At 18.46 08/11/07, you wrote:
>Here we are using:
>#"SmtpMsgIPBanMaps" "550 Denied due inclusion of your IP in the following
>map"
With that entry commented out, the peer should get a "550 Denied due
inclusion of your IP inside (map name)", besides the usual
"SNDRIP=EIPMAP (map name)" in the SM
(0xx11) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br
- Original Message -
From: "Francesco Vertova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, 8 de November de 2007 15:04
Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList
At 17.26 08/11/07, you wrote:
>So, in which situation &#
At 17.26 08/11/07, you wrote:
>So, in which situation '551 Server access forbidden by your IP' is returned?
I think it's a sort of default error message. Usually from
smtp.ipmap.tab, since the other IP-based blocks (CustMapsList and
spammers.tab) have their own messages.
>Because, if I comment
-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br
- Original Message -
From: "Francesco Vertova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, 8 de November de 2007 14:19
Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList
At 17.03 08/11/07, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
>Here we are using:
>&quo
At 17.03 08/11/07, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
>Here we are using:
>"CustMapsList"
>"zen.spamhaus.org.:0,dsn.rfc-ignorant.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0"
>
>BUT we are having too many
>'551 Server access forbidden by your IP'
>
>*even* with authenticated users (yes, I=B4m sure they are authenticated).
Th
Here we are using:
"CustMapsList"
"zen.spamhaus.org.:0,dsn.rfc-ignorant.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0"
BUT we are having too many
'551 Server access forbidden by your IP'
*even* with authenticated users (yes, I´m sure they are authenticated).
At this moment we could not solve this problem.
ps: XMai
Thanks a lot Francesco !
-Message d'origine-
De=A0: [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De
la part de Francesco Vertova
Envoy=E9=A0: mercredi 7 novembre 2007 12:57
=C0=A0: xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet=A0: [xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList
At 11.35 07/11/07, you wrote:
At 11.35 07/11/07, you wrote:
>To filter a bit the spam, I'm using this CustMapsList (but I'm not satisfied
>at all with my list.)
>
>"CustMapsList"
>"sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org.:0,combined.njabl.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0"
>
>Anyone has a better list to give me or complete?
It depends on the reasons why
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Rob Arends wrote:
> Brett, if you happen to remember that Net::ldap perl script site, I'd
> like to take a look.
Grrr. I just got the VBS script to do exactly what I wanted today
and blew everything else away... I do have a copy on a Zip Disk - that I
left at work (
ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 9:16 AM
> To: XMail List
> Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab
>
>
>
>
> If you are using Perl on your server - there is a nice
> routine - w
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> In your setup you have a gfi product ...
Not anymore.
> so the above could not work depending of gfi setup and integration
> with exchange ...
>
> Can you give me the exact gfi product name used (and version) as gfi
> have more than one product for ex
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoy=E9 : jeudi 7 avril 2005 19:14
> =C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
> Objet : [xmail] Re: server.tab
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > Where did you put the settings in the exchange server ?
&g
At 19:15 4/7/2005, Brett wrote:
> > Just add -SI parameters for each address/port pair (to the MAIL_CMD_LINE
> > registry entry) you want to have SMTP bound on
>
>Well - Hotdamn - I think I will mess with that this weekend.
>
>Oh - I got a VBS script to give me all the email addresses from the
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Tracy wrote:
> At 13:13 4/7/2005, Brett wrote:
> > I have thought about forcing Exchange to use port 24 which should
> > pretty well stop it doing anything but have not researched setting up
> > XMail to run on both ports 25 and 24 - I am not even sure it can.
>
> Sure it can.
At 13:13 4/7/2005, Brett wrote:
>I have thought about forcing Exchange to use port 24 which should pretty
>well stop it doing anything but have not researched setting up XMail to
>run on both ports 25 and 24 - I am not even sure it can.
Sure it can. You can run Xmail on any ports you want. I curre
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> Many of our customers installed with exchange use our xmail servers as
> smarthost for outgoing mails with no problems from exchange 5.5 to 2003
> = (no static ips, or no reverse zone, ...).
I have no doubt it does work... 8-)
> Where did you put the
At 01:12 4/7/2005, Alexander Hagenah wrote:
> >> Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive
> >> incoming mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam / virus scans
> >> done prior to receipt), and all outbound mail from the Exchange
> >> server will go through Xmail as a smart
doing dns delivery) =
are in
the 'smtp connector'...
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 7 avril 2005 08:29
=C0 : XMail List
Objet : [xmail] Re: server.tab
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Alexander Hagenah wrote:
> xmail schrieb am W
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Alexander Hagenah wrote:
> xmail schrieb am Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:00 PM:
> > > Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive
> > > incoming mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam/virus scans
> > > done prior to receipt), and all outbound mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:00
PM:
>> Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive
>> incoming mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam / virus scans
>> done prior to receipt), and all outbound mail from the Exchange
>> server will go through Xm
An incomplete MSFT KB article? NO WAY!
