Re: [Xmame] xmame-0.61.1

2002-11-14 Thread Benjamin FRANCOIS
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:19:20 -0700 Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you use the newest makefile.unix? It now defines SDL_CONFIG, > which was added to support FreeBSD. Oh, it might come from there, then. I use a script that automatically builds all targets then packs'em with some do

Re: [Xmame] xmame-0.61.1

2002-11-14 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:53:41PM +0100, Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: > > I managed to build it on my Debian Sid, but couldn't get xmame.SDL to > build :-/ Pretty strange, as all the 0.61.1-prX SDL targets built > without any problem. Did you use the newest makefile.unix? It now defines SDL_CONFIG,

Re: [Xmame] xmame-0.61.1

2002-11-14 Thread Benjamin FRANCOIS
On 14 Nov 2002 11:55:04 -0500 Caleb Shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It does NOT build xmame.xgl since I still can't get that target to > build under Gentoo. I managed to build it on my Debian Sid, but couldn't get xmame.SDL to build :-/ Pretty strange, as all the 0.61.1-prX SDL targets built wi

Re: [Xmame] xmame-0.61.1

2002-11-14 Thread Caleb Shay
And, as is my MO, the new Gentoo ebuild for xmame-0.61.1 has been submitted. You can grab it now from bugs.gentoo.org and start testing. I especially need feedback from anybody running Gentoo-ppc or Gentoo-sparc{64} since I don't have a Mac or Sun to test on. (Does xmame even work on linux-sparc

Re: [Xmame] xmame-0.61.1

2002-11-14 Thread Matthias Saou
Hi, Following Lawrence's release of 0.61.1 (yeah, at last!), I've updated my xmame packages for Red Hat Linux 8.0. I've also included the latest highscore, history and mameinfo data files. As usual, three targets are available, x11, SDL and xgl. The x11 should be compiled with both DGA and XV (I

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 ROMS

2002-11-14 Thread Pete French
> I will provide limited (FTP) access to XMAME people to update > to 62 ROMS when I have a complete set. Now I have 9 > incomplete and 28 missing ROMS. This is the way its been done in the past - last three releases I've hosted a bit tarfile of all changed roms for people to patch their romsets u

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 ROMS

2002-11-14 Thread Ohta Kyuma
Dear David, Thanx for information!! Importing CDs has risk of a customhouse. I was forgot mame.dk and links of there and I remember them... Thanx.. Artane. Written by David Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 14 Nov 2002 07:53:46 -0600 : Subject: Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 ROMS djrosen9

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 ROMS

2002-11-14 Thread Joe Ceklosky
I will provide limited (FTP) access to XMAME people to update to 62 ROMS when I have a complete set. Now I have 9 incomplete and 28 missing ROMS. I want to help the XMAME people, not provide ROMS for the 'grubbers' out there. Joe On 14 Nov 2002, David Rosen wrote: > On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 07

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 ROMS

2002-11-14 Thread David Rosen
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 07:37, Ohta Kyuma wrote: aweful lot of concealed rom begging on this list lately which kind of surprises me but... For the unintiated: The tombstones burners are quickly getting up to date for 62 consult the third link in my sig for details. If that route does not appeal to

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62

2002-11-14 Thread Ohta Kyuma
Hi, Written by Joe Ceklosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:47:55 -0500 : Subject: Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 jceklosk> Chris, jceklosk> jceklosk> Thanks for the 0.62. I have about 11 incorrect's and 28 missing now. jceklosk> Anyone have a complete 0.62 set yet? jceklosk> I

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62

2002-11-14 Thread Joe Ceklosky
Chris, Thanks for the 0.62. I have about 11 incorrect's and 28 missing now. Anyone have a complete 0.62 set yet? Joe Frank Cox wrote: On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:50:08 -0800 XulChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also, I made available an xmame 0.62 at http://tkmame.retrogames.com/xmame.x11.gz