Scaling with an embedded X server.

2009-06-29 Thread David Moffatt
I have a set up where I use Xpehyr to display an X-display inside of an x-window app. I need to increase the resolution of the embedded display but I also need to keep the hosting window the same size. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to scale? Is there scaling in the Xorg server that

Re: Embedded X

2008-11-06 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 03:25:10AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: glibc chews up what, twenty megabytes? [citation needed] $ dpkg -s libc6 locales | grep ^Installed-Size: Installed-Size: 11452 Installed-Size: 11752 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:OSELAS.BSP-phyCORE-trunk dpkg --contents

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-19 Thread William Tracy
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: $ dpkg -s libc6 locales | grep ^Installed-Size: Installed-Size: 11452 Installed-Size: 11752 /me shuts up now. -- William Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vice President, Cal Poly Linux Users' Group

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-19 Thread Amit
I got stuck again while porting X11/GTK+ on OMAP. I'm not sure whether it is the right forum for these questions or not but these questions are directly or indirectly associated with Mesa/GL libraries. Dependency chart is like this ... GTK+ needs cairo-pdf and cairo-ps backend cairo-pdf needs

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-19 Thread Amit
Just an update on my previous concern. I compiled that program which was troubling me for build platform and let it run during make process. As of now Mesa has successfully compiled using arm-gcc toolchain. Lets hope it doesn't break other things. Thanks for your concern. Regards Amit Pundir

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-18 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:21:06AM -0700, William Tracy wrote: glibc chews up what, twenty megabytes? [citation needed] signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-18 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Thanks for the info. Will be nice if someone can quickly tell any pros and cons of using kdrive instead of Xorg, Pros: pretty much none. Cons: it's not Xorg. Pros: it's easier to understand and to work with. it doesn't have the module loader. Cons: it doesn't have the module

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-18 Thread Paul Bender
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: glibc chews up what, twenty megabytes? [citation needed] $ dpkg -s libc6 locales | grep ^Installed-Size: Installed-Size: 11452 Installed-Size: 11752 That has been built for normal desktop use. I use glibc in MiniMyth and it between 2MB and 3MB.

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-17 Thread William Tracy
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My point is really to compare apples to apples; generally, once running X, you also are interested in running GTK/Qt based toolkits, which may have stronger requirements on libc than X does. So blindly saying uClibc is

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-15 Thread Kamalneet Singh
Amit wrote: Thank you all for your inputs. I built x-server with kdrive enabled as Mikhail and Kamalneet suggested. I used the Xorg 7.2 release. It did build up successfully but with so many extensions enabled [:(] which I'm not sure whether I will be using or not. So, now I'm trying to

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-15 Thread Kamalneet Singh
Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 08:40:13AM +0100, John Tapsell wrote: 2008/10/14 Amit [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Only building Xserver will be sufficient or do I have to build the whole X11 package availbale at http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/X11R7.2/src/ ? Why not just go for the

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-15 Thread walter harms
uClibc is in heavy development. perhaps you can forward your problems building with uClib to the uClib Mailinglist ? IMHO the lack of I18N (i do not know the state of uClib here either!) is not a problem since it is designed for memorytight systems where it is unlikly to have i18n at all. re,

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-15 Thread Matthias Hopf
On Oct 15, 08 14:25:07 +0530, Amit wrote: I want my applications to use OPENGL ES + EGL. So I think I have to go with --enable-xgl --enable-xglx. No, you need --enable-glx. Matthias -- Matthias Hopf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-15 Thread Amit
What do you want to do? 1. Enable X clients(applications) to use OpenGL ES + EGL? or 2. Make X Server itself use OpenGL ES + EGL for rendering? I want my applications to use OPENGL ES + EGL. So I think I have to go with --enable-xgl --enable-xglx. Regards Amit

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-15 Thread John Tapsell
Are there any performance differences between Xorg and kdrive? Is EXA better than KAA? My tests with the very lastest OMAP boards: I found a 20% speed improvement on the OMAP between kdrive fbdev KAA and xorg fbdev EXA. However I didn't not use the most recent version of kdrive for the

Embedded X

2008-10-14 Thread Amit
Hello team, First of all please excuse me for my questions if they seem trivial or if they have already been discussed on this mailing list though I have done much googling for this information. My concern is if there is any tiny/embedded version of X11 available targeting the embedded

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-14 Thread Amit
I forget to add that I will be using OPENGL ES 1.1/2.0 Thanks and Regards Amit Pundir On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Amit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello team, First of all please excuse me for my questions if they seem trivial or if they have already been discussed on this mailing list

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-14 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 11:41:31 14.10.2008 UTC+05 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and gimble: A My concern is if there is any tiny/embedded version of X11 available A targeting the embedded platforms? kdrive. You will find it in X.org server tree. -- pgpPOPSC70pxC.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-14 Thread Kamalneet Singh
Amit wrote: Hello team, First of all please excuse me for my questions if they seem trivial or if they have already been discussed on this mailing list though I have done much googling for this information. My concern is if there is any tiny/embedded version of X11 available targeting

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-14 Thread Amit
Only building Xserver will be sufficient or do I have to build the whole X11 package availbale at http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/X11R7.2/src/ ? Thanks and Regards Amit Pundir On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Kamalneet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amit wrote: Hello team, First of all

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-14 Thread Kamalneet Singh
Amit wrote: Only building Xserver will be sufficient or do I have to build the whole X11 package availbale at http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/X11R7.2/src/ ? Not whole, but a lot of it. There is Building the modular tree at http://www.x.org/wiki/ModularDevelopersGuide, I don't know if it

Re: Embedded X

2008-10-14 Thread William Tracy
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:40 AM, John Tapsell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not just go for the full X11? Memory wise I found no difference in the memory usage between X11 and kdrive on the OMAP. I am told that the full Xorg isn't very happy when built against uClibc. The original poster