[xmail] Re: RDNS

2006-05-02 Thread Jason J Ellingson
Umm... I need to drink my coffee in the morning. How about I try -1? Sheesh... I was still thinking about the -S1 for SMTP logging... Sorry folks. - Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason J Ellingson Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-06-15 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Using a rbl (and spamhaus is a good one) and others tools like RDNS, = GLST, AV, anti-spam, ... is not a problem IF you take care to advertise your = users (if possible before effective deployment date) and explain them = advantages and possible problems (and how to explain problem to their

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-31 Thread David Lord
On 19 May 2005, at 9:44, Javier Navarro wrote: Hi Last days I've been using RDNS and RBL (sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) ckecks and many of my customers had problems. Some because they couldn't receive e-mail from other ISPs that didn't configure RDNS and others because they couldn't

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-31 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Using a rbl (and spamhaus is a good one) and others tools like RDNS, = GLST, AV, anti-spam, ... is not a problem IF you take care to advertise your = users (if possible before effective deployment date) and explain them = advantages and possible problems (and how to explain problem to their

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-31 Thread Sergio Perrone
This was a problem dificult to solve for me. After several months of disscusions with other domain admin´s , I choose to not check RDNS in order to keep my clients happy (almost). There´s too much domains without RDNS config and many more admins who doesn´t know (IMHO) what is exactly RDNS.

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-31 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 10.37 20/05/05 +0200, you wrote: Now I'm using Spamhaus, Ordb and Spamcop as RBL servers, do you advise any others? The list of DNSBL is very dependent on your special needs (and geographical location, I think). You have to experiment a bit for yourself. I'm using spamcop, njabl, spamhaus

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-31 Thread Snke Ruempler
Sergio Perrone wrote: This was a problem dificult to solve for me. After several months of disscusions with other domain admin´s , I choose to not check RDNS in order to keep my clients happy (almost). There´s too much domains without RDNS config and many more admins who doesn´t know (IMHO)

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-27 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 10.37 20/05/05 +0200, you wrote: Now I'm using Spamhaus, Ordb and Spamcop as RBL servers, do you advise any others? The list of DNSBL is very dependent on your special needs (and geographical location, I think). You have to experiment a bit for yourself. I'm using spamcop, njabl, spamhaus

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-27 Thread Javier Navarro
Thanks all, I'll experiment :-) *** Mensaje original *** El d=EDa 27/05/2005 a las 12:29 Francesco Vertova escribi=F3: At 10.37 20/05/05 +0200, you wrote: Now I'm using Spamhaus, Ordb and Spamcop as RBL servers, do you advise any others? The list of DNSBL is very

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-19 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Using a rbl (and spamhaus is a good one) and others tools like RDNS, = GLST, AV, anti-spam, ... is not a problem IF you take care to advertise your = users (if possible before effective deployment date) and explain them = advantages and possible problems (and how to explain problem to their

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-19 Thread David Lord
On 19 May 2005, at 9:44, Javier Navarro wrote: Hi Last days I've been using RDNS and RBL (sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) ckecks and many of my customers had problems. Some because they couldn't receive e-mail from other ISPs that didn't configure RDNS and others because they couldn't

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-19 Thread Sergio Perrone
This was a problem dificult to solve for me. After several months of disscusions with other domain admin´s , I choose to not check RDNS in order to keep my clients happy (almost). There´s too much domains without RDNS config and many more admins who doesn´t know (IMHO) what is exactly RDNS.

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-05-19 Thread Snke Ruempler
Sergio Perrone wrote: This was a problem dificult to solve for me. After several months of disscusions with other domain admin´s , I choose to not check RDNS in order to keep my clients happy (almost). There´s too much domains without RDNS config and many more admins who doesn´t know (IMHO)

[xmail] Re: RDNS

2004-11-11 Thread Tracy
At 19:22 11/11/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: Hi All- The mail server belonging to a client of mine mail.client.com uses another server relay.client.com to relay outgoing mail. mail.client.com appears to be correctly configured but relay.client.com doesn't resolve. Mail from this domain is bounced

[xmail] Re: RDNS

2004-11-11 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Thursday 11 November 2004 19:28, Tracy wrote: At 19:22 11/11/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: Hi All- The mail server belonging to a client of mine mail.client.com uses another server relay.client.com to relay outgoing mail. mail.client.com appears to be correctly configured but

[xmail] Re: RDNS

2004-11-11 Thread Tracy
At 19:22 11/11/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: Hi All- The mail server belonging to a client of mine mail.client.com uses another server relay.client.com to relay outgoing mail. mail.client.com appears to be correctly configured but relay.client.com doesn't resolve. Mail from this domain is bounced

[xmail] Re: RDNS problem

2004-02-05 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Sergio Casagrande wrote: I add some other information: - w2k sp 4 - xmail 1.17 I searched into dnscache directory and I founded a domain.it file within = the correct list with priority of domain mail servers (the same of hand = nslookup). Another strange thing is: I