[Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62

2002-11-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
FYI, especially concerning a possible license change. My plans are to merge MESS 0.61.2, finish putting in the updatebounds changes (I think I'm close to having something working), and release xmame/xmess-0.61.1. If the OSD changes in 0.62 are small, then I should be able to release xmame-0.62

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62

2002-11-12 Thread XulChris
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 04:18 pm, Lawrence Gold wrote: > If the OSD changes in 0.62 are small, then I should be able to release > xmame-0.62.1-pr1 (without rotation support) fairly quickly. > > - Screen rotation is now entirely handled at blit time by the OS layer. The > core no longer prerot

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62

2002-11-12 Thread Lawrence Gold
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:50:08PM -0800, XulChris wrote: > > Would it be possible to cut&paste the rotation routines from the old mame into > the osd functions? That'd probably be the way to go initially. We can always pretty it up later. ___ Xmam

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62

2002-11-12 Thread Toan T Nguyen
Damn. I've just burnt 7 CDs yesterday. BTW, the MMX memcpy() gives a modest few FPS increases on my PII233. On my Athlon XP 1800 at work, CPU times consumption goes down from 80% to 76%. Overall, the gain is marginal. Your mileage may varies. ___

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62

2002-11-12 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:50:08 -0800 XulChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, I made available an xmame 0.62 at > http://tkmame.retrogames.com/xmame.x11.gz This binary is only meant for > > those who wish to get their ROM collecting done early. No games are > guaranteed to work, but the audi

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62

2002-11-14 Thread Joe Ceklosky
Chris, Thanks for the 0.62. I have about 11 incorrect's and 28 missing now. Anyone have a complete 0.62 set yet? Joe Frank Cox wrote: On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:50:08 -0800 XulChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also, I made available an xmame 0.62 at http://tkmame.retrogames.com/xmame.x11.gz

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62

2002-11-14 Thread Ohta Kyuma
Hi, Written by Joe Ceklosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:47:55 -0500 : Subject: Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 jceklosk> Chris, jceklosk> jceklosk> Thanks for the 0.62. I have about 11 incorrect's and 28 missing now. jceklosk> Anyone have a complete 0.62 s

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 ROMS

2002-11-14 Thread David Rosen
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 07:37, Ohta Kyuma wrote: aweful lot of concealed rom begging on this list lately which kind of surprises me but... For the unintiated: The tombstones burners are quickly getting up to date for 62 consult the third link in my sig for details. If that route does not appeal to

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 ROMS

2002-11-14 Thread Joe Ceklosky
I will provide limited (FTP) access to XMAME people to update to 62 ROMS when I have a complete set. Now I have 9 incomplete and 28 missing ROMS. I want to help the XMAME people, not provide ROMS for the 'grubbers' out there. Joe On 14 Nov 2002, David Rosen wrote: > On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 07

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 ROMS

2002-11-14 Thread Ohta Kyuma
Dear David, Thanx for information!! Importing CDs has risk of a customhouse. I was forgot mame.dk and links of there and I remember them... Thanx.. Artane. Written by David Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 14 Nov 2002 07:53:46 -0600 : Subject: Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.6

Re: [Xmame] [MAME] MAME 0.62 ROMS

2002-11-14 Thread Pete French
> I will provide limited (FTP) access to XMAME people to update > to 62 ROMS when I have a complete set. Now I have 9 > incomplete and 28 missing ROMS. This is the way its been done in the past - last three releases I've hosted a bit tarfile of all changed roms for people to patch their romsets u