On Sep 26, 2005, at 3:36 PM, mushroom blue wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 18:40 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Support for mameinfo ang history.dat has been removed by mamedev.
is there any reason why? I actually liked history.dat...
From the change log:
"Removed the internal display of h
mushroom blue wrote:
is there any reason why? I actually liked history.dat...
And so do we, but the in-MAME viewer was useless.
Frontends do the jobs much better...
- Paul
___
Xmame mailing list
Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk
http://toybox.twisted.or
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 18:40 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Support for mameinfo ang history.dat has been removed by mamedev.
>
is there any reason why? I actually liked history.dat...
> ___
> Xmame mailing list
> Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk
> http://t
Matthias Saou wrote:
> Lawrence Gold wrote :
>
>
>>xmame and xmess 0.100 are now available.
>
>
> Thanks a lot Lawrence! :-)
>
>
>>- Using "make install" no longer strips debug symbols from the
>> executables.
>
>
> But it seems the default LD with -s still strips the binaries you get fro
On Sep 26, 2005, at 10:32 AM, Matthias Saou wrote:
error: unknown option history_file, on line 46 of
file: /home/dude/.xmame/xmamerc ignoring line
error: unknown option mameinfo_file, on line 47 of
file: /home/dude/.xmame/xmamerc ignoring line
I've double checked, and 0.99 doesn't give those er
Lawrence Gold wrote :
> xmame and xmess 0.100 are now available.
Thanks a lot Lawrence! :-)
> - Using "make install" no longer strips debug symbols from the
>executables.
But it seems the default LD with -s still strips the binaries you get from
the compilation, so in practice this change d
