On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> It looks like XMail is still 'restarting'. Here is my start
> script:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> rm /var/MailRoot/bin/db.log 2> /dev/null
> export MAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot
> /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail -Pl -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ql -Ll -PI 207.175.219.202 -SI
> 207.175.219.202
On Saturday 13 March 2004 12:51 pm, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> 63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> version=2.63
>
> On Saturday 13 March 2004 12:35 pm, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Ouch! how is it possible? Those
On Saturday 13 March 2004 12:35 pm, Beau E. Cox wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Ouch! how is it possible? Those messages:
> >
> > SMAIL thread [00] started
> > SMAIL thread [01] started
>
> [...]
>
> > are printed only at XMail boot time, and your posting repeat them over
> > and over.
>
> OK.
>
> The good ne
On Saturday 13 March 2004 10:52 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> sin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> version=2.63
>
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > On Saturday 13 March 2004 09:47 am, Davide Libenzi
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>Well, get back to work to finish IMAP then ;-)
>
> Since this is an extremely critical component, I'd really like more
> reports and testing. I still did not hear anything from BSD and Solaris
> folks ...
Well I'll keep it running here, if I notice anything strange I le
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >>pre 09 is now also running on my system and messages are coming in. Did
> >>you find the problem then in pre08 why it probably wasn't working here?
> >
> >
> > It looks like :-) (missed signal handling)
>
> Well, get bac
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>pre 09 is now also running on my system and messages are coming in. Did
>>you find the problem then in pre08 why it probably wasn't working here?
>
>
> It looks like :-) (missed signal handling)
Well, get back to work to finish IMAP then ;-)
--
Groeten,
Peter
WinErr
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >>>Mind giving this one a shot:
> >>>
> >>>http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre09.tar.gz
> >>
> >>The first test messages did come through ;-)
> >
> >
> > I am trying to simulate multiple Perl script filters on my test
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>>Mind giving this one a shot:
>>>
>>>http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre09.tar.gz
>>
>>The first test messages did come through ;-)
>
>
> I am trying to simulate multiple Perl script filters on my test machine,
> and messages are correctly processed with pre09:
>
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >>the line "Mail was allready scanned" comes out of my filter so that is
> >>correct.
> >>
> >>Can I do some more "research" ?
> >
> >
> > Mind giving this one a shot:
> >
> > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre09.ta
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>the line "Mail was allready scanned" comes out of my filter so that is
>>correct.
>>
>>Can I do some more "research" ?
>
>
> Mind giving this one a shot:
>
> http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre09.tar.gz
The first test messages did come through ;-)
--
Groeten,
P
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> This is in slog log :
>
> [PeekTime] 1079210866 : Sat, 13 Mar 2004 21:47:46 +0100
>
> and the message is then in ../mess dir completely in tact where I can
> see the added AV header but not yet an added SpamAssassin header. (first
> the AV runs he
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>No all entrances are for 0.0.0.0/0 but I have some entrances for several
>>emailadresses and some entrances for mail from specified email adresses.
>>
>>You are asking for info during a debug run, but when I use debug info
>>(-Md parm) it works so what can I do exactly?
>
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Saturday 13 March 2004 09:47 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > sin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> > version=2.63
> >
> > On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
On Saturday 13 March 2004 09:47 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> sin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> version=2.63
>
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > SMAIL thread [00] started
>
> [...]
>
> Why are yo
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>No all entrances are for 0.0.0.0/0 but I have some entrances for several
>>emailadresses and some entrances for mail from specified email adresses.
>>
>>You are asking for info during a debug run, but when I use debug info
>>(-Md parm) it works so what can I do exactly?
>
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> No all entrances are for 0.0.0.0/0 but I have some entrances for several
> emailadresses and some entrances for mail from specified email adresses.
>
> You are asking for info during a debug run, but when I use debug info
> (-Md parm) it works so wha
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> SMAIL thread [00] started
[...]
Why are you restarting XMail each time?
Did it get stuck w/out sending the message?
Can you try sending three message with different sender, so that we can
try to see the exact message that is currently processed?
Can you
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>My own AV filter and SpamAssassin filter by Don Drake. I can see that
>>the AV filter has allready run because it adds a header to the message
>>and this is added . What extra info do you want to have?
>
>
> Are you using address masks different from 0.0.0.0/0 ?
> An XM
On Saturday 13 March 2004 06:53 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > > I think I am running debug mode. My command line:
> > >
> > >
> > > XMAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot
> > > XMAIL_CMD_LINE="-Pl -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ql -Ll -PI 207
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
>
> > I think I am running debug mode. My command line:
> >
> >
> > XMAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot
> > XMAIL_CMD_LINE="-Pl -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ql -Ll -PI 207.175.219.202 -SI
> > 207.175.219.202 -Md"
>
> Just run from the
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> I think I am running debug mode. My command line:
>
>
> XMAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot
> XMAIL_CMD_LINE="-Pl -Sl -Fl -Cl -Ql -Ll -PI 207.175.219.202 -SI
> 207.175.219.202 -Md"
Just run from the command line:
# export MAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot
# /var/MailRoot/
On Saturday 13 March 2004 06:25 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > 2) It _seems_ that when I send a message to myself, it's stuck until
> > another message arrives, then that message is stuck, etc.
> >
> > 3) With 'attach.pl' running (it's last in filters.in.tab
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> 2) It _seems_ that when I send a message to myself, it's stuck until another
> message arrives, then that message is stuck, etc.
>
> 3) With 'attach.pl' running (it's last in filters.in.tab) the SpamAssassin
> sa_filter.pl - which _always_ changes the mes
On Saturday 13 March 2004 04:49 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
> >
> > My archive (saves all incoming msgs to disk) and SpamAssassin's
> > sa_filter.pl work fine.
> >
> > attach.pl (that I got from your si
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> My own AV filter and SpamAssassin filter by Don Drake. I can see that
> the AV filter has allready run because it adds a header to the message
> and this is added . What extra info do you want to have?
Are you using address masks different from 0.0.0
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>>http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
>>
>>pre08 is definitly *not* working correct here. When I send a message it
>>goes through 2 filters here, after that the message should be delivered.
>>but this version does not deliver the message, it stays "somewhere
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
>
> My archive (saves all incoming msgs to disk) and SpamAssassin's
> sa_filter.pl work fine.
>
> attach.pl (that I got from your site - I didn't write it)
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> # Script by Igor Reno
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
>
> pre08 is definitly *not* working correct here. When I send a message it
> goes through 2 filters here, after that the message should be delivered.
> but this version
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>>http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
>>
>>Running pre07 since last night. Is there is problem with filter
>>return code 7 (message changed)? It looks like messages are not
>>recognized as changed after running throught sa_filter.pl for
>>spamc in SpamAssassin
On Friday 12 March 2004 04:55 pm, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2004 12:10 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > ssin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> > version=2.63
> >
> >
> > This is 1.18-pre08 and i
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2004 12:10 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre08.tar.gz
>
> Running pre07 since last night. Is there is problem with filter
> return code 7 (message changed)? It looks like messages are not
> reco
On Friday 12 March 2004 12:10 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> ssin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> version=2.63
>
>
> This is 1.18-pre08 and it is running fine on xmailserver.org (low load).
> Once again, I'd ap
33 matches
Mail list logo
