Davide Libenzi a écrit :
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Tim Aranki wrote:
>
>
>>Filip,
>>Do you have a catch all alias setup? My guess, is that it did not relay the
>>message, but rather delivered it to your catch all account.
>
>
> This is likely the case, since XMail does not support [EMAIL PROTECT
Mircea Ciocan a écrit :
> Eh Davide, maybe is time to have the smtprelay.tab with
> "127.0.0.1"[TAB]"255.255.255.255", the rpms I build are this way, it
> seem that NOBODY read the documentation BEFORE installing and starting
> Xmailserver :(.
This is not true :-) I did read it.
>
>
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Tim Aranki wrote:
> Filip,
> Do you have a catch all alias setup? My guess, is that it did not relay the
> message, but rather delivered it to your catch all account.
This is likely the case, since XMail does not support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from
Filip,
Do you have a catch all alias setup? My guess, is that it did not relay the
message, but rather delivered it to your catch all account.
-tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Filip Supera
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 11:28 AM
To:
Eh Davide, maybe is time to have the smtprelay.tab with
"127.0.0.1"[TAB]"255.255.255.255", the rpms I build are this way, it
seem that NOBODY read the documentation BEFORE installing and starting
Xmailserver :(.
Filip just clear everything in the smtprelay.tab and put only this
line: "
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mircea Ciocan
Sent: 16 January 2004 16:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
Ben Ede wrote:
>HI,
>
>I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay
>check on i
ge-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bowen Moursund
Sent: 16 January 2004 16:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
> I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay
> check on it and unfortunately
Ben Ede wrote:
>HI,
>
>I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay
>check on it and unfortunately it has come back as saying there are
>vulnerabilities. I have used the 'out of the box' config. Can anyone
>point me in the right direction to sort out these probs?
>
>Thanks
>
> I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay
> check on it and unfortunately it has come back as saying there are
> vulnerabilities. I have used the 'out of the box' config. Can anyone
> point me in the right direction to sort out these probs?
As noted in the documentation
t Solution
Enviado el: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:19 PM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [xmail] Re: Open Relay & SPAM
Could you give me the example how to do it in detail?
Cause I want to make sure it safe, otherwise I would get another security
ticket from Spamcop.
Thanks,
Joe
- Or
esday, July 16, 2003 4:12 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay & SPAM
>
> Why bother with all that? Just use optional SMTP auth + pop3 before smtp
> auth. It works and its just as secure.
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> nombr
: [xmail] Re: Open Relay & SPAM
I couldn't test again & again with abuse.net, so I telnet to
relay-test.mail-abuse.org
The all test results are "...relay denied..." when I used
SMTPRELAY.tab
"205.xxx.xxx.0" "255.255.255.0"
The SMTP.IPMAP.tab content still s
er, right?
3. So nothing to do with relay, doesn't it?
4. If I would like to allow one IP, let say 205.100.10.1 so
SMTPRELAY.tab
"205.xxx.xxx.1" "255.255.255.255" ??
Thanks,
Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Multisoft Solution wrote:
>
> I am pretty new in XMail and I do testing in Linux RedHat 9.1
> I got a message from our ISP that SPAMCOP told our XMail testing server has
> become spammers server/open relay I guess.
> Yesterday I close the open relay through a change at:
> SMT
-
From: "Steven Peck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:51 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >=20
> > On Tue
> -Original Message-
> From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=20
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Steven Peck wrote:
>=20
> >
> > That IP Address is listed in two open relay databases.
> > http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=3D24.94.213.208
>=20
> It does not look like that to me. Th
gt;
> or should it be
>
> "EnableAuthSMTP-POP3""1"
>
> because if it is set to 1, then my client doesn't have to authenticate,
but
> if at 0, then it does. And I want it to do smtp-auth.
>
> benny
>
> - Original Message -
>
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Benny
Enviado el: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 6:24 PM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [xmail] Re: open relay
You are right Seth, and of course that makes sense. But am I correct in
having:
"EnableAuthSMTP-POP3""0"
or
"0"
smtp is never opened and must always be authenticated (unless the ip is in
your smtprelay.tab file)
-Seth
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Benny
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail]
does. And I want it to do smtp-auth.
benny
- Original Message -
From: "Seth A. Munroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:22 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
>
> When you perform the test, you have to tell the test
, it IS
NOT
an open relay.
---
So it shows it as being an open relay.
benny
- Original Message -----
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
Here is the email I get from the test site http://abuse.net
-
This is a test of third-party mail relay, generated via the
That IP Address is listed in two open relay databases.
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=3D24.94.213.208
> -Original Message-
> From: Benny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
ECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Benny wrote:
>
> > Ok,
> >
> > I have my smtprelay.tab file blank, and I have "EnableAuthSMTP-POP3"
> > "0" in server.tab. I set my mai
other tests
come back as open relay.
benny
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Benny wrote:
>
> > Ok,
>
-
From: "Gustavo Galvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:00 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
>
> You have:
> "EnableAuthSMTP-POP3" "0"
> and must be:
> "EnableAuthSMTP-POP3"
You have:
"EnableAuthSMTP-POP3" "0"
and must be:
"EnableAuthSMTP-POP3" "1"
Gustavo
- Original Message -
From: "Benny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: [xmail] open relay
> Ok,
>
> I have my smtprelay.tab file blank, and
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:29 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay question
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Scott wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > ver1.1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 07/06/2002 17:23
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay?
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Lee Rich wrote:
> Hi all, I hope someone can help..
> Over the past few days our XMail system (running on linux) has been receiving
>thousa
hi there,
> > I had a few users complain that they were not getting emails, so after
> > some research it turned out that people were getting a "551 Server
> > denied do to IP restriction" error, however I noticed that I (as the
> > admin) was not getting an error email messages (the server.tab s
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "XMail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 09:34 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Scott Dale Robison wrote:
>
> > I was testing by creating an alternate account in my client (but not on
the
&g
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 08:48 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
> How are you testing it for relay?
>
> Bill
>
> >--
> >From: Scott Dale Robison[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Monday, December 10
How are you testing it for relay?
Bill
>--
>From: Scott Dale Robison[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:59 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
>
>> > I'm sure this has been asked many times, but
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 02:55 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Scott Dale Robison wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm sure this has been asked many times, but I'm not following how to
setup Xmail to restrict relaying. I have
> > I'm sure this has been asked many times, but I'm not following how to
setup Xmail to restrict relaying. I have my smtprelay.tab file setup as
follows:
> >
> > "127.0.0.1" "255.255.255.255"
> >
> > Applicable server.tab variables are:
> >
> > "EnableAuthSMTP-POP3" "0"
> > "DefaultSmtpPerm
35 matches
Mail list logo