- Original Message -
From: "Tracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 1:10 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab
> At 15:59 4/6/2005, Brett wrote:
> > > Once it's all set up, though, the Exch
At 15:59 4/6/2005, Brett wrote:
> > Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive incoming
> > mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam / virus scans done prior
> > to receipt), and all outbound mail from the Exchange server will go
> > through Xmail as a smarthost.
>
>I can't
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Tracy wrote:
> At 13:58 4/6/2005, Brett wrote:
> > Since this all feeds into an Exchange 2000 server (which is
> > 'stunningly stupid' and was made even 'more stupid' when we tried to
> > use GFI on it never mind the huge COST of the GFI software that - as
> > it looks now - is
At 13:58 4/6/2005, Brett wrote:
>Since this all feeds into an Exchange 2000 server (which is 'stunningly
>stupid' and was made even 'more stupid' when we tried to use GFI on it
>never mind the huge COST of the GFI software that - as it looks now - is
>in a bad ROI ratio compared to XMail 8-) about
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Tracy wrote:
> At 06:03 4/6/2005, Brett wrote:
> > Mail for MYCOMPANY.COM is handled by XMail at MYDOMAIN.COM
> > All mail (that gets thru the filters) for MYCOMPANY.COM is
> > handed to an (GACK!) Exchange 2000 server.
> >
> > I do this thru a Custom Domain.
> >
> > First anyt
At 06:03 4/6/2005, Brett wrote:
>Mail for MYCOMPANY.COM is handled by XMail at MYDOMAIN.COM
>All mail (that gets thru the filters) for MYCOMPANY.COM is
>handed to an (GACK!) Exchange 2000 server.
>
>I do this thru a Custom Domain.
>
>First anything getting through the Spam Lists, DNS, etc. and rece
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Why not just use the -Mr switch for the rotation of your logfiles
> instead? Much better than stopping & starting xmail.
Well - cause I want to? 8-)
I am currently doing a ton of logging from my filters.
Setup is basically this - I could be ALL WRO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:12
AM:
> At 00.55 06/04/05 -0700, you wrote:
>=20
>> Can _NOT_ be modified while XMail is running (And shouldn't be
>> edited by hand - use the CTRL Admin Protocol instead):
>>=20
>> aliases.tab
>> aliasdomain.tab
>> domains.tab
>> extalia
At 00.55 06/04/05 -0700, you wrote:
>Can _NOT_ be modified while XMail is running (And shouldn't be edited by
>hand - use the CTRL Admin Protocol instead):
>
>aliases.tab
>aliasdomain.tab
>domains.tab
>extaliases.tab
>mailusers.tab
>pop3links.tab
They shouldn't be modified through the CTRL cfgfil
Why not just use the -Mr switch for the rotation of your logfiles instead?
Much better than stopping & starting xmail.
- Original Message -
From: "Brett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:27 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab
>
> On
Yes, absolutly.
Can be modified while XMail is running:
all mailproc.tab files
server.tab
smtpgw.tab
smtpfwd.tab
smtprelay.tab
smtpauth.tab
smtpextauth.tab
userdef.tab
ctrlaccounts.tab
spammers.tab
spam-address.tab
pop3.ipmap.tab
smtp.ipmap.tab
ctrl.ipmap.tab
finger.ipmap.tab
smtp.ipprop.tab
filt
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Ladislav Sedivy wrote:
> Can you change server.tab without restarting xmail on Windows 2000?
I don't think you can without some admin software. I installed as a
service so I have used the Services to restart but I also use a batch file
(to clean and rotate logfiles) I just us
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Orion Productions wrote:
> Hi,
> A few questions about the variables in server.tab:
>
> * What's the difference between RootDomain and POP3Domain?
> Where is RootDomain used/how should it be configured?
Set it to a domain that is present in your XMail setup (better you own
i
Davide schrieb:
> until it's the fastest mta i do not plan changes :-)
Huh? I thought XMail is already the fastest?
Which one is faster?
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send
> Now these ideas would not really make much of an impact on a nicely spec'd
> server, but for a little linux
> server at home, it could have some performance improvements
hmm on a home linux machine with <10 accounts and some mails per day the
performance improvements should be near 0 :-)
> If so, could we not have XMail read in the config server.tab at start up
> and then when a change is made, a SIGHUP is sent to XMail to
> reload the config.
if you change the server.tab with CTRL server (cfgfileset), it will be
rehashed automatically at runtime (imho). i don't know about manual
why not use control client?
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Henrik Steffen
Geschäftsführer
top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH
Am Steinkamp 7 - D-21684 Stade - Germany
http://www.topconcepts.com Tel. +49 4141 991230
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
37 matches
Mail list logo
