not clear about the specifics. I'm finding it a bit of a mystery

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-23 Thread Jeff Buehler
t; -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jeff Buehler > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 11:36 AM > To: xmail@xmailserver.org > Subject: [xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed > earlier?) > > Hi D

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-23 Thread Rob Arends
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Buehler Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 11:36 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?) Hi Davide - Sorry about the delay on this - I was in away yesterday and today... Here is

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-22 Thread Jeff Buehler
Hi Davide - Sorry about the delay on this - I was in away yesterday and today... Here is a sample of the dig + trace - I copied only the last two entries - basically this pattern is repeated until the "too many lookups" result. The other domains this server is authoritative for produce the sa

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-21 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote: > By the way, the trace does, and always has, produced the correct name > servers (dns1.buehlertech.net and dns2.buehlertech.net), it just > continues to trace after that result. Do they set the correct AUTHORITY bit in the answer? - Davide - To uns

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-21 Thread Jeff Buehler
; server (so the Monowall external ip) ? >> dig @monowall-external-internet-ip trikorausa.com +trace >> >> Francis >> >> >> >> >> -Message d'origine- >> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jeff Buehl

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-21 Thread Jeff Buehler
+trace > > Francis > > > > > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jeff Buehler > Envoy=E9 : jeudi 21 f=E9vrier 2008 17:12 > =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org > Objet : [xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-21 Thread CLEMENT Francis
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jeff Buehler Envoy=E9 : jeudi 21 f=E9vrier 2008 17:12 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report = ed earlier?) I should also clarify, as you mention users, that none of this has=20 anythin

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-21 Thread Jeff Buehler
gt;> autoritive dns server for the zone :) >> (Notice that doing so if your local dns is behind a nat server, you = >> could >> face a commom 'nat firewall' loopback issue. I can explain if you want) >> >> Francis >> >> >> -Messag

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-21 Thread Jeff Buehler
; face a commom 'nat firewall' loopback issue. I can explain if you want) > > Francis > > > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jeff Buehler > Envoy=E9 : mercredi 20 f=E9vrier 2008 20:35 > =C0 : xmail@xmai

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-21 Thread CLEMENT Francis
art de Jeff Buehler Envoy=E9 : mercredi 20 f=E9vrier 2008 20:35 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report = ed earlier?) Hi Davide - Yes, it works from an external line, but not from the server itself. I = am trying to figure out why provi

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread Jeff Buehler
Hi Davide - Yes, it works from an external line, but not from the server itself. I am trying to figure out why providing the authoritative DNS for that domain (pointing to another server on the net which provides everything else for the domain) causes the failure - it seems to be looping, whic

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote: > OK, just to add to my confusion, here is part of what is going on - this > server also provides the authoritative DNS for trikorausa.com (but not > local DNS queries or caching!). It does not provide any other services > for trikorausa.com (no email e

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Hello Davide > > Recently I asked you how SMARTDnshost variable affected xmail internal > resolver, and you said that when using SmartDnsHost, xmail only ask for = > the > 'final' request (directly the mx lookup without trying first soa, ns, = >

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread Jeff Buehler
OK, just to add to my confusion, here is part of what is going on - this server also provides the authoritative DNS for trikorausa.com (but not local DNS queries or caching!). It does not provide any other services for trikorausa.com (no email etc.) - the records point to an outside address.

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

2008-02-20 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Hello Davide Recently I asked you how SMARTDnshost variable affected xmail internal resolver, and you said that when using SmartDnsHost, xmail only ask for = the 'final' request (directly the mx lookup without trying first soa, ns, = ) I asked this because I had the same problem as Jeff but