[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Rob Arends
Behalf Of Mike Harrington Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 11:51 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex Yes you can, you just can't use the logic to run a program only on AUTHETNICATED mail. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Mike Harrington
Yes you can, you just can't use the logic to run a program only on AUTHETNICATED mail. - Original Message - From: "Rob Arends" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 4:46 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex > > Hmm, In that cas

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Rob Arends
ide Libenzi Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 11:47 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > Davide, It's nice that you can confirm. !!?? > > I'm confused with the meaning of your response. > Le

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Rob Arends
_ Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 11:35 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > Davide, It's nice that you can confirm. !!?? > > I'm confused with the meaning of your response. > Let me reword: > > In a post-data filter I have the following: > > "!aex=0"[tab]"D:\prog_for_non_auth_user.exe" > "!aex=1"[tab]"D:\prog_for_auth_user.e

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Mike Harrington wrote: > > Then what was this about: > > >> > >> Davide, The testing shows that an Auth'd user will run the first of the > >> two > >> examples below, > >> But a non Auth'd user will run both. > >> > >> Can you confirm? > > > Yes I can. > > isn't that opp

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Rob Arends
uot;post-data" "EXCL" "-1" "-1" "D:\prog_for_auth_user.exe;" I expected to see Message1 with the first log entry with an EXCL. Thanks, Rob :-) _ Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Mike Harrington
Then what was this about: >> >> Davide, The testing shows that an Auth'd user will run the first of the >> two >> examples below, >> But a non Auth'd user will run both. >> >> Can you confirm? > Yes I can. isn't that opposite? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail"

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Mike Harrington wrote: > In the example: > > "!aex=1"[tab]"prog" <- user is auth'd > "!aex=0"[tab]"prog" <- user is not auth'd > > I thought it stated that an auth'd user will NOT run the first of the two, > and a non-authed user would run both? Am I missing som

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Mike Harrington
ssing something? - Original Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" To: Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 3:29 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > >> >> Davide, The testing shows that an Auth'd user will

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > Davide, The testing shows that an Auth'd user will run the first of the two > examples below, > But a non Auth'd user will run both. > > Can you confirm? Yes I can. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Rob Arends
al Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Arends Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 9:04 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex Ok, thanks, so I'll test with "!aex=1"[tab]"prog" <- user is auth

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Rob Arends
later... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:59 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > > Ok, for consi

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > > Ok, for consistency with the doc, now you can do the aex=0 smart thing. > > Ok, ignore crossed email > > BTW, is that "!aex=0" or "aex=0" > Does the "!" indicate Flags here, or does it mean "not" It means "this is not the executable path, but a fl

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Rob Arends
___ Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:46 AM To: XMail mailing list Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Da

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Rob Arends
Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 7:49 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > Davide, let me first quote your documentation: > > > "!flags"[TAB]"command"[TAB]"

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > > > > Davide, let me first quote your documentation: > > > > > > "!flags"[TAB]"command"[TAB]"arg-or-macro"[TAB]...[NEWLINE] > > > > Each file may contain multiple commands, that will be executed in stri

[xmail] Re: filter aex & wlex

2006-11-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > Davide, let me first quote your documentation: > > > "!flags"[TAB]"command"[TAB]"arg-or-macro"[TAB]...[NEWLINE] > > Each file may contain multiple commands, that will be executed in strictly > sequential order. The first command that will trigger a