[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-26 Thread Peter Lindeman
Liron Newman wrote: > You're correct, but there's one thing you can't ignore: If it's /your/ > setting that causes the mail not to get where it should, then the users > are going to say it's /your/ problem. And I got this even from the most > tech-savvy of them. > > I feel I should give the

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-26 Thread Liron Newman
You're correct, but there's one thing you can't ignore: If it's /your/ setting that causes the mail not to get where it should, then the users are going to say it's /your/ problem. And I got this even from the most tech-savvy of them. I feel I should give the best service to my users, and the

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-26 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Liron schrieb: > Hello everybody, > I see your discussions of spam blacklists, and I want to ask you this: > Haven't you had complaints about messages that /should/ get through not > doing so? > When I used ORBS and MAPS and all of those, I had a lot of complaints > from various people tha

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-02 Thread Henrik Steffen
www.franchise.city-map.de Handelsregister: AG Stade HRB 5811 - UstId: DE 213645563 - Original Message - From: "QCI Internet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 3:46 P

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-02 Thread QCI Internet
script on linux. Jeff Jarchow QCI Internet http://www.qcinet.net/ - Original Message - From: "Henrik Steffen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:02 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: Using SpamCop > > > Hi, > > I&

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-02 Thread Henrik Steffen
-- 24h-Support Hotline: +49 1908 34697 (EUR 1.86/Min,topc) System-Partner gesucht: http://www.franchise.city-map.de ---------------- Handelsregister: AG Stade HRB 5811 - UstId: DE 213645563

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-02 Thread Jeff
- > Handelsregister: AG Stade HRB 5811 - UstId: DE 213645563 > > > - Original Message - > From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:31

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-02 Thread Henrik Steffen
45563 - Original Message - From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:31 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Using SpamCop > > I just have to get in on this discussion. As I agree and disagree with > some comments from others

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-02 Thread Jeff
- > >Handelsregister: AG Stade HRB 5811 - UstId: DE 213645563 > >-------- > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Peter Lindeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To:

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-02 Thread Liron Newman
213645563 > > >- Original Message - >From: "Peter Lindeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:15 PM >Subject: [xmail] Re: Using SpamCop > >

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-02 Thread Liron Newman
I have to comment on that: While it may be that because I am and always was careful about my e-mail address I myself have nevr been getting much spam, I feel that the amounts of spam from before I removed the filters and now have not changed at all, while the amouts of complaints dropped to a

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-01 Thread Henrik Steffen
--- - Original Message - From: "Peter Lindeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:15 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Using SpamCop > > Henrik Steffen wrote: > > > and yes: we do still have complaints from people

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-01 Thread Peter Lindeman
Henrik Steffen wrote: > and yes: we do still have complaints from people that can't send mail > to us, or even worse: to our customers. We are hosting about 2.000 > mail-domains on our mailserver. Well I think it is very simply. If a person can't mail he/she should complain at their provider.

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-01 Thread Henrik Steffen
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 3:22 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Using SpamCop > > > Um. No. No trouble at all. If mail is not getting through it is because that > IP address is listed with one o

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-08-01 Thread jaydrake
> > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >On Behalf Of Peter Lindeman > >Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:30 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: [xmail] Re: Using SpamCop > > > > > >[EMAIL PROT

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-07-31 Thread Liron Newman
Lindeman >Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:30 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [xmail] Re: Using SpamCop > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>Could someone give me an example of how I would setup >>XMail to use the SpamCop blacklist. >> >>

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-07-31 Thread xmail
Thank you, Yes, you are right, works great. In 5 minutes Xmail refused 5 spam messages. Rich... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Peter Lindeman Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Using

[xmail] Re: Using SpamCop

2002-07-31 Thread Peter Lindeman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Could someone give me an example of how I would setup > XMail to use the SpamCop blacklist. > > It looks like it's as simple as putting a line in the server.tab > file, but I'm at a loss on how to begin. > > Could anyone recommend other blacklists that would be bett