On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, My BSD wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:26:36 -0800 (PST)
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, My BSD wrote:
> >
> > ... ...
> > >
> > > At the end of the SMTP session, why, when the message already contains a
> > > Return-Path header, does XMail not prepen
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, My BSD wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:06:26 -0800 (PST)
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> ... ...
> >
> > I thought I explained pretty clearly the behavior, by citing even the RFC.
> > MTA -> MTA transaction does not fit the bill of "message has left the SMTP
> > environme
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, My BSD wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:27:47 -0800 (PST)
> davidel at xmailserver.org (Davide Libenzi) wrote:
>
> > ... ...
> >
> > The Return-Path header must be set only when SMTP servers do the "final
> > delivery" on the recipient mailbox.
> > An MTA->MTA message mus
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Oliver Stöneberg wrote:
> Quoting RFC 2821 section 6.1:
>
> If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the
>receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message.
> This
>notification MUST be sent using a null ("<>") reverse path in the
>
Quoting RFC 2821 section 6.1:
If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the
receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message.
This
notification MUST be sent using a null ("<>") reverse path in the
envelope. The recipient of this notification MUST be the
Please forgive me if this is a silly question.
When sending a message from XMail's sendmail, the messages have
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' as the Return-Path. I can't figure out why this is.
More important is that I want to fix it.
I've been searching the mailing list and Googleing my fingers off trying
Hi:
I'd like to report initial success installing my first mail-server,
XMail for a small website. Lots of fun working with XMail. Thank
you for your work on it.
I have an initial problem, and an overview question.
The problem:
I cannot get a Return-Path: of other than <
