Using a rbl (and spamhaus is a good one) and others tools like RDNS, =
GLST,
AV, anti-spam, ... is not a problem IF you take care to advertise your =
users
(if possible before effective deployment date) and explain them =
advantages
and possible problems (and how to explain problem to their contac
Sergio Perrone wrote:
> This was a problem dificult to solve for me.
> After several months of disscusions with other domain admin´s , I choose
> to not check RDNS in order to keep my clients happy (almost).
> There´s too much domains without RDNS config and many more admins who
> doesn´t know (I
At 10.37 20/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
>Now I'm using Spamhaus, Ordb and Spamcop as RBL servers, do you advise any
>others?
The list of DNSBL is very dependent on your special needs (and geographical
location, I think). You have to experiment a bit for yourself. I'm using
spamcop, njabl, spamhaus
This was a problem dificult to solve for me.
After several months of disscusions with other domain admin´s , I choose
to not check RDNS in order to keep my clients happy (almost).
There´s too much domains without RDNS config and many more admins who
doesn´t know (IMHO) what is exactly RDNS.
RDNS
Using a rbl (and spamhaus is a good one) and others tools like RDNS, =
GLST,
AV, anti-spam, ... is not a problem IF you take care to advertise your =
users
(if possible before effective deployment date) and explain them =
advantages
and possible problems (and how to explain problem to their contact
On 19 May 2005, at 9:44, Javier Navarro wrote:
> Hi
> Last days I've been using RDNS and RBL (sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) ckecks
> and many of my customers had problems. Some because they couldn't
> receive e-mail from other ISPs that didn't configure RDNS and others
> because they couldn't re
Thanks all, I'll experiment :-)
*** Mensaje original ***
El d=EDa 27/05/2005 a las 12:29 Francesco Vertova escribi=F3:
>At 10.37 20/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
>
>>Now I'm using Spamhaus, Ordb and Spamcop as RBL servers, do you advise
>any
>>others?
>
>The list of DNSBL is
At 10.37 20/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
>Now I'm using Spamhaus, Ordb and Spamcop as RBL servers, do you advise any
>others?
The list of DNSBL is very dependent on your special needs (and geographical
location, I think). You have to experiment a bit for yourself. I'm using
spamcop, njabl, spamhaus
Thanks for your answers.
Just a question. If I use "-2" at RDNS will it help to stop any spam? I=
don't see how this delay may help.
Now I'm using Spamhaus, Ordb and Spamcop as RBL servers, do you advise any=
others?
Thanks again
Javier Navarro
*** Mensaje original
Sergio Perrone wrote:
> This was a problem dificult to solve for me.
> After several months of disscusions with other domain admin´s , I choose
> to not check RDNS in order to keep my clients happy (almost).
> There´s too much domains without RDNS config and many more admins who
> doesn´t know (I
This was a problem dificult to solve for me.
After several months of disscusions with other domain admin´s , I choose
to not check RDNS in order to keep my clients happy (almost).
There´s too much domains without RDNS config and many more admins who
doesn´t know (IMHO) what is exactly RDNS.
RDNS
On 19 May 2005, at 9:44, Javier Navarro wrote:
> Hi
> Last days I've been using RDNS and RBL (sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) ckecks
> and many of my customers had problems. Some because they couldn't
> receive e-mail from other ISPs that didn't configure RDNS and others
> because they couldn't re
Using a rbl (and spamhaus is a good one) and others tools like RDNS, =
GLST,
AV, anti-spam, ... is not a problem IF you take care to advertise your =
users
(if possible before effective deployment date) and explain them =
advantages
and possible problems (and how to explain problem to their contact
13 matches
Mail list logo
