[xmail] Re: Idea: Policy levels

2004-06-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Davide - to fully support the way you just said it should be done - we need > you to change the way domain and user mailproc.tabs are processed. It's in my queue. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the b

[xmail] Re: Idea: Policy levels

2004-06-30 Thread tonys
ay, June 30, 2004 9:24 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Idea: Policy levels > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Tracy wrote: > > > > > This is not a feature request - it's as yet too inchoate. More a request > > for the various people on the list to kick the idea around and see if it &g

[xmail] Re: Idea: Policy levels

2004-06-30 Thread Tracy
At 00:39 7/1/2004, Rob Arends wrote: >Tracy - your at it again!! > >Now I follow what your trying to do and I *know* what Davide will say - "use >pre-data filters". > >It sounds like a good idea if not a little esoteric. >I think there is a very small market out there for this and as such will not

[xmail] Re: Idea: Policy levels

2004-06-30 Thread Tracy
At 00:24 7/1/2004, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > Now, obviously, each of these users requests would represent a policy > level > > on the types and sources of mail that can be sent to those accounts. For > > instance, Larry might represent policy level 0 (unrestricted), Moe > might be > > policy leve

[xmail] Re: Idea: Policy levels

2004-06-30 Thread Rob Arends
Tracy - your at it again!! Now I follow what your trying to do and I *know* what Davide will say - "use pre-data filters". It sounds like a good idea if not a little esoteric. I think there is a very small market out there for this and as such will not be included in xmail itself. Your trying to

[xmail] Re: Idea: Policy levels

2004-06-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Tracy wrote: > > This is not a feature request - it's as yet too inchoate. More a request > for the various people on the list to kick the idea around and see if it > has any value to anyone other than me. If it does, perhaps we can firm it > up into a feature request for